PARADIP PORT AUTHORITY,JAGATSINGHPUR vs. DCIT,CIRCLE1(1), CUTTACK

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are allowed

57,376, as it contends, or twenty-five per cent of Re 87,010, as the revenue appeared to contend.” Section 11(1)(a) reads thus: "11. Income from property held for charitable or religious purposes-(1)(a) Income derived from property held under trust

SUKANTI EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST,SONEPUR vs. ITO,EXEMPTION WARD, SAMBALPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy(Kz) & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Charitable Trust. the total income is thus worked out at ₹ 2,52,02,716/- which has been rounded off to ₹ 2,52,02,720/-. Aggrieved with the assessment order, the assessee filed an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) in which one of the grounds of appeal taken was that the expenses

JOHARIMAL HIGH SCHOOL,CUTTACK vs. ITO EXEMPTION, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: S/ S/Shri Chandra Mohan Garg, Judicial & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpiaassessment Year : 2018-19 Joharimal High School, Joharimal High School, Vs. Ito (Exemptions), Ito (Exemptions), Ganesh Ganesh Ghat, Ghat, Po: Po: Cuttack Chandinchowk, Cuttack Chandinchowk, Cuttack Pan/Gir No. No.Aaatj 3292 R (Appellant (Appellant) .. ( Respondent Respondent) Assessee By Assessee By : Shri P.K.Mishra & R.K.Jhunjhunwala P.K.Mishra & R.K.Jhunjhunwala, Ars Revenue By : Shri Sovesh Chandra Mohanty, Chandra Mohanty, (Dr) Date Of Hearing : 2/3/ 20 / 2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 09/ /3/2022 O R D E R Per C.M.Garg G, Jm

charitable trust under section 12AA, all incidental expenditures laid out by assessee wholly or exclusively for purpose of making or earning such income were also to be allowed under section 57

DY.CIT(EXP), BHUBANESWAR vs. M/S. ORISSA COMPUTER ACADEMY, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals filed by the revenue and cross objections of the

Bench: S/Shri P.M. Jagtap & C.M. Garg

trust is used or applied for benefit of any persons referred in the Section, hence as mentioned in CIT(A)'s order, some benefit has gone to person specified in Section 13, hence assessee is not eligible for exemption. This also emanates from Section 12AA(4). (8) The appellant craves leave to add, delete, substitute and to amend any ground

ORISSA COMPUTER ACADEMY,BHUBANESWAR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-2(1), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical

Bench: S/Shri N.S Saini & Pavan Kumar Gadale

57,728/- 2. Smt. Sarmistha Rath` : Rs. 3,82,456/- 3. Sri Subrat Prasanna Mishra: Rs. 4,34,561/- 4. Smt. Sanghamitra Mishra : Rs. 1,68,259/- 6. The Assessing Officer observed that the founding members are required to work to attend the objects of the trust and not to enrich has been misused for payment of remuneration

ORISSA COMPUTER ACADEMY,BHUBANESWAR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1(2), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical

Bench: S/Shri N.S Saini & Pavan Kumar Gadale

57,728/- 2. Smt. Sarmistha Rath` : Rs. 3,82,456/- 3. Sri Subrat Prasanna Mishra: Rs. 4,34,561/- 4. Smt. Sanghamitra Mishra : Rs. 1,68,259/- 6. The Assessing Officer observed that the founding members are required to work to attend the objects of the trust and not to enrich has been misused for payment of remuneration

ORISSA COMPUTER ACADEMY,BHUBANESWAR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-2(1), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical

Bench: S/Shri N.S Saini & Pavan Kumar Gadale

57,728/- 2. Smt. Sarmistha Rath` : Rs. 3,82,456/- 3. Sri Subrat Prasanna Mishra: Rs. 4,34,561/- 4. Smt. Sanghamitra Mishra : Rs. 1,68,259/- 6. The Assessing Officer observed that the founding members are required to work to attend the objects of the trust and not to enrich has been misused for payment of remuneration