SRI SUKHAMAYA DAS,BHUBANESWAR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-3(1), BHUBANESWAR
In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed
ITA 232/CTK/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack14 Jun 2021AY 2013-14
Bench: Shri Shri Chandra Mohan Garg, Judicialassessment Year : 2013-14 Sri Sukhmaya Das, Sri Sukhmaya Das, At-N/3/69, Vs. Dcit, Circle -3(1), 3(1), Irc Irc Village, Village, Nayapalli, Nayapalli, Bhubaneswar. Bhubaneswar Pan/Gir No. Aeppd 2993 A Aeppd 2993 A (Appellant) (Appellant .. ( Respondent Respondent) Assessee By : Shri J.M.Pattnaik, Ar , Ar Revenue By : Shri S.C. Mohanty, Dr Dr Date Of Hearing : 28/05/ 2021 1 Date Of Pronouncement : 14 /06/20 /2021 O R D E R
For Appellant: Shri J.M.Pattnaik, ARFor Respondent: Shri S.C. Mohanty, DR
Section 68Section 80C
2 | 10
Assessment Year : 2013-14
bank account, the unexplained cash deposits of Rs.29,56,900/-
(Rs.31,41,900 – Rs.1,85,000) was added to the total income of the assessee u/s.68 of the Act, which was upheld in first appeal.
5. I find that the ld CIT(A) has dismissed the appeal of the assessee exparte without hearing
