BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 250(6)clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka427Mumbai390Delhi236Bangalore141Chennai118Kolkata87Pune87Ahmedabad79Jaipur71Hyderabad69Chandigarh44Amritsar43Cochin39Visakhapatnam21Indore19Rajkot19Nagpur18Agra17Allahabad17Patna17Calcutta16Surat15Lucknow15Raipur13Jodhpur9Cuttack9Panaji5Jabalpur4Guwahati4Telangana4Ranchi3Varanasi3Rajasthan3Dehradun2SC1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 11(2)16Section 25011Section 143(1)(a)10Section 6810Section 1548Section 143(1)8Section 12A7Exemption7Section 119(2)(b)6

SUKANTI EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST,SONEPUR vs. ITO,EXEMPTION WARD, SAMBALPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 51/CTK/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack12 Jun 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy(Kz) & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 10Section 12ASection 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 144Section 250Section 57

250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) for AY 2016-17 dated 09.12.2024, I.T.A. No.: 51/CTK/2025 Assessment Year: 2016-17 Sukanti Educational and Charitable Trust. which has been passed against the assessment order u/s 144 of the Act, dated 18.12.2018. 2. The assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal raising the following grounds

Deduction5
Charitable Trust4
Disallowance3

JOHARIMAL HIGH SCHOOL,CUTTACK vs. ITO EXEMPTION, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 135/CTK/2021[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack09 Mar 2022AY 2018-2019

Bench: S/ S/Shri Chandra Mohan Garg, Judicial & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpiaassessment Year : 2018-19 Joharimal High School, Joharimal High School, Vs. Ito (Exemptions), Ito (Exemptions), Ganesh Ganesh Ghat, Ghat, Po: Po: Cuttack Chandinchowk, Cuttack Chandinchowk, Cuttack Pan/Gir No. No.Aaatj 3292 R (Appellant (Appellant) .. ( Respondent Respondent) Assessee By Assessee By : Shri P.K.Mishra & R.K.Jhunjhunwala P.K.Mishra & R.K.Jhunjhunwala, Ars Revenue By : Shri Sovesh Chandra Mohanty, Chandra Mohanty, (Dr) Date Of Hearing : 2/3/ 20 / 2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 09/ /3/2022 O R D E R Per C.M.Garg G, Jm

For Appellant: Shri P.K.Mishra, and R.K.JhunjhunwalaFor Respondent: Shri Sovesh Chandra Mohanty
Section 10Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 250

250 dismissing the appeal filed by the assessee where P a g e 1 | 7 Assessment Year : 2018-19 all required data, details and information are available in the ITR filed by the assessee. 3. For that the ld CIT has erred both in law and fact by upholding the order dated 26.9.2019 passed under section143(1) of the Income

SRI SUKHAMAYA DAS,BHUBANESWAR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-3(1), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 232/CTK/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack14 Jun 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Shri Chandra Mohan Garg, Judicialassessment Year : 2013-14 Sri Sukhmaya Das, Sri Sukhmaya Das, At-N/3/69, Vs. Dcit, Circle -3(1), 3(1), Irc Irc Village, Village, Nayapalli, Nayapalli, Bhubaneswar. Bhubaneswar Pan/Gir No. Aeppd 2993 A Aeppd 2993 A (Appellant) (Appellant .. ( Respondent Respondent) Assessee By : Shri J.M.Pattnaik, Ar , Ar Revenue By : Shri S.C. Mohanty, Dr Dr Date Of Hearing : 28/05/ 2021 1 Date Of Pronouncement : 14 /06/20 /2021 O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri J.M.Pattnaik, ARFor Respondent: Shri S.C. Mohanty, DR
Section 68Section 80C

Charitable Trust (supra). Ld D.R. did not object to the hearing of appeal on merits,. Accordingly, I proceed to decide the appeal on merits after hearing both the parties. 7. At the outset, ld A.R. of the assessee submitted that the Assessing Officer has invoked wrong section i.e. section 68, which is not attracted in the present case. Since

WOMEN ORGANISATION FOR SOCIO CULTURAL AWARNESS,KEONJHAR vs. ITO,EXEMPTIONS, CUTTACK

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 67/CTK/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack22 May 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy(Kz) & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 119(2)(b)Section 139Section 143(1)Section 250

6,99,70,607 in the Intimation under section 143(1) of the Act vide DIN: CPC/2223/B7/410451517 dated 29.12.2023 together with Demand Reference No: 2023202237232529401T 05. That aggrieved by the computation of income and the demands raised as stated in Para-04 above, the assessee carried appeal to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). This apart the assessee made

GRAM VIKAS TRUST,BERHAMPUR vs. ITO, EXEMPTION WARD, BERAMPUR

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee for AYs 2014-

ITA 436/CTK/2024[AY 2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack12 Jun 2025

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy(Kz) & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 11(2)Section 119(2)(b)Section 143(1)(a)Section 154Section 234BSection 250

250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) for AYs 2014-15 & 2015- 16 dated 24.08.2024, which have been passed against the rectification orders u/s 154 of the Act, dated 19.12.2016. Since the issues are common, both the appeals were heard together and are being decided vide this common order for the sake of convenience

GRAM VIKAS TRUST,BERHAMPUR vs. ITO,EXEMPTION WARD, BERAMPUR

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee for AYs 2014-

ITA 437/CTK/2024[AY 2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack12 Jun 2025

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy(Kz) & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 11(2)Section 119(2)(b)Section 143(1)(a)Section 154Section 234BSection 250

250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) for AYs 2014-15 & 2015- 16 dated 24.08.2024, which have been passed against the rectification orders u/s 154 of the Act, dated 19.12.2016. Since the issues are common, both the appeals were heard together and are being decided vide this common order for the sake of convenience

ODISHA INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION(IDCO),BHUBANESWAR vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-4(1), BHUBANESWAR, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 365/CTK/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack11 Nov 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Manish Agarwalआयकर अपील सं/Ita No.365/Ctk/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2015-2016) M/S Odisha Industrial Infrastructure Vs Dcit, Circle-4(1), Bhubaneswar Development Corporation, Idco Tower, Janpath, Bhubaneswar Pan No. : Aaaat 2619 K (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) .. (""यथ" / Respondent) िनधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Bibekananda Mohanty, Ca राज"व क" ओर से /Revenue By : Dr. Abani Kanta Nayak, Cit-Dr सुनवाई क" तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 12/11/2024 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 12/11/2024 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld. Cit(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi, Dated 25.05.2023, Passed In Appeal No.Cit(A), Bhubaneswar-2/10971/2017-18 Vide Din & Order No.Itba/Nfac/S/250/2023-24/1053183739(1) For The Assessment Year 2015-2016. 2. On Perusal Of The Appeal Record, We Found That The Appeal Of The Assessee Has Been Filed Belatedly By 409 Days. In This Regard, The Assessee Has Filed Condonation Application Along With Affidavit Stating Sufficient Reasons For Delay In Filing The Present Appeal. The Contents Of The Affidavit Filed By The Assessee Are As Under :-

For Appellant: Shri Bibekananda Mohanty, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Abani Kanta Nayak, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 37(1)Section 40

250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is against law, weight of evidences and probabilities of the case. 2. The appellant being a Public Sector Enterprise spend every year for public purposes as per decision of the Board / State Government for various social development activities. However, IDCO not being a company registered under Companies Act provisions of restrictions on such

JEEVAN KALYANA SADHANA KENDRA,KOLKATA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION, SAMBALPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 195/CTK/2025[2023-24]Status: HeardITAT Cuttack28 May 2025AY 2023-24

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy(Kz) & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 11Section 119(2)(b)Section 12ASection 12A(1)(b)Section 143(1)Section 250

250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) for AY 2023-24 dated 30.01.2025, which has been passed against the intimation order u/s 143(1) of the Act, dated 13.12.2024. I.T.A. No.: 195/CTK/2025 Assessment Year: 2023-24 Jeevan Kalyana Sadhana Kendra. 2. The assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal raising the following grounds

SWITCHTECH INCUBATOR FOUNDATION,KHORDA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 676/CTK/2025[2026-27]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack09 Feb 2026AY 2026-27

Bench: ITAT. The Ld. counsel submitted that merely for non-submission of financial statement should not be taken base for rejecting of the Form 10AB filed by the assessee for registration of the trust u/s 12AB. He requested and undertook that if one more chance be given to the assessee to produce documents as desired by the Ld. CIT(E). the assessee will comply for the documents.4. On the other hand, the Ld. DR relied on the order of lower authorities.5. Considering the rival submissions and perusi

For Respondent: Sh. Ashim Kumar Chakraborty
Section 10BSection 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 250

250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter “the Act”) by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Hyd [hereafter “the Ld. CIT(E)] dated 20.11.2025, DIN & Notice No. ITBA/EXM/F/EXM45/2025- 26/1082828059(1) for not granting registration u/s 12AB of the Act. 2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the assessee has filed an application in Form