M/S. NABADIGANT EDUCATIONAL TRUST,BHUBANESWAR vs. ITO, WARD-2(1), BHUBANESWAR, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are dismissed

trust existed solely for educational purpose and not for the purpose of profit. 13. Placing rejoinder to the above, ld. AR submitted that even if there is a single instance of violation of provisions of Section 13 of the Act, then also as per the provisions of Section 164(2) of the Act as already relied

ROLAND INSTITUTE OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES,GANJAM vs. CHEIF CIT, BHUBANESWAR

Appeals are allowed in above terms

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

2) of the :- 47 -: ITA No. 368/CTK/2019 and others Roland Educational & Charitable Trust, Berahampur LT. Act, 196\ would fall in the tax-net and the other income of the appellant trust would remain exempt as per the provisions of section 11 ofthe LT. Act, 1961. Having submitted the above the appellant would like to rebut the allegations

ROLAND INSTITUTE OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES,GANJAM vs. CHEIF CIT, BHUBANESWAR

Appeals are allowed in above terms

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

2) of the :- 47 -: ITA No. 368/CTK/2019 and others Roland Educational & Charitable Trust, Berahampur LT. Act, 196\ would fall in the tax-net and the other income of the appellant trust would remain exempt as per the provisions of section 11 ofthe LT. Act, 1961. Having submitted the above the appellant would like to rebut the allegations

ROLAND EDUCATIONAL & CHARITABLE TRUST,BERHAMPUR vs. DCIT, BERHAMPUR CIRCLE, BERHAMPUR

Appeals are allowed in above terms

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

2) of the :- 47 -: ITA No. 368/CTK/2019 and others Roland Educational & Charitable Trust, Berahampur LT. Act, 196\ would fall in the tax-net and the other income of the appellant trust would remain exempt as per the provisions of section 11 ofthe LT. Act, 1961. Having submitted the above the appellant would like to rebut the allegations

ROLAND EDUCATIONAL & CHARITABLE TRUST,BERHAMPUR vs. DCIT, BERHAMPUR CIRCLE, BERHAMPUR

Appeals are allowed in above terms

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

2) of the :- 47 -: ITA No. 368/CTK/2019 and others Roland Educational & Charitable Trust, Berahampur LT. Act, 196\ would fall in the tax-net and the other income of the appellant trust would remain exempt as per the provisions of section 11 ofthe LT. Act, 1961. Having submitted the above the appellant would like to rebut the allegations

ROLAND EDUCATIONAL & CHARITABLE TRUST,BERHAMPUR vs. DCIT, BERHAMPUR CIRCLE, BERHAMPUR

Appeals are allowed in above terms

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

2) of the :- 47 -: ITA No. 368/CTK/2019 and others Roland Educational & Charitable Trust, Berahampur LT. Act, 196\ would fall in the tax-net and the other income of the appellant trust would remain exempt as per the provisions of section 11 ofthe LT. Act, 1961. Having submitted the above the appellant would like to rebut the allegations

ROLAND EDUCATIONAL & CHARITABLE TRUST,GANJAM vs. CHEIF CIT, BHUBANESWAR

Appeals are allowed in above terms

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

2) of the :- 47 -: ITA No. 368/CTK/2019 and others Roland Educational & Charitable Trust, Berahampur LT. Act, 196\ would fall in the tax-net and the other income of the appellant trust would remain exempt as per the provisions of section 11 ofthe LT. Act, 1961. Having submitted the above the appellant would like to rebut the allegations

ROLAND EDUCATIONAL & CHARITABLE TRUST,GANJAM vs. CHEIF CIT, BHUBANESWAR

Appeals are allowed in above terms

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

2) of the :- 47 -: ITA No. 368/CTK/2019 and others Roland Educational & Charitable Trust, Berahampur LT. Act, 196\ would fall in the tax-net and the other income of the appellant trust would remain exempt as per the provisions of section 11 ofthe LT. Act, 1961. Having submitted the above the appellant would like to rebut the allegations

ROLAND INSTITUTE OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES,GANJAM vs. CHEIF CIT, BHUBANESWAR

Appeals are allowed in above terms

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

2) of the :- 47 -: ITA No. 368/CTK/2019 and others Roland Educational & Charitable Trust, Berahampur LT. Act, 196\ would fall in the tax-net and the other income of the appellant trust would remain exempt as per the provisions of section 11 ofthe LT. Act, 1961. Having submitted the above the appellant would like to rebut the allegations

ROLAND INSTITUTE OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES,GANJAM vs. CHEIF CIT, BHUBANESWAR

Appeals are allowed in above terms

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

2) of the :- 47 -: ITA No. 368/CTK/2019 and others Roland Educational & Charitable Trust, Berahampur LT. Act, 196\ would fall in the tax-net and the other income of the appellant trust would remain exempt as per the provisions of section 11 ofthe LT. Act, 1961. Having submitted the above the appellant would like to rebut the allegations

ROLAND EDUCATIONAL & CHARITABLE TRUST,GANJAM vs. CHEIF CIT, BHUBANESWAR

Appeals are allowed in above terms

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

2) of the :- 47 -: ITA No. 368/CTK/2019 and others Roland Educational & Charitable Trust, Berahampur LT. Act, 196\ would fall in the tax-net and the other income of the appellant trust would remain exempt as per the provisions of section 11 ofthe LT. Act, 1961. Having submitted the above the appellant would like to rebut the allegations

ROLAND EDUCATIONAL & CHARITABLE TRUST,GANJAM vs. CHEIF CIT, BHUBANESWAR

Appeals are allowed in above terms

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

2) of the :- 47 -: ITA No. 368/CTK/2019 and others Roland Educational & Charitable Trust, Berahampur LT. Act, 196\ would fall in the tax-net and the other income of the appellant trust would remain exempt as per the provisions of section 11 ofthe LT. Act, 1961. Having submitted the above the appellant would like to rebut the allegations

ROLAND INSTITUTE OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES,GANJAM vs. CHEIF CIT, BHUBANESWAR

Appeals are allowed in above terms

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

2) of the :- 47 -: ITA No. 368/CTK/2019 and others Roland Educational & Charitable Trust, Berahampur LT. Act, 196\ would fall in the tax-net and the other income of the appellant trust would remain exempt as per the provisions of section 11 ofthe LT. Act, 1961. Having submitted the above the appellant would like to rebut the allegations

ROLAND EDUCATIONAL & CHARITABLE TRUST,GANJAM vs. CHEIF CIT, BHUBANESWAR

Appeals are allowed in above terms

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

2) of the :- 47 -: ITA No. 368/CTK/2019 and others Roland Educational & Charitable Trust, Berahampur LT. Act, 196\ would fall in the tax-net and the other income of the appellant trust would remain exempt as per the provisions of section 11 ofthe LT. Act, 1961. Having submitted the above the appellant would like to rebut the allegations

M/S. ORISSA CRICKET ASSOCIATION,CUTTACK vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-2(1), CUTTACK

In the result, ITA No.335/CTK/2017 is allowed and ITA

Bench: Shri N.S.Saini, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm Orissa Cricket Association Vs. Cit(Exemptions), Barabati Stadium,Cuttack-753001, Hyderabad Odisha, Pan No. : Aaaao 0319 F & Orissa Cricket Association Vs. Acit, Circle-2(1), Barabati Stadium, Cuttack Cuttack-753001, Odisha Pan No. : Aaaao 0319 F (अपीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. निर्धाऩिती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri S.K.Tulsiyan & D.Das, Ar राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Saad Kidwai, Citdr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 12/12/2017 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement 26/12/2017 आदेश / O R D E R Per Shri N.S.Saini, Am:

trust and he may also make such inquiries as he may deem necessary for the said purpose. The section does not mandate anything beyond this. In the above context, it is firstly stated that following the prescribed guidelines as laid in section 12AA of the Act r.w.Rule 17A, the appellant applied for registration u/s.12A(1) of the Act with

M/S. MAHASAKTI FOUNDATION,KALAHANDI vs. ACIT, SAMBALPUR

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: S/Shri N.S Saini & Pavan Kumar Gadale

14. The second proviso to section 12AA(2) categorically provides that when subsequently registration u/s.12AA of the Act is granted to a charitable institution then assessment of an assessment year earlier to that assessment year for which registration has been granted shall not be reopened on the ground that such institution was not granted registration in an earlier assessment year

ACIT (EXEMPTIONS), BHUBANESWAR vs. M/S. PEOPLES FORUM, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue and cross objections filed

Bench: Shri N.S Sainiassessment Year :2009-2010 Acit (Exemptions), Aayakar Vs. M/S. Peoples Forum, Plot Bhavan, Bhubaneswar. No.Hig 44, Dharma Vihar, Khandagiri, Bhubaneswar Pan/Gir No. Aaatp 2214 R (Appellant) .. ( Respondent)

trust or otherwise to feed charity would not disentitle or negate the claim of engagement in charitable purpose defined under Section 2 15 For the application of Section 2(15) to charitable entity engaged in "any other object of general public utility ", various Hon 'ble Courts have earlier held profit motive' and 'an element of reciprocity in business transactions

DCIT (EXEMPTIONS), BHUBANESWAR vs. M/S. S.M.CHARITABLE EDUCATIONAL TRUST, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the revenue are dismissed

Bench: S/Shri N.S Saini & Pavan Kumar Gadale

section 11 of the Act to the appellant. The Hon’ble Tribunal affirmed the order of the CIT(Appeals) directing A.O. to allow exemption u/s.11 and dismissed the appeal of the Revenue vide the above oder. For the previous year relevant to the A.Y. 2009-10, under consideration, the A.O. denied the exemption claimed u/s.ll in the year under consideration