BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 142clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka429Mumbai353Delhi286Chennai126Bangalore123Jaipur117Hyderabad78Chandigarh75Ahmedabad72Kolkata67Pune59Lucknow27Indore24Visakhapatnam22Allahabad21Surat20Calcutta16Cochin12Patna12Agra10Rajkot9Nagpur9Cuttack8Telangana8Jodhpur7Ranchi6Guwahati6Raipur5Dehradun5SC5Amritsar3Rajasthan3Panaji2Varanasi2Andhra Pradesh1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 12A13Section 2638Section 80G(5)(vi)8Exemption6Section 143(2)5Section 2(15)4Section 115B4Section 114Section 142(1)3

SUKANTI EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST,SONEPUR vs. ITO,EXEMPTION WARD, SAMBALPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 51/CTK/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack12 Jun 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy(Kz) & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 10Section 12ASection 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 144Section 250Section 57

Charitable Trust. which has been passed against the assessment order u/s 144 of the Act, dated 18.12.2018. 2. The assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal raising the following grounds of appeal: “1. That, the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) committed an error of law in not allowing the expenditure of ₹ 2,38,55,184 incurred for running

Charitable Trust3
Depreciation2

DHANESWAR RATH INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND MEDICAL SCIENCES,CUTTACK vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assesse is allowed

ITA 134/CTK/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack17 May 2022AY 2016-17
For Appellant: Shri D.Parida/C.ParidaFor Respondent: Shri M.K.Goutam
Section 11Section 143(3)Section 263

trust income for charitable purposes. This aspect has not been examined by the AO while passing the assessment order u/s.143(3), therefore, the Ld CIT(E) was justified in directing the AO to redo the assessment order. 14. Ld CIT DR submitted that the assessee has not submitted the copy of reply before the Bench and it is not also

KALINGA INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION TRUST,BHUBANESWAR vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee trust are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 202/CTK/2019[2019-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack19 Nov 2019AY 2019-10

Bench: Shri Before Shri Chandra Mohan Garg, Judicial & Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri G.Naik/Rajat KarFor Respondent: Shri S.M.Keshkamat
Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 80G(5)(vi)

142, Kanan Vihar, PO: Patia, Hyderabad Hyderabad-500004 Bhubaneswar. Bhubaneswar. PAN/GIR No. No.AADTK 3143 R (Appellant (Appellant) .. ( Respondent Respondent) Assessee by : Shri G.Naik/Rajat Kar G.Naik/Rajat Kar, ARs Revenue by : Shri S.M.Keshkamat .M.Keshkamat, CIT DR Date of Hearing : 14/ /11/ 2019 Date of Pronouncement : 19 / /11/ 2019 O R D E R Per C.M.Garg,JM C.M.Garg,JM Both

KALINGA INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION TRUST,BHUBANESWAR vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee trust are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 203/CTK/2019[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack19 Nov 2019AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Before Shri Chandra Mohan Garg, Judicial & Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri G.Naik/Rajat KarFor Respondent: Shri S.M.Keshkamat
Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 80G(5)(vi)

142, Kanan Vihar, PO: Patia, Hyderabad Hyderabad-500004 Bhubaneswar. Bhubaneswar. PAN/GIR No. No.AADTK 3143 R (Appellant (Appellant) .. ( Respondent Respondent) Assessee by : Shri G.Naik/Rajat Kar G.Naik/Rajat Kar, ARs Revenue by : Shri S.M.Keshkamat .M.Keshkamat, CIT DR Date of Hearing : 14/ /11/ 2019 Date of Pronouncement : 19 / /11/ 2019 O R D E R Per C.M.Garg,JM C.M.Garg,JM Both

TRIDENT ACADEMY OF CREATIVE TECHNOLOGY,BHUBANESWAR vs. CIT(EXEMPTIONS), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 209/CTK/2023[2018-19]Status: HeardITAT Cuttack15 Jul 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Before Shri George Mathan, Judicial & Manish Agarwal Manish Agarwalassessment Year : 2018-19 Trident Academy Of Creative Trident Academy Of Creative Vs. Cit (Exemption), Cit (Exemption), Technology, Technology, A A-127, Hyderabad Hyderabad Sahidnagar, Bhubaneswar Sahidnagar, Bhubaneswar Pan/Gir No Pan/Gir No.Aabtt 0273 H (Appellant (Appellant) .. ( Respondent Respondent) Assessee By : Shri P.C.Sethi, Adv Revenue By : Shri Sanjay Kumar, Cit Sanjay Kumar, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing : 15/0 07/2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 15/0 /07/2024 O R D E R Per Bench This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Ord This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Ord This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld Cit(Exemption), Hyderabad Cit(Exemption), Hyderabad Dated 29.3.2023 Passed Under Section 263 Of 29.3.2023 Passed Under Section 263 Of The Act In Appeal No,Itba/Rev/F/Rev5/2022 The Act In Appeal No,Itba/Rev/F/Rev5/2022-23/1051543667(1) 23/1051543667(1) For The Assessment Year Assessment Year 2018-19. 2. Shri P.C.Sethi, P.C.Sethi, Ld Ar Appeared For The Assessee & Shri The Assessee & Shri Sanjay Kumar, Cit Dr Appeared For The Revenue. Dr Appeared For The Revenue.

For Appellant: Shri P.C.SethiFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Kumar, CIT
Section 142Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263

charitable society which is imparting engineering st is imparting engineering studies. It was the submission that for the . It was the submission that for the P a g e 1 | 7 Assessment Year : 2018-19 relevant assessment year, the assessee had filed its return of income on 23.10.2018. The return of income came to be processed u/s.143

SUNDERGARH EDUCATIONAL TRUST,AT- SANKARA, SUNDARGARH vs. ITO, EXEMPTION- WARD, SAMBALPUR, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, SAMBALPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee stands partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 156/CTK/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack30 May 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Before Shri George Mathan, Judicialassessment Year : 2016-17 Sundargarh Educational Vs. Ito, Ito, Exemption, Exemption, Ward, Ward, Trust, , At At-Sankara, Sambalpur Sambalpur Sundargarh Pan/Gir No Pan/Gir No.Aajts 8670 H (Appellant (Appellant) .. ( Respondent Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Sandeep Kumar Jena, Adv Sandeep Kumar Jena, Adv Revenue By : Shri Charan Dass, Ld Sr Dr , Ld Sr Dr Date Of Hearing : 30/0 05/2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 30/0 /05/2024 O R D E R This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Aga This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld Inst The Order Of The Ld Cit(A), Nfac Dated 5.2.2024 In Appeal No.Cit(A) Sambalpur/10173/2018 Sambalpur/10173/2018- 19 For The Assessment Year For The Assessment Year 2016-17. 2. Shri Sandeep Sandeep Kumar Jena, Ld Ar Appeared For Appeared For The Assessee. Shri Charan Dass, Ld Sr Dr , Ld Sr Dr Represented On Behalf Of The Revenue. Represented On Behalf Of The Revenue.

For Appellant: Shri Sandeep Kumar Jena, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Charan Dass, ld Sr DR
Section 12ASection 143(2)Section 144

trust, imparting education by running a school and also involves in other charitable activit education by running a school and also involves in other charitable activit education by running a school and also involves in other charitable activities and registered under section 12AA(1)(b)(i) of the Act. The registration has and registered under section 12AA

SOCIETY FOR THE WELFARE OF WEAKER SECTIONS,GAJAPATI vs. DCIT, BERHAMPUR CIRCLE, BERHAMPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee with regard to ground Nos

ITA 345/CTK/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack16 Jan 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.345/Ctk/2016 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2010-2011) Society For The Welfare Of Vs. Dcit, Berhampur Circle, Weaker Sections, Berhampur Near Dfo Office, Ramsagar Road, Parlakhemundi-761200, Odisha स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aacts 4037 K (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधाारिती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri P.K.Harichandan, Advocate िाजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri J.K.Lenka, Dr सुनवाई की तािीख / Date Of Hearing : 15/11/2019 घोषणा की तािीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 16/01/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per L.P.Sahu, Am: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Cit(A)-3, Bhubaneswar, Dated 26.05.2016 For Assessment Year 2010- 2011. 2. The Assessee Has Filed Concised Grounds Of Appeal, Which Read As Under :- 1. That, The Addition Of Rs.60,000/- On Account Of Donation, By The Id.Ao As Well As Confirmed By The Id Cit (A) Treating The Same, As Anonymous Donation U/S 115Bbc Of The It Act Is Arbitrary .Excessive & Bad In Law. 2. That, The Id. Ao As Well As Cit(A), Without Properly Appreciating The Facts Of The Case & Verifying The Books Of Accounts, Has Wrongly Added Towards Indirect Income Rs. 14,46,915/- Treating The Same, As Income From Unexplained Source In The Nature

For Appellant: Shri P.K.Harichandan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri J.K.Lenka, DR
Section 11Section 115BSection 12ASection 143(2)Section 234

trust registered u/s.12A of I.T.Act, 1961 and filed its return of income for A.Y.2010- 2011 on 30.09.2010 declaring total income at Rs.Nil, which was selected for scrutiny. Subsequently, the AO issued statutory notices u/s.143(2) & 142(1) of the Act. Accordingly, the AO completed the assessment making addition of Rs.60,000/- u/s.115BC of the Act, Rs.14,46,915/- on account

P RAMA RAO,NAWARANGPUR vs. ITO, JEYPORE WARD, JEYPORE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 389/CTK/2004[1993-94]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack01 Feb 2022AY 1993-94

Bench: Shri P.M.Jagtap & Shri C.M.Garg(Through : Video Conferencing) P.Rama Rao, Vs Cit, Bhubaneswar Prop. Of M/S Om Traders, At-Pathana Street, Po-Nawarangpur, Dist-Nawarangpur-764059 Pan No. : (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. यनधागररती की ओर से /Assessee By Shri Jagamohan Pattanaik, Adv. : राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri M.K.Gautam, Citdr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 04/01/2022 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 02/02/2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Passed By The Cit, Bhubaneswar U/S.263 Of The Act, Dated 31.03.2004. 2. We Have Heard The Arguments Of Both The Sides & Perused The Relevant Record Of The Tribunal Including The Paper Book Filed By The Assessee Spread Over 77 Pages Along With The Written Submissions Filed On 03.01.2022. 3. Replying To The Above, Ld. Cit-Dr Also Filed Written Submissions & Copies Of The Case Laws/Judgments/Orders In Support Of The Stand Of The Revenue.

For Respondent: Shri M.K.Gautam, CITDR
Section 246Section 251Section 254Section 263

Charitable Trust in R/Tax Appeal NO.1335 of2018 order dated 30.7.2019 in paras 16 & 17 of the said judgment is referred to as under: "16. There is one another valid reason for us to say that ordinarily the matter should not be remitted by the Appellate Tribunal to the Id CIT(A) if the Appellate Tribunal is in a position