BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

27 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 10(34)clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka514Delhi490Mumbai436Chennai232Bangalore174Pune122Jaipur107Ahmedabad85Hyderabad77Kolkata69Chandigarh65Lucknow52Surat46Indore41Cochin37Allahabad33Amritsar30Visakhapatnam27Cuttack27Jodhpur26Raipur18Agra17Calcutta17Panaji15Nagpur15Rajkot12Telangana12SC8Varanasi6Kerala5Dehradun3Rajasthan3Patna2Orissa2Andhra Pradesh2Jabalpur2T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Punjab & Haryana1Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 1042Section 1131Section 26319Charitable Trust18Section 11(2)16Section 26012Section 12A11Section 143(1)(a)10Exemption10

ROLAND EDUCATIONAL & CHARITABLE TRUST,GANJAM vs. CHEIF CIT, BHUBANESWAR

Appeals are allowed in above terms

ITA 264/CTK/2019[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack15 Feb 2021AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri S.K. TulsiyanFor Respondent: Shri M.K. Goutham, CIT-DR
Section 10

section 10(23C)(vi) relief approval raised in the appeals in ITA Nos. 368/H/2019, 258/H/2019, 259/H/2019, 260/H/2019, 261/H/2019, 262/H/2019, 263/H/2019, 264/H/2019, 265/H/2019, 266/H/2019, 267/H/2019, 268/H/2019, 269/H/2019, and 270/H/2019. All the aforesaid appeals are allowed therefore. :- 33 -: ITA No. 368/CTK/2019 and others Roland Educational & Charitable Trust, Berahampur 9. Coming to the remaining three appeals ITA nos. 469- 471/CTK/2019, the assessee

ROLAND EDUCATIONAL & CHARITABLE TRUST,BERHAMPUR vs. DCIT, BERHAMPUR CIRCLE, BERHAMPUR

Appeals are allowed in above terms

Showing 1–20 of 27 · Page 1 of 2

Section 1548
Deduction7
Disallowance7
ITA 470/CTK/2019[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack15 Feb 2021AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri S.K. TulsiyanFor Respondent: Shri M.K. Goutham, CIT-DR
Section 10

section 10(23C)(vi) relief approval raised in the appeals in ITA Nos. 368/H/2019, 258/H/2019, 259/H/2019, 260/H/2019, 261/H/2019, 262/H/2019, 263/H/2019, 264/H/2019, 265/H/2019, 266/H/2019, 267/H/2019, 268/H/2019, 269/H/2019, and 270/H/2019. All the aforesaid appeals are allowed therefore. :- 33 -: ITA No. 368/CTK/2019 and others Roland Educational & Charitable Trust, Berahampur 9. Coming to the remaining three appeals ITA nos. 469- 471/CTK/2019, the assessee

ROLAND INSTITUTE OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES,GANJAM vs. CHEIF CIT, BHUBANESWAR

Appeals are allowed in above terms

ITA 270/CTK/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack15 Feb 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri S.K. TulsiyanFor Respondent: Shri M.K. Goutham, CIT-DR
Section 10

section 10(23C)(vi) relief approval raised in the appeals in ITA Nos. 368/H/2019, 258/H/2019, 259/H/2019, 260/H/2019, 261/H/2019, 262/H/2019, 263/H/2019, 264/H/2019, 265/H/2019, 266/H/2019, 267/H/2019, 268/H/2019, 269/H/2019, and 270/H/2019. All the aforesaid appeals are allowed therefore. :- 33 -: ITA No. 368/CTK/2019 and others Roland Educational & Charitable Trust, Berahampur 9. Coming to the remaining three appeals ITA nos. 469- 471/CTK/2019, the assessee

ROLAND INSTITUTE OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES,GANJAM vs. CHEIF CIT, BHUBANESWAR

Appeals are allowed in above terms

ITA 268/CTK/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack15 Feb 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri S.K. TulsiyanFor Respondent: Shri M.K. Goutham, CIT-DR
Section 10

section 10(23C)(vi) relief approval raised in the appeals in ITA Nos. 368/H/2019, 258/H/2019, 259/H/2019, 260/H/2019, 261/H/2019, 262/H/2019, 263/H/2019, 264/H/2019, 265/H/2019, 266/H/2019, 267/H/2019, 268/H/2019, 269/H/2019, and 270/H/2019. All the aforesaid appeals are allowed therefore. :- 33 -: ITA No. 368/CTK/2019 and others Roland Educational & Charitable Trust, Berahampur 9. Coming to the remaining three appeals ITA nos. 469- 471/CTK/2019, the assessee

RONALD EDUCATIONAL & CHARITABLE TRUST,GANJAM vs. CHEIF CIT, BHUBANESWAR

Appeals are allowed in above terms

ITA 368/CTK/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack15 Feb 2021AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri S.K. TulsiyanFor Respondent: Shri M.K. Goutham, CIT-DR
Section 10

section 10(23C)(vi) relief approval raised in the appeals in ITA Nos. 368/H/2019, 258/H/2019, 259/H/2019, 260/H/2019, 261/H/2019, 262/H/2019, 263/H/2019, 264/H/2019, 265/H/2019, 266/H/2019, 267/H/2019, 268/H/2019, 269/H/2019, and 270/H/2019. All the aforesaid appeals are allowed therefore. :- 33 -: ITA No. 368/CTK/2019 and others Roland Educational & Charitable Trust, Berahampur 9. Coming to the remaining three appeals ITA nos. 469- 471/CTK/2019, the assessee

ROLAND EDUCATIONAL & CHARITABLE TRUST,GANJAM vs. CHEIF CIT, BHUBANESWAR

Appeals are allowed in above terms

ITA 262/CTK/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack15 Feb 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri S.K. TulsiyanFor Respondent: Shri M.K. Goutham, CIT-DR
Section 10

section 10(23C)(vi) relief approval raised in the appeals in ITA Nos. 368/H/2019, 258/H/2019, 259/H/2019, 260/H/2019, 261/H/2019, 262/H/2019, 263/H/2019, 264/H/2019, 265/H/2019, 266/H/2019, 267/H/2019, 268/H/2019, 269/H/2019, and 270/H/2019. All the aforesaid appeals are allowed therefore. :- 33 -: ITA No. 368/CTK/2019 and others Roland Educational & Charitable Trust, Berahampur 9. Coming to the remaining three appeals ITA nos. 469- 471/CTK/2019, the assessee

ROLAND INSTITUTE OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES,GANJAM vs. CHEIF CIT, BHUBANESWAR

Appeals are allowed in above terms

ITA 267/CTK/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack15 Feb 2021AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri S.K. TulsiyanFor Respondent: Shri M.K. Goutham, CIT-DR
Section 10

section 10(23C)(vi) relief approval raised in the appeals in ITA Nos. 368/H/2019, 258/H/2019, 259/H/2019, 260/H/2019, 261/H/2019, 262/H/2019, 263/H/2019, 264/H/2019, 265/H/2019, 266/H/2019, 267/H/2019, 268/H/2019, 269/H/2019, and 270/H/2019. All the aforesaid appeals are allowed therefore. :- 33 -: ITA No. 368/CTK/2019 and others Roland Educational & Charitable Trust, Berahampur 9. Coming to the remaining three appeals ITA nos. 469- 471/CTK/2019, the assessee

ROLAND EDUCATIONAL & CHARITABLE TRUST,GANJAM vs. CHEIF CIT, BHUBANESWAR

Appeals are allowed in above terms

ITA 263/CTK/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack15 Feb 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri S.K. TulsiyanFor Respondent: Shri M.K. Goutham, CIT-DR
Section 10

section 10(23C)(vi) relief approval raised in the appeals in ITA Nos. 368/H/2019, 258/H/2019, 259/H/2019, 260/H/2019, 261/H/2019, 262/H/2019, 263/H/2019, 264/H/2019, 265/H/2019, 266/H/2019, 267/H/2019, 268/H/2019, 269/H/2019, and 270/H/2019. All the aforesaid appeals are allowed therefore. :- 33 -: ITA No. 368/CTK/2019 and others Roland Educational & Charitable Trust, Berahampur 9. Coming to the remaining three appeals ITA nos. 469- 471/CTK/2019, the assessee

ROLAND INSTITUTE OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES,GANJAM vs. CHEIF CIT, BHUBANESWAR

Appeals are allowed in above terms

ITA 269/CTK/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack15 Feb 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri S.K. TulsiyanFor Respondent: Shri M.K. Goutham, CIT-DR
Section 10

section 10(23C)(vi) relief approval raised in the appeals in ITA Nos. 368/H/2019, 258/H/2019, 259/H/2019, 260/H/2019, 261/H/2019, 262/H/2019, 263/H/2019, 264/H/2019, 265/H/2019, 266/H/2019, 267/H/2019, 268/H/2019, 269/H/2019, and 270/H/2019. All the aforesaid appeals are allowed therefore. :- 33 -: ITA No. 368/CTK/2019 and others Roland Educational & Charitable Trust, Berahampur 9. Coming to the remaining three appeals ITA nos. 469- 471/CTK/2019, the assessee

ROLAND EDUCATIONAL & CHARITABLE TRUST,GANJAM vs. CHEIF CIT, BHUBANESWAR

Appeals are allowed in above terms

ITA 265/CTK/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack15 Feb 2021AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri S.K. TulsiyanFor Respondent: Shri M.K. Goutham, CIT-DR
Section 10

section 10(23C)(vi) relief approval raised in the appeals in ITA Nos. 368/H/2019, 258/H/2019, 259/H/2019, 260/H/2019, 261/H/2019, 262/H/2019, 263/H/2019, 264/H/2019, 265/H/2019, 266/H/2019, 267/H/2019, 268/H/2019, 269/H/2019, and 270/H/2019. All the aforesaid appeals are allowed therefore. :- 33 -: ITA No. 368/CTK/2019 and others Roland Educational & Charitable Trust, Berahampur 9. Coming to the remaining three appeals ITA nos. 469- 471/CTK/2019, the assessee

ROLAND EDUCATIONAL & CHARITABLE TRUST,BERHAMPUR vs. DCIT, BERHAMPUR CIRCLE, BERHAMPUR

Appeals are allowed in above terms

ITA 469/CTK/2019[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack15 Feb 2021AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri S.K. TulsiyanFor Respondent: Shri M.K. Goutham, CIT-DR
Section 10

section 10(23C)(vi) relief approval raised in the appeals in ITA Nos. 368/H/2019, 258/H/2019, 259/H/2019, 260/H/2019, 261/H/2019, 262/H/2019, 263/H/2019, 264/H/2019, 265/H/2019, 266/H/2019, 267/H/2019, 268/H/2019, 269/H/2019, and 270/H/2019. All the aforesaid appeals are allowed therefore. :- 33 -: ITA No. 368/CTK/2019 and others Roland Educational & Charitable Trust, Berahampur 9. Coming to the remaining three appeals ITA nos. 469- 471/CTK/2019, the assessee

ROLAND INSTITUTE OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES,GANJAM vs. CHEIF CIT, BHUBANESWAR

Appeals are allowed in above terms

ITA 266/CTK/2019[2008--09]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack15 Feb 2021

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri S.K. TulsiyanFor Respondent: Shri M.K. Goutham, CIT-DR
Section 10

section 10(23C)(vi) relief approval raised in the appeals in ITA Nos. 368/H/2019, 258/H/2019, 259/H/2019, 260/H/2019, 261/H/2019, 262/H/2019, 263/H/2019, 264/H/2019, 265/H/2019, 266/H/2019, 267/H/2019, 268/H/2019, 269/H/2019, and 270/H/2019. All the aforesaid appeals are allowed therefore. :- 33 -: ITA No. 368/CTK/2019 and others Roland Educational & Charitable Trust, Berahampur 9. Coming to the remaining three appeals ITA nos. 469- 471/CTK/2019, the assessee

ROLAND EDUCATIONAL & CHARITABLE TRUST,GANJAM vs. CHEIF CIT, BHUBANESWAR

Appeals are allowed in above terms

ITA 261/CTK/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack15 Feb 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri S.K. TulsiyanFor Respondent: Shri M.K. Goutham, CIT-DR
Section 10

section 10(23C)(vi) relief approval raised in the appeals in ITA Nos. 368/H/2019, 258/H/2019, 259/H/2019, 260/H/2019, 261/H/2019, 262/H/2019, 263/H/2019, 264/H/2019, 265/H/2019, 266/H/2019, 267/H/2019, 268/H/2019, 269/H/2019, and 270/H/2019. All the aforesaid appeals are allowed therefore. :- 33 -: ITA No. 368/CTK/2019 and others Roland Educational & Charitable Trust, Berahampur 9. Coming to the remaining three appeals ITA nos. 469- 471/CTK/2019, the assessee

ROLAND EDUCATIONAL & CHARITABLE TRUST,BERHAMPUR vs. DCIT, BERHAMPUR CIRCLE, BERHAMPUR

Appeals are allowed in above terms

ITA 471/CTK/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack15 Feb 2021AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri S.K. TulsiyanFor Respondent: Shri M.K. Goutham, CIT-DR
Section 10

section 10(23C)(vi) relief approval raised in the appeals in ITA Nos. 368/H/2019, 258/H/2019, 259/H/2019, 260/H/2019, 261/H/2019, 262/H/2019, 263/H/2019, 264/H/2019, 265/H/2019, 266/H/2019, 267/H/2019, 268/H/2019, 269/H/2019, and 270/H/2019. All the aforesaid appeals are allowed therefore. :- 33 -: ITA No. 368/CTK/2019 and others Roland Educational & Charitable Trust, Berahampur 9. Coming to the remaining three appeals ITA nos. 469- 471/CTK/2019, the assessee

STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD ODISHA,BHUBANESWAR vs. ITO, WARAD 5(2), BHUBANESWAR, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeal of the assessee stands allowed and stay petition stands dismissed

ITA 301/CTK/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack24 Oct 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Before Shri George Mathanmember & Manish Agarwal Manish Agarwals.P.No.11/Ctk/2024 Assessment Year :2017-18 State Pollution Control Board State Pollution Control Board, Vs. Ito, Ward 5(2), Plot No.A-118, Paribesh Bhawan, 118, Paribesh Bhawan, Bhubaneswar Nilakantha Nagar, Agar, Nayapali, Nayapali, Unit-Vii, Bhubaneswar Neswar Pan/Gir No.Aaals 2490 J Aaals 2490 J (Appellant) (Appellant .. ( Respondent Respondent) Assessee By : Shri S.K.Agrawalla, Ca Walla, Ca Revenue By : Shri Sanjay Kumar, Cit Sanjay Kumar, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing : 24/10/20 2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 24/10/20 024 O R D E R Per Bench

For Appellant: Shri S.K.Agrawalla, CA walla, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Kumar, CIT
Section 4

trust or venture capital company or venture capital fund is assessable, without giving effect to the provisions of section 10, exceeds the maximum amount which is not chargeable to income-tax, furnish a return of such income of the previous year in the prescribed form and verified in the prescribed manner and setting forth such other particulars

PARADIP PORT AUTHORITY,JAGATSINGHPUR vs. DCIT,CIRCLE-1(1), CUTTACK

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 209/CTK/2024[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack25 Sept 2024AY 2004-05
Section 11Section 11(1)(a)Section 12ASection 260Section 263

charitable purpose the aggregate sum of Rs. 1.70.369. Leaving a balance of Rs. 87,910. The question is whether the assessee is entitled to accumulate twenty five percent of Rs. 2.57,376 contends, or twenty five percent of Rs. 87,010 as the revenue appeared to contend. 2. Considering the facts of the case and ratio laid down

PARADIP PORT AUTHORITY,JAGATSINGHPUR vs. DCIT,CIRCLE-1(1), CUTTACK

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 208/CTK/2024[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack25 Sept 2024AY 2003-04
Section 11Section 11(1)(a)Section 12ASection 260Section 263

charitable purpose the aggregate sum of Rs. 1.70.369. Leaving a balance of Rs. 87,910. The question is whether the assessee is entitled to accumulate twenty five percent of Rs. 2.57,376 contends, or twenty five percent of Rs. 87,010 as the revenue appeared to contend. 2. Considering the facts of the case and ratio laid down

PARADIP PORT AUTHORITY,JAGATSINGHPUR vs. DCIT,CIRCLE1(1), CUTTACK

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 210/CTK/2024[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack25 Sept 2024AY 2005-06
Section 11Section 11(1)(a)Section 12ASection 260Section 263

charitable purpose the aggregate sum of Rs. 1.70.369. Leaving a balance of Rs. 87,910. The question is whether the assessee is entitled to accumulate twenty five percent of Rs. 2.57,376 contends, or twenty five percent of Rs. 87,010 as the revenue appeared to contend. 2. Considering the facts of the case and ratio laid down

GRAM VIKAS TRUST,BERHAMPUR vs. ITO, EXEMPTION WARD, BERAMPUR

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee for AYs 2014-

ITA 436/CTK/2024[AY 2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack12 Jun 2025

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy(Kz) & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 11(2)Section 119(2)(b)Section 143(1)(a)Section 154Section 234BSection 250

34,731/- while the amount set apart u/s 11(2) of the Act was ₹ 10,45,000/-. The return of income was filed on 26.09.2014 along with Form No. 10B, but Form No. 10 was not uploaded on the same day. This omission was noticed later but, in the meantime the CPC sent the intimation

GRAM VIKAS TRUST,BERHAMPUR vs. ITO,EXEMPTION WARD, BERAMPUR

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee for AYs 2014-

ITA 437/CTK/2024[AY 2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack12 Jun 2025

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy(Kz) & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 11(2)Section 119(2)(b)Section 143(1)(a)Section 154Section 234BSection 250

34,731/- while the amount set apart u/s 11(2) of the Act was ₹ 10,45,000/-. The return of income was filed on 26.09.2014 along with Form No. 10B, but Form No. 10 was not uploaded on the same day. This omission was noticed later but, in the meantime the CPC sent the intimation