Search: capital gains

5 results for “capital gains”+ Survey u/s 133Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 1478 Addition to Income5 Section 271(1)(c)4 Section 143(2)4 Section 1484 Section 374 Section 10(38)4 Reopening of Assessment4 Condonation of Delay

ASHWIN KUMAR AGARWAL,CUTTACK vs. DCIT ASMNT CIRCLE-2(1)CUTTACK, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 507/CTK/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack13 Dec 2024AY 2016-17

Section 10(38)Section 143(3)Section 68

u/s. 10(38)). The difference of opinion for each shares by the CIT(A) is not understandable and also unjustified. In addition to above, copy of the CIT(A) Order and Hon'ble Jurisdictional ITAT Order for the Asst. Year-2015-16 was furnished before the CIT(A) during the course of appeal proceedings. The Ld. CIT(A) stated that

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTAL CIRCLE, SAMBALPUR vs. SMT. INDRANI PATNAIK, ROURKELA

In the result, all the four appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 180/CTK/2020[209-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack11 Dec 2025

ASHWIN KUMAR AGARWAL,CUTTACK vs. DCIT ASMNT CIRCLE-2(1)CUTTACK, CUTTACK

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTAL CIRCLE, SAMBALPUR vs. SMT. INDRANI PATNAIK, ROURKELA

ASHWIN KUMAR AGARWAL,CUTTACK vs. DCIT ASMNT CIRCLE-2(1)CUTTACK, CUTTACK

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTAL CIRCLE, SAMBALPUR vs. SMT. INDRANI PATNAIK, ROURKELA

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, SAMBALPUR vs. SMT. INDRANI PATNAIK, ROURKELA

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTAL CIRCLE, SAMBALPUR vs. SMT. INDRANI PATNAIK, ROURKELA

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, SAMBALPUR vs. SMT. INDRANI PATNAIK, ROURKELA