BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “capital gains”+ Section 50C(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai264Delhi193Jaipur111Hyderabad82Chennai78Ahmedabad72Kolkata58Indore57Surat48Pune43Nagpur39Bangalore37Visakhapatnam29Lucknow27Agra25Chandigarh22Rajkot20Dehradun19Raipur16Patna15Jodhpur11Jabalpur7Cochin6Amritsar6Panaji3Allahabad3Cuttack2Varanasi2Ranchi1Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 50C3Long Term Capital Gains2

LALIT KUMAR JALAN,JALAN PHARMACEUTICALS vs. ITO WARD-1(1), CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed with the directions

ITA 335/CTK/2024[2018-19]Status: HeardITAT Cuttack17 Oct 2024AY 2018-19
Section 142(1)Section 50C

Section 50C(2) of the Act and the AO has also referred the matter to the DVO for computing the fair market value as on the date of sale for the purpose of computing long term capital gain

SUNGREEN VALLEYS PVT. LTD,ROURKELA vs. ACIT CIRCLE, ROURKELA, ROURKELA

In the result, appeal of the assessee stands partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 208/CTK/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack13 Oct 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Before S/Shri George Mathan, Judicial & Rajesh Kumarassessment Year : 2016-17 Sungreen Valleys Pvt Ltd., Sungreen Valleys Pvt Ltd., Vs. Acit, Circle, Rour Acit, Circle, Rourkela T-19, 19, Civil Civil Township, Township, Rourkela. Pan/Gir No. Pan/Gir No.Aaics 6153 M (Appellant (Appellant) .. ( Respondent Respondent) Assessee By : None Revenue By : Shri Charan Dass, Sr : Shri Charan Dass, Sr Dr Date Of Hearing : 13/10 10/2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 13/10 /10/2023 O R D E R Per Bench

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Charan Dass, Sr
Section 50C

section 50C. In the grounds of appeal, the assessee has agitated that the Assessing Officer without considering the factual information and submission enhanced the long term capital gain returned by the assessee, which is not correct. This fact has not been agitated either before the AO or before the ld CIT(A). In view of above, we consider it deem