Search: capital gains

6 results for “capital gains”+ Section 133(6)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 1478 Addition to Income6 Section 10(38)4 Section 271(1)(c)4 Section 143(2)4 Section 1484 Section 374 Reopening of Assessment4 Condonation of Delay

RASHI AGRAWAL,CUTTACKI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee allowed

ITA 56/CTK/2023[2014-15]Status: HeardITAT Cuttack04 May 2023AY 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri Keshav Dubey, CAFor Respondent: Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr. DR

Section 10(38)

Capital Gain from sale of equity shares has duly considered the judgment of Hon‟ble Delhi High Court in the case of Suman Poddar V/s ITO (supra) and has decided against the revenue confirming the order of the Tribunal stating it to be the last fact finding authority who on the basis of evidence brought on record has rightly came

RIDHI BAGARIA,CUTTACK vs. ITO WARD-1(1), CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee allowed

ITA 76/CTK/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 May 2023AY 2014-15

RASHI AGRAWAL,CUTTACKI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, CUTTACK

RIDHI BAGARIA,CUTTACK vs. ITO WARD-1(1), CUTTACK

RASHI AGRAWAL,CUTTACKI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, CUTTACK

RIDHI BAGARIA,CUTTACK vs. ITO WARD-1(1), CUTTACK

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTAL CIRCLE, SAMBALPUR vs. SMT. INDRANI PATNAIK, ROURKELA

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, SAMBALPUR vs. SMT. INDRANI PATNAIK, ROURKELA

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTAL CIRCLE, SAMBALPUR vs. SMT. INDRANI PATNAIK, ROURKELA

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, SAMBALPUR vs. SMT. INDRANI PATNAIK, ROURKELA