BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “capital gains”+ Rectification u/s 154clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai352Delhi275Bangalore138Chennai120Kolkata98Agra69Ahmedabad67Jaipur56Chandigarh53Pune42Hyderabad32Visakhapatnam30Indore28Surat27Lucknow23Nagpur18Cochin13Rajkot7Amritsar7Allahabad5Jodhpur5Patna5Cuttack4Raipur3Karnataka2Panaji2Varanasi1Himachal Pradesh1Kerala1Jabalpur1Telangana1

Key Topics

Section 26312Section 26012Section 12A10Section 119Section 407Section 1544Charitable Trust4Deduction4Section 11(1)(a)3Exemption

PARADIP PORT AUTHORITY,JAGATSINGHPUR vs. DCIT,CIRCLE-1(1), CUTTACK

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 208/CTK/2024[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack25 Sept 2024AY 2003-04
Section 11Section 11(1)(a)Section 12ASection 260Section 263

rectification for allowing deduction of the amount of 15% of the gross receipts out of total amount of income Le. Rs 76,26,863/-is a mistake apparent from record and, therefore, we direct the AO to allow that deduction of 15% of the gross receipts and charge the tax on the shortfall of Rs. 9,43,500/-only

PARADIP PORT AUTHORITY,JAGATSINGHPUR vs. DCIT,CIRCLE1(1), CUTTACK

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are allowed

3
Limitation/Time-bar3
Revision u/s 2633
ITA 210/CTK/2024[2005-06]Status: Disposed
ITAT Cuttack
25 Sept 2024
AY 2005-06
Section 11Section 11(1)(a)Section 12ASection 260Section 263

rectification for allowing deduction of the amount of 15% of the gross receipts out of total amount of income Le. Rs 76,26,863/-is a mistake apparent from record and, therefore, we direct the AO to allow that deduction of 15% of the gross receipts and charge the tax on the shortfall of Rs. 9,43,500/-only

PARADIP PORT AUTHORITY,JAGATSINGHPUR vs. DCIT,CIRCLE-1(1), CUTTACK

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 209/CTK/2024[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack25 Sept 2024AY 2004-05
Section 11Section 11(1)(a)Section 12ASection 260Section 263

rectification for allowing deduction of the amount of 15% of the gross receipts out of total amount of income Le. Rs 76,26,863/-is a mistake apparent from record and, therefore, we direct the AO to allow that deduction of 15% of the gross receipts and charge the tax on the shortfall of Rs. 9,43,500/-only

REGIONAL COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING & MANAGEMENT,BHUBANESWAR vs. ITO, WARD-2(2), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 94/CTK/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Aug 2020AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.94/Ctk/2016 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2008-2009 Regional College Of Engineering & Vs. Ito Ward-2(2), Bhubaneswar Management, Plot No.18, Sector-A, Zone-B, Mancheswar Industrial Estate, Bhubaneswar-751010 Pan No. : Aaaar 1386 H (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधााररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Sunil Mishra, Advocate राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Subhendu Datta, Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 20/08/2020 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 21/08/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per L.P.Sahu, Am: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Cit(A)-3, Bhubaneswar, Dated 28.12.2015 For The Assessment Year 2008-2009, On The Following Grounds Of Appeal :- 1. That, The Learned Cit (A) Has Committed Serious Error In Not Allowing The Appeal Of The Appellant Against The Order Of The Learned Ao Passed U/S 154 Of The Income Tax Act Dated 15.10.2014 . 2. That, The Learned Cit (A) Has Committed Serious Error In Not Accepting That The Denial Of "Emption To A Charitable Trust Granted Registration U/S 12Aa Of The Income Tax Act Is A Mistake Apparent From Record As Envisaged U/S 154 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961. 3. That, The Learned Cit (A) Has Committed Serious Error In Holding That The Mistake Of Disallowance For Violation Of Provision Of Section 40(A)(Ia) Of The Income Tax Act Is Not A Mistake Apparent From Record In The Case Of A Charitable Trust Registered U/S 12Aa Of The Income Tax Act.

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Mishra, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Subhendu Datta, DR
Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 154Section 28Section 40

154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 3. That, the learned CIT (A) has committed serious error in holding that the mistake of disallowance for violation of provision of Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act is not a mistake apparent from record in the case of a charitable Trust registered u/s 12AA of the Income