NATIONAL ALUMINIUM COMPANY LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR vs. PRINCIPAL CIT-1, BHUBANESWAR
In the result, appeal of the assessee stands allowed
ITA 62/CTK/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack30 Nov 2023AY 2016-17
Bench: Before S/Shri George Mathan, Judicial & Girish Agrawalassessment Year : 2016-17 National National Aluminium Aluminium Vs. Dcit, Circle Dcit, Circle -1(2), Company Limited., Nalco Company Limited., Nalco Bhubaneswar Bhubaneswar Bhawan, Bhawan, Nayapalli, Nayapalli, Bhubaneswar. Bhubaneswar. Pan/Gir No. Pan/Gir No.Aaacn 7449 M (Appellant) ) .. ( Respondent Respondent) Assessee By Assessee By : Shri Ved Jain, Ca & Shri P. Venugopal Rao, Ca Venugopal Rao, Ca Revenue By : Dr.Abani Kanta Nayak, Abani Kanta Nayak, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing : 30/11 11/2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 30/11 /11/2023 O R D E R Per Bench
For Appellant: Shri Ved Jain, CA and Shri P. Venugopal Rao, CAFor Respondent: Dr.Abani Kanta Nayak
Section 142Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 234BSection 263Section 43B
block of asset acquired of Rs. 12,81,03,727/-.
Please explain how the same is admissible under the provisions of the Act.
P a g e 3 | 13
Assessment Year : 2016-17
2. You have claimed deduction u/s 32AC of the Act. In this regard please furnish following details of assets acquired and installed.
I. Type of asset
