Search: bogus purchases

3 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 133(6)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 10(38)4 Addition to Income3 Capital Gains2 Long Term Capital Gains2 Exemption2

SANSAR AGROPOL PRIVATE LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR vs. I.T.O. WARD-2(2), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 120/CTK/2024[2011-12]Status: HeardITAT Cuttack15 Oct 2024AY 2011-12

section 133(6) from all of them vide his letters dated 20.01.2014. It is significant to mention here that confirmations were received from all the 10 parties and examined by the AO. In the first para of page 3 of the Assessment Order (Page-5 of the paper book) the AO has observed as under in this regard. "For further

RASHI AGRAWAL,CUTTACKI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee allowed

ITA 56/CTK/2023[2014-15]Status: HeardITAT Cuttack04 May 2023AY 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri Keshav Dubey, CAFor Respondent: Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr. DR

Section 10(38)

SANSAR AGROPOL PRIVATE LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR vs. I.T.O. WARD-2(2), BHUBANESWAR

RASHI AGRAWAL,CUTTACKI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, CUTTACK

SANSAR AGROPOL PRIVATE LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR vs. I.T.O. WARD-2(2), BHUBANESWAR

RASHI AGRAWAL,CUTTACKI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, CUTTACK

RIDHI BAGARIA,CUTTACK vs. ITO WARD-1(1), CUTTACK