Search: bogus purchases

3 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 133clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 10(38)4 Addition to Income3 Capital Gains2 Long Term Capital Gains2 Exemption2

RASHI AGRAWAL,CUTTACKI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee allowed

ITA 56/CTK/2023[2014-15]Status: HeardITAT Cuttack04 May 2023AY 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri Keshav Dubey, CAFor Respondent: Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr. DR

Section 10(38)

bogus, sham and nothing other than a racket of accommodation entries. We do notice that the AO made an attempt to delve into the question of infusion of Respondent‟s unaccounted money, but he did not dig deeper. Notices issued under Sections 133(6)/131 of the Act were issued to M/s Gold Line International Finvest Limited, but nothing emerged

RIDHI BAGARIA,CUTTACK vs. ITO WARD-1(1), CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee allowed

ITA 76/CTK/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 May 2023

RASHI AGRAWAL,CUTTACKI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, CUTTACK

RIDHI BAGARIA,CUTTACK vs. ITO WARD-1(1), CUTTACK

RASHI AGRAWAL,CUTTACKI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, CUTTACK

RIDHI BAGARIA,CUTTACK vs. ITO WARD-1(1), CUTTACK

SANSAR AGROPOL PRIVATE LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR vs. I.T.O. WARD-2(2), BHUBANESWAR