BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

71 results for “TDS”+ Section 90clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,607Delhi1,529Bangalore665Chennai505Kolkata400Ahmedabad312Cochin309Hyderabad302Indore187Jaipur178Raipur160Chandigarh145Pune125Karnataka123Surat74Cuttack71Visakhapatnam62Nagpur56Lucknow45Rajkot39Guwahati32Ranchi19Dehradun18Amritsar18Allahabad18Kerala17Agra15Telangana13Jodhpur12SC11Varanasi10Patna9Panaji5Punjab & Haryana2Calcutta2Jabalpur2

Key Topics

Section 801A63Addition to Income56Disallowance46Section 4036Section 143(3)32Deduction31TDS19Section 26313Section 194C12Section 194H

DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1), BHUBANESWAR, BHUBANESWAR vs. M/S. PARADEEP PHOSPHATES LIMITED, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed and that of

ITA 289/CTK/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack04 Aug 2017AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri N.S Saini & Pavan Kumar Gadaleassessment Year : 2010-2011

For Appellant: Shri B.K.MohapatraFor Respondent: Shri Kunal Singh, CIT DR
Section 195Section 195(1)Section 195(2)Section 197Section 263Section 40Section 92

sections 4, 5, 9, 90 and 91 as well as the provisions of the DTAA are also relevant, while applying tax deduction at source provisions. Reference to the ITO (TDS

Showing 1–20 of 71 · Page 1 of 4

11
Section 14810
Section 10B10

DCIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE-1(2), BHUBANESWAR vs. NATIONAL ALUMINIUM COMPANY LIMITED, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee and Revenue along

ITA 69/CTK/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack27 Oct 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.338/Ctk/2017 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.39/Ctk/2019 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.01/Ctk/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2009-2010, 2015-2016 & 2016-2017) National Aluminium Company Limited, Vs. Acit, Corporate Circle-1(2), Bhubaneswar Nalco Bhawan, P/1, Nayapalli, Bhubaneswar Pan No. : Aaacn 7449 M & आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.331/Ctk/2017 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.69/Ctk/2019 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.65/Ctk/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2009-2010, 2015-2016 & 2016-2017) National Aluminium Company Limited, Vs. Dcit/Acit, Nalco Bhawan, P/1, Nayapalli, Corporate Circle-1(2), Bhubaneswar Bhubaneswar Pan No. : Aaacn 7449 M & Cross Objection No.11/Ctk/2019 Cross Objection No.02/Ctk/2020 (Arising Out Of Ita Nos.69/Ctk/2019 & 65/Ctk/2020) (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2015-2016 & 2016-2017) National Aluminium Company Limited, Vs. Dcit/Acit, Nalco Bhavan, P/1, Nayapalli, Corporate Circle-1(2), Bhubaneswar Bhubaneswar Pan No. : Aaacn 7449 M (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधााररती की ओर से /Assessee By Shri A.K.Sabat & B.K.Mahapatra, Cas : राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By Shri M.K.Gautam, Cit Dr : सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 06/10/2020 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 28/10/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : These Are The Cross Appeals Filed By The Assessee & Revenue & Cross Objections By The Assessee, Against The Separate Orders Of The Cit(A)-1, Bhubaneswar, Dated 30.12.2017, 27.12.2018 & 24.10.2019

TDS and cooperate with the AO for early disposal of the case. Needless to say, the assessee shall be provided a reasonable opportunity of being heard. Thus, ground No.4 is allowed for statistical purposes. Ground No.5 : Disallowance of provision for Leave Encashment u/s.43B(f) of the Act at Rs.43,44,18,199/- 22. During the course of assessment proceedings

NATIONAL ALUMINIUM COMPANY LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE-1(2), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee and Revenue along

ITA 338/CTK/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack27 Oct 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.338/Ctk/2017 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.39/Ctk/2019 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.01/Ctk/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2009-2010, 2015-2016 & 2016-2017) National Aluminium Company Limited, Vs. Acit, Corporate Circle-1(2), Bhubaneswar Nalco Bhawan, P/1, Nayapalli, Bhubaneswar Pan No. : Aaacn 7449 M & आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.331/Ctk/2017 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.69/Ctk/2019 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.65/Ctk/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2009-2010, 2015-2016 & 2016-2017) National Aluminium Company Limited, Vs. Dcit/Acit, Nalco Bhawan, P/1, Nayapalli, Corporate Circle-1(2), Bhubaneswar Bhubaneswar Pan No. : Aaacn 7449 M & Cross Objection No.11/Ctk/2019 Cross Objection No.02/Ctk/2020 (Arising Out Of Ita Nos.69/Ctk/2019 & 65/Ctk/2020) (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2015-2016 & 2016-2017) National Aluminium Company Limited, Vs. Dcit/Acit, Nalco Bhavan, P/1, Nayapalli, Corporate Circle-1(2), Bhubaneswar Bhubaneswar Pan No. : Aaacn 7449 M (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधााररती की ओर से /Assessee By Shri A.K.Sabat & B.K.Mahapatra, Cas : राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By Shri M.K.Gautam, Cit Dr : सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 06/10/2020 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 28/10/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : These Are The Cross Appeals Filed By The Assessee & Revenue & Cross Objections By The Assessee, Against The Separate Orders Of The Cit(A)-1, Bhubaneswar, Dated 30.12.2017, 27.12.2018 & 24.10.2019

TDS and cooperate with the AO for early disposal of the case. Needless to say, the assessee shall be provided a reasonable opportunity of being heard. Thus, ground No.4 is allowed for statistical purposes. Ground No.5 : Disallowance of provision for Leave Encashment u/s.43B(f) of the Act at Rs.43,44,18,199/- 22. During the course of assessment proceedings

ACIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE-1(2), BHUBANESWAR vs. NATIONAL ALUMINIUM COMPANY LTD., BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee and Revenue along

ITA 331/CTK/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack27 Oct 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.338/Ctk/2017 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.39/Ctk/2019 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.01/Ctk/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2009-2010, 2015-2016 & 2016-2017) National Aluminium Company Limited, Vs. Acit, Corporate Circle-1(2), Bhubaneswar Nalco Bhawan, P/1, Nayapalli, Bhubaneswar Pan No. : Aaacn 7449 M & आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.331/Ctk/2017 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.69/Ctk/2019 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.65/Ctk/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2009-2010, 2015-2016 & 2016-2017) National Aluminium Company Limited, Vs. Dcit/Acit, Nalco Bhawan, P/1, Nayapalli, Corporate Circle-1(2), Bhubaneswar Bhubaneswar Pan No. : Aaacn 7449 M & Cross Objection No.11/Ctk/2019 Cross Objection No.02/Ctk/2020 (Arising Out Of Ita Nos.69/Ctk/2019 & 65/Ctk/2020) (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2015-2016 & 2016-2017) National Aluminium Company Limited, Vs. Dcit/Acit, Nalco Bhavan, P/1, Nayapalli, Corporate Circle-1(2), Bhubaneswar Bhubaneswar Pan No. : Aaacn 7449 M (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधााररती की ओर से /Assessee By Shri A.K.Sabat & B.K.Mahapatra, Cas : राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By Shri M.K.Gautam, Cit Dr : सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 06/10/2020 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 28/10/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : These Are The Cross Appeals Filed By The Assessee & Revenue & Cross Objections By The Assessee, Against The Separate Orders Of The Cit(A)-1, Bhubaneswar, Dated 30.12.2017, 27.12.2018 & 24.10.2019

TDS and cooperate with the AO for early disposal of the case. Needless to say, the assessee shall be provided a reasonable opportunity of being heard. Thus, ground No.4 is allowed for statistical purposes. Ground No.5 : Disallowance of provision for Leave Encashment u/s.43B(f) of the Act at Rs.43,44,18,199/- 22. During the course of assessment proceedings

DCIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE- 1(2), BHUBANESWAR vs. M/S. NATIONAL ALUMINIUM COMPANY LTD., BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee and Revenue along

ITA 65/CTK/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack27 Oct 2020AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.338/Ctk/2017 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.39/Ctk/2019 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.01/Ctk/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2009-2010, 2015-2016 & 2016-2017) National Aluminium Company Limited, Vs. Acit, Corporate Circle-1(2), Bhubaneswar Nalco Bhawan, P/1, Nayapalli, Bhubaneswar Pan No. : Aaacn 7449 M & आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.331/Ctk/2017 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.69/Ctk/2019 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.65/Ctk/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2009-2010, 2015-2016 & 2016-2017) National Aluminium Company Limited, Vs. Dcit/Acit, Nalco Bhawan, P/1, Nayapalli, Corporate Circle-1(2), Bhubaneswar Bhubaneswar Pan No. : Aaacn 7449 M & Cross Objection No.11/Ctk/2019 Cross Objection No.02/Ctk/2020 (Arising Out Of Ita Nos.69/Ctk/2019 & 65/Ctk/2020) (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2015-2016 & 2016-2017) National Aluminium Company Limited, Vs. Dcit/Acit, Nalco Bhavan, P/1, Nayapalli, Corporate Circle-1(2), Bhubaneswar Bhubaneswar Pan No. : Aaacn 7449 M (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधााररती की ओर से /Assessee By Shri A.K.Sabat & B.K.Mahapatra, Cas : राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By Shri M.K.Gautam, Cit Dr : सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 06/10/2020 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 28/10/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : These Are The Cross Appeals Filed By The Assessee & Revenue & Cross Objections By The Assessee, Against The Separate Orders Of The Cit(A)-1, Bhubaneswar, Dated 30.12.2017, 27.12.2018 & 24.10.2019

TDS and cooperate with the AO for early disposal of the case. Needless to say, the assessee shall be provided a reasonable opportunity of being heard. Thus, ground No.4 is allowed for statistical purposes. Ground No.5 : Disallowance of provision for Leave Encashment u/s.43B(f) of the Act at Rs.43,44,18,199/- 22. During the course of assessment proceedings

NATIONAL ALUMINIUM COMPANY LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE- 1(2), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee and Revenue along

ITA 1/CTK/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack27 Oct 2020AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.338/Ctk/2017 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.39/Ctk/2019 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.01/Ctk/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2009-2010, 2015-2016 & 2016-2017) National Aluminium Company Limited, Vs. Acit, Corporate Circle-1(2), Bhubaneswar Nalco Bhawan, P/1, Nayapalli, Bhubaneswar Pan No. : Aaacn 7449 M & आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.331/Ctk/2017 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.69/Ctk/2019 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.65/Ctk/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2009-2010, 2015-2016 & 2016-2017) National Aluminium Company Limited, Vs. Dcit/Acit, Nalco Bhawan, P/1, Nayapalli, Corporate Circle-1(2), Bhubaneswar Bhubaneswar Pan No. : Aaacn 7449 M & Cross Objection No.11/Ctk/2019 Cross Objection No.02/Ctk/2020 (Arising Out Of Ita Nos.69/Ctk/2019 & 65/Ctk/2020) (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2015-2016 & 2016-2017) National Aluminium Company Limited, Vs. Dcit/Acit, Nalco Bhavan, P/1, Nayapalli, Corporate Circle-1(2), Bhubaneswar Bhubaneswar Pan No. : Aaacn 7449 M (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधााररती की ओर से /Assessee By Shri A.K.Sabat & B.K.Mahapatra, Cas : राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By Shri M.K.Gautam, Cit Dr : सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 06/10/2020 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 28/10/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : These Are The Cross Appeals Filed By The Assessee & Revenue & Cross Objections By The Assessee, Against The Separate Orders Of The Cit(A)-1, Bhubaneswar, Dated 30.12.2017, 27.12.2018 & 24.10.2019

TDS and cooperate with the AO for early disposal of the case. Needless to say, the assessee shall be provided a reasonable opportunity of being heard. Thus, ground No.4 is allowed for statistical purposes. Ground No.5 : Disallowance of provision for Leave Encashment u/s.43B(f) of the Act at Rs.43,44,18,199/- 22. During the course of assessment proceedings

NATIONAL ALUMINIUM COMPANY LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE-1(2), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee and Revenue along

ITA 39/CTK/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack27 Oct 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.338/Ctk/2017 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.39/Ctk/2019 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.01/Ctk/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2009-2010, 2015-2016 & 2016-2017) National Aluminium Company Limited, Vs. Acit, Corporate Circle-1(2), Bhubaneswar Nalco Bhawan, P/1, Nayapalli, Bhubaneswar Pan No. : Aaacn 7449 M & आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.331/Ctk/2017 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.69/Ctk/2019 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.65/Ctk/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2009-2010, 2015-2016 & 2016-2017) National Aluminium Company Limited, Vs. Dcit/Acit, Nalco Bhawan, P/1, Nayapalli, Corporate Circle-1(2), Bhubaneswar Bhubaneswar Pan No. : Aaacn 7449 M & Cross Objection No.11/Ctk/2019 Cross Objection No.02/Ctk/2020 (Arising Out Of Ita Nos.69/Ctk/2019 & 65/Ctk/2020) (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2015-2016 & 2016-2017) National Aluminium Company Limited, Vs. Dcit/Acit, Nalco Bhavan, P/1, Nayapalli, Corporate Circle-1(2), Bhubaneswar Bhubaneswar Pan No. : Aaacn 7449 M (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधााररती की ओर से /Assessee By Shri A.K.Sabat & B.K.Mahapatra, Cas : राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By Shri M.K.Gautam, Cit Dr : सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 06/10/2020 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 28/10/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : These Are The Cross Appeals Filed By The Assessee & Revenue & Cross Objections By The Assessee, Against The Separate Orders Of The Cit(A)-1, Bhubaneswar, Dated 30.12.2017, 27.12.2018 & 24.10.2019

TDS and cooperate with the AO for early disposal of the case. Needless to say, the assessee shall be provided a reasonable opportunity of being heard. Thus, ground No.4 is allowed for statistical purposes. Ground No.5 : Disallowance of provision for Leave Encashment u/s.43B(f) of the Act at Rs.43,44,18,199/- 22. During the course of assessment proceedings

VODAFONE IDEA LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT, TDS, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all four appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 306/CTK/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack05 Jun 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Salil Kapoor, Ms Soumya Singh & Nirod PatadeFor Respondent: Shri M.K.Gautam, CIT DR
Section 194HSection 194JSection 201(1)Section 201(3)

TDS) Jaipur vs M/s. Idea Cellular Ltd in ITA No.205 of 2005, wherein, it has been held that the assessee is not in default under section 201(1) of the Act for non-deduction of tax u/s.194H of the Act in respect of discount allowed on prepaid SIM cards, has answered in favour of the assessee. 22. In view

M/S. BALASORE CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD.,BALASORE vs. ACIT, BALASORE CIRCLE, BALASORE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 467/CTK/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack07 Oct 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.467/Ctk/2017 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2012-2013) M/S Balasore Cooperative Bank Vs. Acit, Balasore Circle, Limited, Balasore Bibekananda Marg, Balasore-756001 Pan No. : Aaccb 7823 M (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधााररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri S.N.Sahu/Somnath Sahoo,Advs राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri M.K.Gautam, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 13/08/2020 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 12/10/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per L.P.Sahu, Am: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Passed By The Cit(A), Cuttack, Dated 04.08.2017, For The Assessment Year 2012-2013, On The Following Grounds Of Appeal :- 1) That The Order Of The Id. Cit(Appeals) Confirming The Additions & Disallowances Made By The A.O. Is Illegal, Arbitrary, Unjustified & Not In Accordance With Law. 2) That The Addition Of Rs. 36,79,148/- U/S. 40(A)(Ia) Of The I.T. Act, 1961 Confirmed By Cit(Appeals) To The Extent Of Rs. 36,30,998/- Is Illegal, Arbitrary, Uncalled For & Not In Accordance With Law & The Same Should Have Been Deleted By The Learned Cit(Appeals). 3) That The Disallowance U/S 40(A)(Ia) Of Rs. 36,79,148/- As Detailed Below Is Illegal, Arbitrary & Unjustified & Hence Should Have Been Deleted By The Learned Cit(A) As The Genuineness Is Not In Doubt. Non-Deduction Of Tds Is A Separate Issue. A) Commission Payment To Dlds Collection Agents Rs. 33,45,248/- B) Legal Expenses Rs. 2,52,000/- C) Audit Fees Rs. 81,900/-

For Appellant: Shri S.N.Sahu/Somnath Sahoo,AdvsFor Respondent: Shri M.K.Gautam, CIT-DR
Section 36Section 40Section 43B

Sections 40(a)(ia) and 40A(3)17 of the Act, that the said provisions are intended to enforce due compliance of the requirement of other provisions of the Act and to ensure proper collection of tax as also transparency in dealings of the parties. The necessity of disallowance comes into operation only when default of the nature specified

DCIT, BHUBANESWAR vs. NEELACHAL ISPAT NIGAM LTD., BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals filed by the revenue in ITA Nos

ITA 299/CTK/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack30 Jun 2017AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri N.S.Saini, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita Nos.382, 298, 435, 299, 436 & 448/Ctk/2015 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2006-07, 2007-08,2008-09, 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13) Dcit, Corporate Circle- Vs. Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. & Cross Objection Nos.48, 37, 53, 38 & 54/Ctk/2015 (Arising Out Of Ita Nos.382, 298,435,299,& 436/Ctk/2015) (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2006-07, 2007-08,2008-09, 2010-11, 2011-12) Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., Vs. Acit, Corporate Circle- 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. & आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.09/Ctk/2016 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2012-2013) Acit, Corporate Circle- Vs. Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Kunal Singh, Dr ननधााररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Satyajit Mishra, Ar

For Appellant: Shri Satyajit Mishra, ARFor Respondent: Shri Kunal Singh, DR
Section 143(3)Section 148Section 194HSection 260ASection 263Section 40

Section 143(3)/147, dated 31.7.2013. 5. Aggrieved by the order of AO, the assessee preferred appeal before the CIT(A). In the appellate proceedings ld. CIT(A) on the disputed issue of payment of commission at 3% to MMTC Ltd. found that similar issue was decided by the ITAT in assessee’s own case in ITA Nos.295 to 298/CTK/2013

DCIT, BHUBANESWAR vs. NEELACHAL ISPAT NIGAM LTD., BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals filed by the revenue in ITA Nos

ITA 298/CTK/2015[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack30 Jun 2017AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri N.S.Saini, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita Nos.382, 298, 435, 299, 436 & 448/Ctk/2015 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2006-07, 2007-08,2008-09, 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13) Dcit, Corporate Circle- Vs. Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. & Cross Objection Nos.48, 37, 53, 38 & 54/Ctk/2015 (Arising Out Of Ita Nos.382, 298,435,299,& 436/Ctk/2015) (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2006-07, 2007-08,2008-09, 2010-11, 2011-12) Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., Vs. Acit, Corporate Circle- 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. & आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.09/Ctk/2016 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2012-2013) Acit, Corporate Circle- Vs. Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Kunal Singh, Dr ननधााररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Satyajit Mishra, Ar

For Appellant: Shri Satyajit Mishra, ARFor Respondent: Shri Kunal Singh, DR
Section 143(3)Section 148Section 194HSection 260ASection 263Section 40

Section 143(3)/147, dated 31.7.2013. 5. Aggrieved by the order of AO, the assessee preferred appeal before the CIT(A). In the appellate proceedings ld. CIT(A) on the disputed issue of payment of commission at 3% to MMTC Ltd. found that similar issue was decided by the ITAT in assessee’s own case in ITA Nos.295 to 298/CTK/2013

DCIT, BHUBANESWAR vs. M/S. NEELACHAL ISPAT NIGAM LIMITED, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals filed by the revenue in ITA Nos

ITA 435/CTK/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack22 Jun 2017AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri N.S.Saini, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita Nos.382, 298, 435, 299, 436 & 448/Ctk/2015 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2006-07, 2007-08,2008-09, 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13) Dcit, Corporate Circle- Vs. Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. & Cross Objection Nos.48, 37, 53, 38 & 54/Ctk/2015 (Arising Out Of Ita Nos.382, 298,435,299,& 436/Ctk/2015) (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2006-07, 2007-08,2008-09, 2010-11, 2011-12) Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., Vs. Acit, Corporate Circle- 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. & आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.09/Ctk/2016 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2012-2013) Acit, Corporate Circle- Vs. Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Kunal Singh, Dr ननधााररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Satyajit Mishra, Ar

For Appellant: Shri Satyajit Mishra, ARFor Respondent: Shri Kunal Singh, DR
Section 143(3)Section 148Section 194HSection 260ASection 263Section 40

Section 143(3)/147, dated 31.7.2013. 5. Aggrieved by the order of AO, the assessee preferred appeal before the CIT(A). In the appellate proceedings ld. CIT(A) on the disputed issue of payment of commission at 3% to MMTC Ltd. found that similar issue was decided by the ITAT in assessee’s own case in ITA Nos.295 to 298/CTK/2013

ACIT, BHUBANESWAR vs. M/S. NEELACHAL ISPAT NIGAM LTD., BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals filed by the revenue in ITA Nos

ITA 382/CTK/2015[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack22 Jun 2017AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri N.S.Saini, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita Nos.382, 298, 435, 299, 436 & 448/Ctk/2015 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2006-07, 2007-08,2008-09, 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13) Dcit, Corporate Circle- Vs. Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. & Cross Objection Nos.48, 37, 53, 38 & 54/Ctk/2015 (Arising Out Of Ita Nos.382, 298,435,299,& 436/Ctk/2015) (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2006-07, 2007-08,2008-09, 2010-11, 2011-12) Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., Vs. Acit, Corporate Circle- 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. & आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.09/Ctk/2016 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2012-2013) Acit, Corporate Circle- Vs. Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Kunal Singh, Dr ननधााररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Satyajit Mishra, Ar

For Appellant: Shri Satyajit Mishra, ARFor Respondent: Shri Kunal Singh, DR
Section 143(3)Section 148Section 194HSection 260ASection 263Section 40

Section 143(3)/147, dated 31.7.2013. 5. Aggrieved by the order of AO, the assessee preferred appeal before the CIT(A). In the appellate proceedings ld. CIT(A) on the disputed issue of payment of commission at 3% to MMTC Ltd. found that similar issue was decided by the ITAT in assessee’s own case in ITA Nos.295 to 298/CTK/2013

DCIT, BHUBANESWAR vs. M/S. NEELACHAL ISPAT NIGAM LIMITED, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals filed by the revenue in ITA Nos

ITA 436/CTK/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack22 Jun 2017AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri N.S.Saini, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita Nos.382, 298, 435, 299, 436 & 448/Ctk/2015 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2006-07, 2007-08,2008-09, 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13) Dcit, Corporate Circle- Vs. Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. & Cross Objection Nos.48, 37, 53, 38 & 54/Ctk/2015 (Arising Out Of Ita Nos.382, 298,435,299,& 436/Ctk/2015) (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2006-07, 2007-08,2008-09, 2010-11, 2011-12) Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., Vs. Acit, Corporate Circle- 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. & आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.09/Ctk/2016 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2012-2013) Acit, Corporate Circle- Vs. Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Kunal Singh, Dr ननधााररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Satyajit Mishra, Ar

For Appellant: Shri Satyajit Mishra, ARFor Respondent: Shri Kunal Singh, DR
Section 143(3)Section 148Section 194HSection 260ASection 263Section 40

Section 143(3)/147, dated 31.7.2013. 5. Aggrieved by the order of AO, the assessee preferred appeal before the CIT(A). In the appellate proceedings ld. CIT(A) on the disputed issue of payment of commission at 3% to MMTC Ltd. found that similar issue was decided by the ITAT in assessee’s own case in ITA Nos.295 to 298/CTK/2013

ACIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE-1(2), BHUBANESWAR vs. M/S. NEELACHAL ISPAT NIGAM LIMITED, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals filed by the revenue in ITA Nos

ITA 9/CTK/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack22 Jun 2017AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri N.S.Saini, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita Nos.382, 298, 435, 299, 436 & 448/Ctk/2015 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2006-07, 2007-08,2008-09, 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13) Dcit, Corporate Circle- Vs. Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. & Cross Objection Nos.48, 37, 53, 38 & 54/Ctk/2015 (Arising Out Of Ita Nos.382, 298,435,299,& 436/Ctk/2015) (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2006-07, 2007-08,2008-09, 2010-11, 2011-12) Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., Vs. Acit, Corporate Circle- 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. & आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.09/Ctk/2016 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2012-2013) Acit, Corporate Circle- Vs. Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Kunal Singh, Dr ननधााररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Satyajit Mishra, Ar

For Appellant: Shri Satyajit Mishra, ARFor Respondent: Shri Kunal Singh, DR
Section 143(3)Section 148Section 194HSection 260ASection 263Section 40

Section 143(3)/147, dated 31.7.2013. 5. Aggrieved by the order of AO, the assessee preferred appeal before the CIT(A). In the appellate proceedings ld. CIT(A) on the disputed issue of payment of commission at 3% to MMTC Ltd. found that similar issue was decided by the ITAT in assessee’s own case in ITA Nos.295 to 298/CTK/2013

ACIT(TDS), BHUBANESWAR vs. NEELACHAL ISPAT NIGAM LIMITED, JAJPUR

In the result, appeals filed by the revenue in ITA Nos

ITA 448/CTK/2015[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack22 Jun 2017AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri N.S.Saini, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita Nos.382, 298, 435, 299, 436 & 448/Ctk/2015 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2006-07, 2007-08,2008-09, 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13) Dcit, Corporate Circle- Vs. Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. & Cross Objection Nos.48, 37, 53, 38 & 54/Ctk/2015 (Arising Out Of Ita Nos.382, 298,435,299,& 436/Ctk/2015) (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2006-07, 2007-08,2008-09, 2010-11, 2011-12) Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., Vs. Acit, Corporate Circle- 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. & आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.09/Ctk/2016 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2012-2013) Acit, Corporate Circle- Vs. Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Kunal Singh, Dr ननधााररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Satyajit Mishra, Ar

For Appellant: Shri Satyajit Mishra, ARFor Respondent: Shri Kunal Singh, DR
Section 143(3)Section 148Section 194HSection 260ASection 263Section 40

Section 143(3)/147, dated 31.7.2013. 5. Aggrieved by the order of AO, the assessee preferred appeal before the CIT(A). In the appellate proceedings ld. CIT(A) on the disputed issue of payment of commission at 3% to MMTC Ltd. found that similar issue was decided by the ITAT in assessee’s own case in ITA Nos.295 to 298/CTK/2013

SK. GOLAM MUSTAFA,JAJPUR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1(1), CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 132/CTK/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack31 Aug 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri N.S.Saini, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.132/Ctk/2018 Assessment Year: 2012-2013 Sk.Golam Mustafa Vs. Acit, Circle-1(1), Cuttack New Siaria, Trijanga, Rehabilitation Colony, Danagadi, Jajpur-755026 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Akgpm 6161 L (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) .. "नधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee By : Shri P.K.Sahoo, Ar राज"व क" ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Subhendu Dutta, Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 30/08/2018 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement 31/08/2018 आदेश / O R D E R Per Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Cit(A), Cuttack, Dated 27.02.2018 Passed In I.T.Appeal No.0005/2015-16 For The Assessment Year 2012-2013. 2. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal :- 1. The Order Of Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals) Cuttack Confirming The Addition Of Rs 2,35,127/- Made By The Acit,Circle-L(L) Cuttack Under Section 40A(3) Of It Act 1961 In Computing The Business Income Of The Assessee Is Arbitrary To Law & The Facts Of The Case. 2. The Learned Commissioner Of Incometax (Appeats),Cuttack Is Not Justified In Disallowing The Professional Fees Paid Amounting To Rs 6,68,680/- On The Ground That No Tds Has Been Deducted From Such Payments. 3. The Appellant Craves Leave To Add Or Amend Any Grounds Of Appeal. 3. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Is Engaged In The Business Of Contract Work Under The Name & Style Of Royal Enterprises

For Appellant: Shri P.K.Sahoo, ARFor Respondent: Shri Subhendu Dutta, DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 194JSection 40Section 40A(3)

TDS has not been deduced in respect of professional fees u/s.194J, therefore, ld.DR prayed for dismissal of the appeal. 8. We have heard rival submissions and perused the material on record. On the first disputed issue of disallowance u/s.40A(3), ld. AR submitted that the provision of Section 40A(3) of the Act does not apply in the present case

SUBHALAXMI AGENCIES PVT. LTD.,NAYAGARH vs. JCIT, RAMGE-2, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeal of the revenue is partly allowed and that of

ITA 132/CTK/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack21 Nov 2017AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri N.S Saini & Pavan Kumar Gadale

For Appellant: Shri S.K.Agarwal, ARFor Respondent: Shri D.K.Pradhan, DR
Section 194ASection 194CSection 194JSection 40

section 194C(5) of the Act, which provides that in such cases no TDS was to be deducted from the payments made for transportation of goods and, therefore, no disallowance can be made u/s.40(a)(ia) of the Act for non-deduction of TDS from such payments. We find that the assessee before the CIT(A) relied on the decision

BRIG.NARAYAN NAYAK,BHUBANESWAR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-5(1), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, ITA No.30/CTK/2017 is partly allowed for

ITA 30/CTK/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack05 Jun 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.30/Ctk/2017 & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.230/Ctk/2019 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2012-2013) Brig. Narayan Nayak, Vs. Dcit, Circle-5(1), Prop: M/S Industrial Security & Bhubaneswar Allied Services, F3-F5, Id Market, Irc Village, Nayapalli, Bhubanesar-751015 स्थायी लेखा सं./Pan No. : Abapn 3373 Q (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधाारिती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri P.K.Sahoo, Ca िाजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Subhendu Dutta, Dr सुनवाई की तािीख / Date Of Hearing : 25/02/2020 घोषणा की तािीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 05/06/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per L.P.Sahu, Am: The Assessee Has Filed The Above Two Appeals, One Is Against The Order Passed By The Cit(A)-2, Dated 27.10.2016 Arising Out Of The Order Passed By The Ao U/S.143(3) Of The Act & Another Is Against The Order Passed By The Cit(A)-2, Bhubaneswar, Dated 14.04.2019 Arising Out Of The Order Passed By The Ao U/S.271(1)(C) Of The Act. 2. First We Shall Take Up The Appeal Of The Assessee In Ita No.30/Ctk/2017, Wherein The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds :-

For Appellant: Shri P.K.Sahoo, CAFor Respondent: Shri Subhendu Dutta, DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)Section 40Section 43BSection 44A

section 43B will be available only prospectively does not appear to be correct. As observed by G.P. Singh in his Principles of Statutory Interpretation, Fourth edn., page 291, "It is well-settled that if a statute is curative or merely declaratory of the previous law retrospective operation is generally intended". In fact the amendment would not serve its object

BRIG. NARAYAN NAYAK,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT-5(1), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, ITA No.30/CTK/2017 is partly allowed for

ITA 230/CTK/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack05 Jun 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.30/Ctk/2017 & आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.230/Ctk/2019 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2012-2013) Brig. Narayan Nayak, Vs. Dcit, Circle-5(1), Prop: M/S Industrial Security & Bhubaneswar Allied Services, F3-F5, Id Market, Irc Village, Nayapalli, Bhubanesar-751015 स्थायी लेखा सं./Pan No. : Abapn 3373 Q (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधाारिती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri P.K.Sahoo, Ca िाजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Subhendu Dutta, Dr सुनवाई की तािीख / Date Of Hearing : 25/02/2020 घोषणा की तािीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 05/06/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per L.P.Sahu, Am: The Assessee Has Filed The Above Two Appeals, One Is Against The Order Passed By The Cit(A)-2, Dated 27.10.2016 Arising Out Of The Order Passed By The Ao U/S.143(3) Of The Act & Another Is Against The Order Passed By The Cit(A)-2, Bhubaneswar, Dated 14.04.2019 Arising Out Of The Order Passed By The Ao U/S.271(1)(C) Of The Act. 2. First We Shall Take Up The Appeal Of The Assessee In Ita No.30/Ctk/2017, Wherein The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds :-

For Appellant: Shri P.K.Sahoo, CAFor Respondent: Shri Subhendu Dutta, DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)Section 40Section 43BSection 44A

section 43B will be available only prospectively does not appear to be correct. As observed by G.P. Singh in his Principles of Statutory Interpretation, Fourth edn., page 291, "It is well-settled that if a statute is curative or merely declaratory of the previous law retrospective operation is generally intended". In fact the amendment would not serve its object