DCIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE- 1(2), BHUBANESWAR vs. M/S. NATIONAL ALUMINIUM COMPANY LTD., BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee and Revenue along

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.338/Ctk/2017 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.39/Ctk/2019 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.01/Ctk/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2009-2010, 2015-2016 & 2016-2017) National Aluminium Company Limited, Vs. Acit, Corporate Circle-1(2), Bhubaneswar Nalco Bhawan, P/1, Nayapalli, Bhubaneswar Pan No. : Aaacn 7449 M & आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.331/Ctk/2017 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.69/Ctk/2019 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.65/Ctk/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2009-2010, 2015-2016 & 2016-2017) National Aluminium Company Limited, Vs. Dcit/Acit, Nalco Bhawan, P/1, Nayapalli, Corporate Circle-1(2), Bhubaneswar Bhubaneswar Pan No. : Aaacn 7449 M & Cross Objection No.11/Ctk/2019 Cross Objection No.02/Ctk/2020 (Arising Out Of Ita Nos.69/Ctk/2019 & 65/Ctk/2020) (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2015-2016 & 2016-2017) National Aluminium Company Limited, Vs. Dcit/Acit, Nalco Bhavan, P/1, Nayapalli, Corporate Circle-1(2), Bhubaneswar Bhubaneswar Pan No. : Aaacn 7449 M (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधााररती की ओर से /Assessee By Shri A.K.Sabat & B.K.Mahapatra, Cas : राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By Shri M.K.Gautam, Cit Dr : सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 06/10/2020 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 28/10/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : These Are The Cross Appeals Filed By The Assessee & Revenue & Cross Objections By The Assessee, Against The Separate Orders Of The Cit(A)-1, Bhubaneswar, Dated 30.12.2017, 27.12.2018 & 24.10.2019

section 9 r.w.s. 1(i) and 1(ii) of the ITAct. As per the AO, the assessee submitted explanation that TDS has been deducted on the foreign payments of Rs.21,79,89

ACIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE-1(2), BHUBANESWAR vs. NATIONAL ALUMINIUM COMPANY LTD., BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee and Revenue along

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.338/Ctk/2017 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.39/Ctk/2019 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.01/Ctk/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2009-2010, 2015-2016 & 2016-2017) National Aluminium Company Limited, Vs. Acit, Corporate Circle-1(2), Bhubaneswar Nalco Bhawan, P/1, Nayapalli, Bhubaneswar Pan No. : Aaacn 7449 M & आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.331/Ctk/2017 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.69/Ctk/2019 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.65/Ctk/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2009-2010, 2015-2016 & 2016-2017) National Aluminium Company Limited, Vs. Dcit/Acit, Nalco Bhawan, P/1, Nayapalli, Corporate Circle-1(2), Bhubaneswar Bhubaneswar Pan No. : Aaacn 7449 M & Cross Objection No.11/Ctk/2019 Cross Objection No.02/Ctk/2020 (Arising Out Of Ita Nos.69/Ctk/2019 & 65/Ctk/2020) (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2015-2016 & 2016-2017) National Aluminium Company Limited, Vs. Dcit/Acit, Nalco Bhavan, P/1, Nayapalli, Corporate Circle-1(2), Bhubaneswar Bhubaneswar Pan No. : Aaacn 7449 M (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधााररती की ओर से /Assessee By Shri A.K.Sabat & B.K.Mahapatra, Cas : राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By Shri M.K.Gautam, Cit Dr : सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 06/10/2020 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 28/10/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : These Are The Cross Appeals Filed By The Assessee & Revenue & Cross Objections By The Assessee, Against The Separate Orders Of The Cit(A)-1, Bhubaneswar, Dated 30.12.2017, 27.12.2018 & 24.10.2019

section 9 r.w.s. 1(i) and 1(ii) of the ITAct. As per the AO, the assessee submitted explanation that TDS has been deducted on the foreign payments of Rs.21,79,89

NATIONAL ALUMINIUM COMPANY LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE-1(2), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee and Revenue along

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.338/Ctk/2017 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.39/Ctk/2019 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.01/Ctk/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2009-2010, 2015-2016 & 2016-2017) National Aluminium Company Limited, Vs. Acit, Corporate Circle-1(2), Bhubaneswar Nalco Bhawan, P/1, Nayapalli, Bhubaneswar Pan No. : Aaacn 7449 M & आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.331/Ctk/2017 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.69/Ctk/2019 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.65/Ctk/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2009-2010, 2015-2016 & 2016-2017) National Aluminium Company Limited, Vs. Dcit/Acit, Nalco Bhawan, P/1, Nayapalli, Corporate Circle-1(2), Bhubaneswar Bhubaneswar Pan No. : Aaacn 7449 M & Cross Objection No.11/Ctk/2019 Cross Objection No.02/Ctk/2020 (Arising Out Of Ita Nos.69/Ctk/2019 & 65/Ctk/2020) (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2015-2016 & 2016-2017) National Aluminium Company Limited, Vs. Dcit/Acit, Nalco Bhavan, P/1, Nayapalli, Corporate Circle-1(2), Bhubaneswar Bhubaneswar Pan No. : Aaacn 7449 M (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधााररती की ओर से /Assessee By Shri A.K.Sabat & B.K.Mahapatra, Cas : राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By Shri M.K.Gautam, Cit Dr : सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 06/10/2020 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 28/10/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : These Are The Cross Appeals Filed By The Assessee & Revenue & Cross Objections By The Assessee, Against The Separate Orders Of The Cit(A)-1, Bhubaneswar, Dated 30.12.2017, 27.12.2018 & 24.10.2019

section 9 r.w.s. 1(i) and 1(ii) of the ITAct. As per the AO, the assessee submitted explanation that TDS has been deducted on the foreign payments of Rs.21,79,89

NATIONAL ALUMINIUM COMPANY LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE-1(2), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee and Revenue along

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.338/Ctk/2017 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.39/Ctk/2019 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.01/Ctk/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2009-2010, 2015-2016 & 2016-2017) National Aluminium Company Limited, Vs. Acit, Corporate Circle-1(2), Bhubaneswar Nalco Bhawan, P/1, Nayapalli, Bhubaneswar Pan No. : Aaacn 7449 M & आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.331/Ctk/2017 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.69/Ctk/2019 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.65/Ctk/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2009-2010, 2015-2016 & 2016-2017) National Aluminium Company Limited, Vs. Dcit/Acit, Nalco Bhawan, P/1, Nayapalli, Corporate Circle-1(2), Bhubaneswar Bhubaneswar Pan No. : Aaacn 7449 M & Cross Objection No.11/Ctk/2019 Cross Objection No.02/Ctk/2020 (Arising Out Of Ita Nos.69/Ctk/2019 & 65/Ctk/2020) (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2015-2016 & 2016-2017) National Aluminium Company Limited, Vs. Dcit/Acit, Nalco Bhavan, P/1, Nayapalli, Corporate Circle-1(2), Bhubaneswar Bhubaneswar Pan No. : Aaacn 7449 M (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधााररती की ओर से /Assessee By Shri A.K.Sabat & B.K.Mahapatra, Cas : राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By Shri M.K.Gautam, Cit Dr : सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 06/10/2020 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 28/10/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : These Are The Cross Appeals Filed By The Assessee & Revenue & Cross Objections By The Assessee, Against The Separate Orders Of The Cit(A)-1, Bhubaneswar, Dated 30.12.2017, 27.12.2018 & 24.10.2019

section 9 r.w.s. 1(i) and 1(ii) of the ITAct. As per the AO, the assessee submitted explanation that TDS has been deducted on the foreign payments of Rs.21,79,89

M/S. B.K. JENA & ASSOCIATES,KUJANG vs. PR. CIT, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee stands partly allowed

Bench: Before S/Shri George Mathan, Judicial & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpiaassessment Year : 2014-15 M/S. B.K.Jena & Associates, M/S. B.K.Jena & Associates, Vs. Pr. Cit, Cuttack Pr. Cit, Cuttack Rangiagarh, Rangiagarh, Jhimani, Jhimani, Kujang, Kujang, Jagatsinghpur Jagatsinghpur Pan/Gir No. No.Aagfb 4157 P (Appellant (Appellant) .. ( Respondent Respondent) Assessee By : Shri P.R.Mohanty P.R.Mohanty, Ar Revenue By : Shri M.K.Gautam, Cit ( Cit (Dr) Date Of Hearing : 16/9/ 20 / 2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 16/ /9/2022 O R D E R Per Bench

section Under which TDS deducted 1. Contract works 2,89,34,855.45 or 5,78,700/- Partly disclosed 2,89

DILLIP KUMAR NAYAK,BHUBANESWAR vs. JCIT, RANGE-2, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.330 & 339/Ctk/2017 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2011-2012 & 2012-2013) Shri Dilip Kumar Nayak, Vs. Jcit, Range-2, Bhubaneswar Plot No.270/A, Saheed Nagar, Bhubaneswar, Dist: Khurda, Odisha-751016 स्थायी ऱेखा सं./ Pan No. : Aahpn 0352 M (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. यनधागररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri P.K.Mishra, Advocate राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Subhendu Dutta, Dr

Section 201(1A) of the Act on account of payments made to the two parties of Rs.47,94,340/- without deducting the TDS as well on balance payments on which no TDS had been made. 14. We further find from the submissions of the assessee that he could not furnish certificate in respect of balance additions confirmed

PARADEEP PHOSPHATES LTD.,BHUBANESWAR vs. JCIT, RANGE-1, BHUBANESWAR, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes and appeal of Revenue is dismissed

89,532/- made by the AO on account of repair and maintenance expenditure which was purely capital in nature. 5. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A) Is not justified in taw as well as on facts in deleting the addition. of Rs.22,52,169/- made by the AO on account of miscellaneous

SUBHALAXMI AGENCIES PVT. LTD.,NAYAGARH vs. JCIT, RAMGE-2, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeal of the revenue is partly allowed and that of

Bench: S/Shri N.S Saini & Pavan Kumar Gadale

section 194C(5) of the Act, which provides that in such cases no TDS was to be deducted from the payments made for transportation of goods and, therefore, no disallowance can be made u/s.40(a)(ia) of the Act for non-deduction of TDS from such payments. We find that the assessee before the CIT(A) relied on the decision

DCIT, BHUBANESWAR vs. NEELACHAL ISPAT NIGAM LTD., BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals filed by the revenue in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri N.S.Saini, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita Nos.382, 298, 435, 299, 436 & 448/Ctk/2015 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2006-07, 2007-08,2008-09, 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13) Dcit, Corporate Circle- Vs. Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. & Cross Objection Nos.48, 37, 53, 38 & 54/Ctk/2015 (Arising Out Of Ita Nos.382, 298,435,299,& 436/Ctk/2015) (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2006-07, 2007-08,2008-09, 2010-11, 2011-12) Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., Vs. Acit, Corporate Circle- 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. & आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.09/Ctk/2016 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2012-2013) Acit, Corporate Circle- Vs. Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Kunal Singh, Dr ननधााररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Satyajit Mishra, Ar

Section 143(3)/147, dated 31.7.2013. 5. Aggrieved by the order of AO, the assessee preferred appeal before the CIT(A). In the appellate proceedings ld. CIT(A) on the disputed issue of payment of commission at 3% to MMTC Ltd. found that similar issue was decided by the ITAT in assessee’s own case in ITA Nos.295 to 298/CTK/2013

DCIT, BHUBANESWAR vs. NEELACHAL ISPAT NIGAM LTD., BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals filed by the revenue in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri N.S.Saini, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita Nos.382, 298, 435, 299, 436 & 448/Ctk/2015 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2006-07, 2007-08,2008-09, 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13) Dcit, Corporate Circle- Vs. Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. & Cross Objection Nos.48, 37, 53, 38 & 54/Ctk/2015 (Arising Out Of Ita Nos.382, 298,435,299,& 436/Ctk/2015) (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2006-07, 2007-08,2008-09, 2010-11, 2011-12) Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., Vs. Acit, Corporate Circle- 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. & आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.09/Ctk/2016 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2012-2013) Acit, Corporate Circle- Vs. Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Kunal Singh, Dr ननधााररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Satyajit Mishra, Ar

Section 143(3)/147, dated 31.7.2013. 5. Aggrieved by the order of AO, the assessee preferred appeal before the CIT(A). In the appellate proceedings ld. CIT(A) on the disputed issue of payment of commission at 3% to MMTC Ltd. found that similar issue was decided by the ITAT in assessee’s own case in ITA Nos.295 to 298/CTK/2013

DCIT, BHUBANESWAR vs. M/S. NEELACHAL ISPAT NIGAM LIMITED, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals filed by the revenue in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri N.S.Saini, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita Nos.382, 298, 435, 299, 436 & 448/Ctk/2015 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2006-07, 2007-08,2008-09, 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13) Dcit, Corporate Circle- Vs. Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. & Cross Objection Nos.48, 37, 53, 38 & 54/Ctk/2015 (Arising Out Of Ita Nos.382, 298,435,299,& 436/Ctk/2015) (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2006-07, 2007-08,2008-09, 2010-11, 2011-12) Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., Vs. Acit, Corporate Circle- 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. & आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.09/Ctk/2016 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2012-2013) Acit, Corporate Circle- Vs. Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Kunal Singh, Dr ननधााररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Satyajit Mishra, Ar

Section 143(3)/147, dated 31.7.2013. 5. Aggrieved by the order of AO, the assessee preferred appeal before the CIT(A). In the appellate proceedings ld. CIT(A) on the disputed issue of payment of commission at 3% to MMTC Ltd. found that similar issue was decided by the ITAT in assessee’s own case in ITA Nos.295 to 298/CTK/2013

ACIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE-1(2), BHUBANESWAR vs. M/S. NEELACHAL ISPAT NIGAM LIMITED, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals filed by the revenue in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri N.S.Saini, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita Nos.382, 298, 435, 299, 436 & 448/Ctk/2015 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2006-07, 2007-08,2008-09, 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13) Dcit, Corporate Circle- Vs. Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. & Cross Objection Nos.48, 37, 53, 38 & 54/Ctk/2015 (Arising Out Of Ita Nos.382, 298,435,299,& 436/Ctk/2015) (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2006-07, 2007-08,2008-09, 2010-11, 2011-12) Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., Vs. Acit, Corporate Circle- 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. & आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.09/Ctk/2016 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2012-2013) Acit, Corporate Circle- Vs. Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Kunal Singh, Dr ननधााररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Satyajit Mishra, Ar

Section 143(3)/147, dated 31.7.2013. 5. Aggrieved by the order of AO, the assessee preferred appeal before the CIT(A). In the appellate proceedings ld. CIT(A) on the disputed issue of payment of commission at 3% to MMTC Ltd. found that similar issue was decided by the ITAT in assessee’s own case in ITA Nos.295 to 298/CTK/2013

ACIT, BHUBANESWAR vs. M/S. NEELACHAL ISPAT NIGAM LTD., BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals filed by the revenue in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri N.S.Saini, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita Nos.382, 298, 435, 299, 436 & 448/Ctk/2015 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2006-07, 2007-08,2008-09, 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13) Dcit, Corporate Circle- Vs. Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. & Cross Objection Nos.48, 37, 53, 38 & 54/Ctk/2015 (Arising Out Of Ita Nos.382, 298,435,299,& 436/Ctk/2015) (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2006-07, 2007-08,2008-09, 2010-11, 2011-12) Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., Vs. Acit, Corporate Circle- 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. & आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.09/Ctk/2016 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2012-2013) Acit, Corporate Circle- Vs. Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Kunal Singh, Dr ननधााररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Satyajit Mishra, Ar

Section 143(3)/147, dated 31.7.2013. 5. Aggrieved by the order of AO, the assessee preferred appeal before the CIT(A). In the appellate proceedings ld. CIT(A) on the disputed issue of payment of commission at 3% to MMTC Ltd. found that similar issue was decided by the ITAT in assessee’s own case in ITA Nos.295 to 298/CTK/2013

DCIT, BHUBANESWAR vs. M/S. NEELACHAL ISPAT NIGAM LIMITED, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals filed by the revenue in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri N.S.Saini, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita Nos.382, 298, 435, 299, 436 & 448/Ctk/2015 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2006-07, 2007-08,2008-09, 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13) Dcit, Corporate Circle- Vs. Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. & Cross Objection Nos.48, 37, 53, 38 & 54/Ctk/2015 (Arising Out Of Ita Nos.382, 298,435,299,& 436/Ctk/2015) (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2006-07, 2007-08,2008-09, 2010-11, 2011-12) Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., Vs. Acit, Corporate Circle- 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. & आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.09/Ctk/2016 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2012-2013) Acit, Corporate Circle- Vs. Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Kunal Singh, Dr ननधााररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Satyajit Mishra, Ar

Section 143(3)/147, dated 31.7.2013. 5. Aggrieved by the order of AO, the assessee preferred appeal before the CIT(A). In the appellate proceedings ld. CIT(A) on the disputed issue of payment of commission at 3% to MMTC Ltd. found that similar issue was decided by the ITAT in assessee’s own case in ITA Nos.295 to 298/CTK/2013

ACIT(TDS), BHUBANESWAR vs. NEELACHAL ISPAT NIGAM LIMITED, JAJPUR

In the result, appeals filed by the revenue in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri N.S.Saini, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita Nos.382, 298, 435, 299, 436 & 448/Ctk/2015 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2006-07, 2007-08,2008-09, 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13) Dcit, Corporate Circle- Vs. Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. & Cross Objection Nos.48, 37, 53, 38 & 54/Ctk/2015 (Arising Out Of Ita Nos.382, 298,435,299,& 436/Ctk/2015) (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2006-07, 2007-08,2008-09, 2010-11, 2011-12) Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., Vs. Acit, Corporate Circle- 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. & आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.09/Ctk/2016 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2012-2013) Acit, Corporate Circle- Vs. Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Kunal Singh, Dr ननधााररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Satyajit Mishra, Ar

Section 143(3)/147, dated 31.7.2013. 5. Aggrieved by the order of AO, the assessee preferred appeal before the CIT(A). In the appellate proceedings ld. CIT(A) on the disputed issue of payment of commission at 3% to MMTC Ltd. found that similar issue was decided by the ITAT in assessee’s own case in ITA Nos.295 to 298/CTK/2013

ACIT, CIRCLE-2(1), CUTTACK vs. PATTNAIK MINERALS PRIVATE LTD., KEONJHAR

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

Bench: S/Shri N.S Saini & Pavan Kumar Gadaleassessment Year : 2007-2008

TDS have been duly made from the payments of interest for the months of October, November, December, January and February of the Financial Year 2006-07 and were deposited to the Central Govt. Account on 07.06.2007. The assessee referred to the amendment made to Section 40(a)(ia) by the Finance Act, 2010 from 1st April, 2010 where

M/S. SHREE BALAJI ENGICONS PVT. LTD.,BELPAHAR, JHARSUGUDA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), SAMBALPUR, SAMBALPUR

In the result, appeals of the assesee in IT(SS)A No

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Manish Agarwalit(Ss)A No.77/Ctk/2023

section 20 of the Indian Contract Act has great relevance. It turns out that the formats of the agreement entered into with the partners and the styling of accounts prepared 25 IT(SS)A No.77 & ITA Nos.320,296,88, 141,89,142,13/CTK/2023 &CO No.02/CTK/2023 by them are products of mistakes of fact, and therefore, the agreement

ASST. CIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, SAMBALPUR, AAYAKAR BHAWAN, SAMBALPUR vs. SHREE BALAJI ENGICON LIMITED, BELPAHAR RS

In the result, appeals of the assesee in IT(SS)A No

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Manish Agarwalit(Ss)A No.77/Ctk/2023

section 20 of the Indian Contract Act has great relevance. It turns out that the formats of the agreement entered into with the partners and the styling of accounts prepared 25 IT(SS)A No.77 & ITA Nos.320,296,88, 141,89,142,13/CTK/2023 &CO No.02/CTK/2023 by them are products of mistakes of fact, and therefore, the agreement