BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “TDS”+ Section 801clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi168Mumbai137Kolkata64Hyderabad63Bangalore39Ahmedabad34Chennai32Jaipur31Nagpur16Lucknow11Jodhpur9Indore9Visakhapatnam8Cuttack6Surat6Agra5Dehradun5Pune5Raipur5Chandigarh4Rajkot3Guwahati2Amritsar1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 201(1)24Section 20118Section 17(2)12Section 106Section 156Section 194A6Exemption6Deduction6TDS6Addition to Income

BRANCH MANAGER, L I C OF INDIA,ROURKELA vs. ITO, ROURKELA

In the result, all appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 196/CTK/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack17 Feb 2020AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Shri Sunakar Mahanty, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Subhendu Dutta, DR
Section 10Section 15Section 17(2)Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)

801/- 3. ITA No.218/CTK/19 2011-2012 Rs.1,72,582/- Rs.34,597/- 4. ITA No.219/CTK/19 2012-2013 Rs.33,578/- Rs.2,686/- 5. ITA No.250/CTK/19 2011-2012 Rs.1,39,001/- Rs.26,410/- 6. ITA No.251/CTK/19 2012-2013 Rs.40,824/- Rs.2,858/- 4. Feeling aggrieved from the order of AO, the assessee appealed before the CIT(A), however, the CIT(A) dismissed

6

BRANCH MANAGER, LIC OF INDIA,ROURKELA vs. ITO(TDS), ROURKELA

In the result, all appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 199/CTK/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack17 Feb 2020AY 2011-12
For Appellant: Shri Sunakar Mahanty, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Subhendu Dutta, DR
Section 10Section 15Section 17(2)Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)

801/- 3. ITA No.218/CTK/19 2011-2012 Rs.1,72,582/- Rs.34,597/- 4. ITA No.219/CTK/19 2012-2013 Rs.33,578/- Rs.2,686/- 5. ITA No.250/CTK/19 2011-2012 Rs.1,39,001/- Rs.26,410/- 6. ITA No.251/CTK/19 2012-2013 Rs.40,824/- Rs.2,858/- 4. Feeling aggrieved from the order of AO, the assessee appealed before the CIT(A), however, the CIT(A) dismissed

LIC OF INDIA,ROURKELA vs. ITO(TDS), ROURKELA

In the result, all appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 218/CTK/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack17 Feb 2020AY 2011-12
For Appellant: Shri Sunakar Mahanty, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Subhendu Dutta, DR
Section 10Section 15Section 17(2)Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)

801/- 3. ITA No.218/CTK/19 2011-2012 Rs.1,72,582/- Rs.34,597/- 4. ITA No.219/CTK/19 2012-2013 Rs.33,578/- Rs.2,686/- 5. ITA No.250/CTK/19 2011-2012 Rs.1,39,001/- Rs.26,410/- 6. ITA No.251/CTK/19 2012-2013 Rs.40,824/- Rs.2,858/- 4. Feeling aggrieved from the order of AO, the assessee appealed before the CIT(A), however, the CIT(A) dismissed

LIC OF INDIA,ROURKELA vs. ITO(TDS), ROURKELA

In the result, all appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 219/CTK/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack13 Feb 2020AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Shri Sunakar Mahanty, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Subhendu Dutta, DR
Section 10Section 15Section 17(2)Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)

801/- 3. ITA No.218/CTK/19 2011-2012 Rs.1,72,582/- Rs.34,597/- 4. ITA No.219/CTK/19 2012-2013 Rs.33,578/- Rs.2,686/- 5. ITA No.250/CTK/19 2011-2012 Rs.1,39,001/- Rs.26,410/- 6. ITA No.251/CTK/19 2012-2013 Rs.40,824/- Rs.2,858/- 4. Feeling aggrieved from the order of AO, the assessee appealed before the CIT(A), however, the CIT(A) dismissed

PRAHALLAD BEHERA,ROURKELA vs. ITO(TDS),, ROURKELA

In the result, all appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 250/CTK/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack13 Feb 2020AY 2011-12
For Appellant: Shri Sunakar Mahanty, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Subhendu Dutta, DR
Section 10Section 15Section 17(2)Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)

801/- 3. ITA No.218/CTK/19 2011-2012 Rs.1,72,582/- Rs.34,597/- 4. ITA No.219/CTK/19 2012-2013 Rs.33,578/- Rs.2,686/- 5. ITA No.250/CTK/19 2011-2012 Rs.1,39,001/- Rs.26,410/- 6. ITA No.251/CTK/19 2012-2013 Rs.40,824/- Rs.2,858/- 4. Feeling aggrieved from the order of AO, the assessee appealed before the CIT(A), however, the CIT(A) dismissed

LIC OF INDIA,ROURKELA vs. ITO(TDS), ROURKELA, ROUKELA

In the result, all appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 251/CTK/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack13 Feb 2020AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Shri Sunakar Mahanty, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Subhendu Dutta, DR
Section 10Section 15Section 17(2)Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)

801/- 3. ITA No.218/CTK/19 2011-2012 Rs.1,72,582/- Rs.34,597/- 4. ITA No.219/CTK/19 2012-2013 Rs.33,578/- Rs.2,686/- 5. ITA No.250/CTK/19 2011-2012 Rs.1,39,001/- Rs.26,410/- 6. ITA No.251/CTK/19 2012-2013 Rs.40,824/- Rs.2,858/- 4. Feeling aggrieved from the order of AO, the assessee appealed before the CIT(A), however, the CIT(A) dismissed