LUCKY OFFSET PVT. LTD. ,BERHAMPUR vs. ITO (TDS)-2, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.395 To 400/Ctk/2019 (Ay:2015-2016)( Quarter-1) 26Q (Ay:2015-2016)( Quarter-2) 26Q (Ay:2015-2016)(Quarter-3) 26Q (Ay:2015-2016) (Quarter-4) 26Q (Ay:2016-2017) (Quarter-3) 26Q (Ay:2016-2017) (Quarter-4) 26Q Lucky Offset Private Ltd. Vs. Ito(Tds)-1, Bhubaneswar D/24, Industrial Estate, Berhampur-760008 Pan No. Aaacl 3866 E, Tanno. : Bbnl00231A (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधाारिती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri A.K.Padhy, Fca िाजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri J.K.Lenka, Dr सुनवाई की तािीख / Date Of Hearing : 24/02/2020 घोषणा की तािीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 25/02/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : These Are The Six Appeals Have Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Cit(A)-1, Bhubaneswar All Dated 06.09.2019 For The 1St, 2Nd, 3Rd & 4Th Quarters For The Financial Year 2014-2015 Relevant To Assessment Year 2015-2016 & For The 3Rd & 4Th,Quarters For The Financial Year 2015-2016 Relevant To Assessment Year 2016-2017. 2. The Sole Issue Involved In All These Appeals Relating To Levy Of Late Filing Fees U/S.274E Of The Act. 3. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Is A Private Limited Company & Registered Under The Companies Act, 1956. The Assessee Filed The Tds Return For The Respective Quarters Belatedly, Therefore, The 2

253 50,600/- 2014-2015 26Q-4 15.05.2015 25.09.2015 133 26,600/- 2015-2016 26Q-3 15.01.2016 02.04.2016 78 15,600/- 2015-2016 26Q-4 16.05.2016 12.08.2016 88 17,600/- 4. Against the above demand raised u/s.234E of the Act, by the CPC(TDS), the assessee appealed before the CIT(A) and the CIT(A) dismissed all the appeals

LUCKY OFFSET PVT. LTD. ,BERHAMPUR vs. ITO (TDS)-2, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.395 To 400/Ctk/2019 (Ay:2015-2016)( Quarter-1) 26Q (Ay:2015-2016)( Quarter-2) 26Q (Ay:2015-2016)(Quarter-3) 26Q (Ay:2015-2016) (Quarter-4) 26Q (Ay:2016-2017) (Quarter-3) 26Q (Ay:2016-2017) (Quarter-4) 26Q Lucky Offset Private Ltd. Vs. Ito(Tds)-1, Bhubaneswar D/24, Industrial Estate, Berhampur-760008 Pan No. Aaacl 3866 E, Tanno. : Bbnl00231A (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधाारिती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri A.K.Padhy, Fca िाजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri J.K.Lenka, Dr सुनवाई की तािीख / Date Of Hearing : 24/02/2020 घोषणा की तािीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 25/02/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : These Are The Six Appeals Have Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Cit(A)-1, Bhubaneswar All Dated 06.09.2019 For The 1St, 2Nd, 3Rd & 4Th Quarters For The Financial Year 2014-2015 Relevant To Assessment Year 2015-2016 & For The 3Rd & 4Th,Quarters For The Financial Year 2015-2016 Relevant To Assessment Year 2016-2017. 2. The Sole Issue Involved In All These Appeals Relating To Levy Of Late Filing Fees U/S.274E Of The Act. 3. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Is A Private Limited Company & Registered Under The Companies Act, 1956. The Assessee Filed The Tds Return For The Respective Quarters Belatedly, Therefore, The 2

253 50,600/- 2014-2015 26Q-4 15.05.2015 25.09.2015 133 26,600/- 2015-2016 26Q-3 15.01.2016 02.04.2016 78 15,600/- 2015-2016 26Q-4 16.05.2016 12.08.2016 88 17,600/- 4. Against the above demand raised u/s.234E of the Act, by the CPC(TDS), the assessee appealed before the CIT(A) and the CIT(A) dismissed all the appeals

LUCKY OFFSET PVT. LTD. ,BERHAMPUR vs. ITO (TDS)-2, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.395 To 400/Ctk/2019 (Ay:2015-2016)( Quarter-1) 26Q (Ay:2015-2016)( Quarter-2) 26Q (Ay:2015-2016)(Quarter-3) 26Q (Ay:2015-2016) (Quarter-4) 26Q (Ay:2016-2017) (Quarter-3) 26Q (Ay:2016-2017) (Quarter-4) 26Q Lucky Offset Private Ltd. Vs. Ito(Tds)-1, Bhubaneswar D/24, Industrial Estate, Berhampur-760008 Pan No. Aaacl 3866 E, Tanno. : Bbnl00231A (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधाारिती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri A.K.Padhy, Fca िाजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri J.K.Lenka, Dr सुनवाई की तािीख / Date Of Hearing : 24/02/2020 घोषणा की तािीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 25/02/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : These Are The Six Appeals Have Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Cit(A)-1, Bhubaneswar All Dated 06.09.2019 For The 1St, 2Nd, 3Rd & 4Th Quarters For The Financial Year 2014-2015 Relevant To Assessment Year 2015-2016 & For The 3Rd & 4Th,Quarters For The Financial Year 2015-2016 Relevant To Assessment Year 2016-2017. 2. The Sole Issue Involved In All These Appeals Relating To Levy Of Late Filing Fees U/S.274E Of The Act. 3. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Is A Private Limited Company & Registered Under The Companies Act, 1956. The Assessee Filed The Tds Return For The Respective Quarters Belatedly, Therefore, The 2

253 50,600/- 2014-2015 26Q-4 15.05.2015 25.09.2015 133 26,600/- 2015-2016 26Q-3 15.01.2016 02.04.2016 78 15,600/- 2015-2016 26Q-4 16.05.2016 12.08.2016 88 17,600/- 4. Against the above demand raised u/s.234E of the Act, by the CPC(TDS), the assessee appealed before the CIT(A) and the CIT(A) dismissed all the appeals

LUCKY OFFSET PVT. LTD. ,BERHAMPUR vs. ITO (TDS)-2, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.395 To 400/Ctk/2019 (Ay:2015-2016)( Quarter-1) 26Q (Ay:2015-2016)( Quarter-2) 26Q (Ay:2015-2016)(Quarter-3) 26Q (Ay:2015-2016) (Quarter-4) 26Q (Ay:2016-2017) (Quarter-3) 26Q (Ay:2016-2017) (Quarter-4) 26Q Lucky Offset Private Ltd. Vs. Ito(Tds)-1, Bhubaneswar D/24, Industrial Estate, Berhampur-760008 Pan No. Aaacl 3866 E, Tanno. : Bbnl00231A (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधाारिती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri A.K.Padhy, Fca िाजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri J.K.Lenka, Dr सुनवाई की तािीख / Date Of Hearing : 24/02/2020 घोषणा की तािीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 25/02/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : These Are The Six Appeals Have Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Cit(A)-1, Bhubaneswar All Dated 06.09.2019 For The 1St, 2Nd, 3Rd & 4Th Quarters For The Financial Year 2014-2015 Relevant To Assessment Year 2015-2016 & For The 3Rd & 4Th,Quarters For The Financial Year 2015-2016 Relevant To Assessment Year 2016-2017. 2. The Sole Issue Involved In All These Appeals Relating To Levy Of Late Filing Fees U/S.274E Of The Act. 3. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Is A Private Limited Company & Registered Under The Companies Act, 1956. The Assessee Filed The Tds Return For The Respective Quarters Belatedly, Therefore, The 2

253 50,600/- 2014-2015 26Q-4 15.05.2015 25.09.2015 133 26,600/- 2015-2016 26Q-3 15.01.2016 02.04.2016 78 15,600/- 2015-2016 26Q-4 16.05.2016 12.08.2016 88 17,600/- 4. Against the above demand raised u/s.234E of the Act, by the CPC(TDS), the assessee appealed before the CIT(A) and the CIT(A) dismissed all the appeals

LUCKY OFFSET PVT. LTD. ,BERHAMPUR vs. ITO (TDS)-2, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.395 To 400/Ctk/2019 (Ay:2015-2016)( Quarter-1) 26Q (Ay:2015-2016)( Quarter-2) 26Q (Ay:2015-2016)(Quarter-3) 26Q (Ay:2015-2016) (Quarter-4) 26Q (Ay:2016-2017) (Quarter-3) 26Q (Ay:2016-2017) (Quarter-4) 26Q Lucky Offset Private Ltd. Vs. Ito(Tds)-1, Bhubaneswar D/24, Industrial Estate, Berhampur-760008 Pan No. Aaacl 3866 E, Tanno. : Bbnl00231A (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधाारिती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri A.K.Padhy, Fca िाजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri J.K.Lenka, Dr सुनवाई की तािीख / Date Of Hearing : 24/02/2020 घोषणा की तािीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 25/02/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : These Are The Six Appeals Have Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Cit(A)-1, Bhubaneswar All Dated 06.09.2019 For The 1St, 2Nd, 3Rd & 4Th Quarters For The Financial Year 2014-2015 Relevant To Assessment Year 2015-2016 & For The 3Rd & 4Th,Quarters For The Financial Year 2015-2016 Relevant To Assessment Year 2016-2017. 2. The Sole Issue Involved In All These Appeals Relating To Levy Of Late Filing Fees U/S.274E Of The Act. 3. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Is A Private Limited Company & Registered Under The Companies Act, 1956. The Assessee Filed The Tds Return For The Respective Quarters Belatedly, Therefore, The 2

253 50,600/- 2014-2015 26Q-4 15.05.2015 25.09.2015 133 26,600/- 2015-2016 26Q-3 15.01.2016 02.04.2016 78 15,600/- 2015-2016 26Q-4 16.05.2016 12.08.2016 88 17,600/- 4. Against the above demand raised u/s.234E of the Act, by the CPC(TDS), the assessee appealed before the CIT(A) and the CIT(A) dismissed all the appeals

LUCKY OFFSET PVT. LTD. ,BERHAMPUR vs. ITO (TDS)-2, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.395 To 400/Ctk/2019 (Ay:2015-2016)( Quarter-1) 26Q (Ay:2015-2016)( Quarter-2) 26Q (Ay:2015-2016)(Quarter-3) 26Q (Ay:2015-2016) (Quarter-4) 26Q (Ay:2016-2017) (Quarter-3) 26Q (Ay:2016-2017) (Quarter-4) 26Q Lucky Offset Private Ltd. Vs. Ito(Tds)-1, Bhubaneswar D/24, Industrial Estate, Berhampur-760008 Pan No. Aaacl 3866 E, Tanno. : Bbnl00231A (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधाारिती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri A.K.Padhy, Fca िाजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri J.K.Lenka, Dr सुनवाई की तािीख / Date Of Hearing : 24/02/2020 घोषणा की तािीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 25/02/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : These Are The Six Appeals Have Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Cit(A)-1, Bhubaneswar All Dated 06.09.2019 For The 1St, 2Nd, 3Rd & 4Th Quarters For The Financial Year 2014-2015 Relevant To Assessment Year 2015-2016 & For The 3Rd & 4Th,Quarters For The Financial Year 2015-2016 Relevant To Assessment Year 2016-2017. 2. The Sole Issue Involved In All These Appeals Relating To Levy Of Late Filing Fees U/S.274E Of The Act. 3. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Is A Private Limited Company & Registered Under The Companies Act, 1956. The Assessee Filed The Tds Return For The Respective Quarters Belatedly, Therefore, The 2

253 50,600/- 2014-2015 26Q-4 15.05.2015 25.09.2015 133 26,600/- 2015-2016 26Q-3 15.01.2016 02.04.2016 78 15,600/- 2015-2016 26Q-4 16.05.2016 12.08.2016 88 17,600/- 4. Against the above demand raised u/s.234E of the Act, by the CPC(TDS), the assessee appealed before the CIT(A) and the CIT(A) dismissed all the appeals

COMMISSIONER, CUTTACK MUNICIPAL CORPORATION,CUTTACK vs. ITO(TDS), CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rajesh Kumarआयकर अऩीऱ सं/Ita No.83/Ctk/2020 (ननधाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2014-2015) Commissioner, Vs Ito (Tds), Cuttack Cuttack Municipal Corporation, Choudhury Bazar, Dist: Cuttack Tan No. :Bbnc 00195 G (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधााररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri P.K.Mishra & Sanjeev Swain, Advs राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Charan Dass, Sr. Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 12/10/2023 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 12/10/2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld. Cit(A), Cuttack, Dated 31.10.2019, Passed In I.T.Appeal No.0398/2015- 16 For The Assessment Year 2014-2015. 2. The Appeal Of The Assessee Is Delayed By 25 Days For Which The Assessee Has Filed Necessary Application For Condonation Of Delay & The Affidavit. The Reason For Delay Is Mentioned To Be On Account Of Urinary Infection & High Blood Pressure & The Consequential Medical Treatment. The Affidavit Filed By The Assessee Has Not Been Controverted By The Revenue. Consequently, The Delay In Filing The Present Appeal Is Condoned & The Appeal Is Disposed Off On Merits. 3. It Was Submitted By The Ld. Ar That The Issue In The Appeal Was Against Holding The Assessee As An Assessee In Default For Non-Deduction

253 ITR 310 (Gujarat), wherein it has been held that if the tax was duly paid and that too at the time when it had become due, it would not be proper on the part of the revenue to levy any interest under section 201(1A) of the Act, especially when the contractor had paid more amount

MR. MANOJ KUMAR NAYAK,BHUBANESWAR vs. DDIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, BHUBANESWAR, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

253; Ram Phal Kunduv. Kamal Sharma [2004] 2 SCC 759 and Indian Bank's Association v. Devkala Consultancy Service AIR 2004 SC 2615). 18. Therefore, we are of the view that the learned Assessing Officer is fully justified in completing the assessment under Section 143(3) of the I.T. Act on the basis of the original return filed under Section

ITO, KHURDA vs. BULARAM DALAI, KHURDA

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

253 (Delhi), have held as under: "22. Undoubtedly, explanation - 1 to Section 147 indicates that mere production of account books or other evidence before the Assessing Officer would not necessarily amount to disclosure of the material information by the assessee. But 7 then, the explanation clarifies the said general refrain by the words "not necessarily". Therefore, the burden is equally

KAMLESH KUMAR JAIN,JAJPUR vs. CIT, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri N.S.Saini, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.265/Ctk/2015 (धनधाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2010-2011) Sri Kamlesh Kumar Jain, Vs. Cit, Cuttack C/O-Jain Transport, Chandikhole, At-Sunguda, Jajpur स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aejpj 7987 H (अपीलाथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) निर्ााररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri R.K.Jhunjhunwala, Ar राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri A.K.Mohapatra, Citdr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 19/09/2017 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement 22/09/2017 आदेश / O R D E R Per Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm: The Assessee Has Filed An Appeal Against The Order Of Cit, Cuttack, Dated 31.03.2015, Passed U/S.263 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 For The Assessment Year 2009-2010, Wherein The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds :- 1. For That The Learned Cit Has Erred Both In Law & Fact In Invoking The Provisions Of Section 263 Without Satisfying The Requirement Of Law. 2. For That, The Learned Cit Is Wrong & Unlawful In Passing An Order Under Section 263 For Having Disagreement With The Opinion Of Ao, Which Is Not Unlawful. 3. For That The Learned Cit Has Erred Both In Law & Fact By Holding That Exercise Of Power Under Section 263 Is Justified Even In Case Of In Adequate Inquiry By Ao. 4. For That The Learned Cit (Appeal) Has Erred Both In Law & Fact By Passing Order By Exercising Power Under Section 263 Without Having Any Cogent Material On Hand. 5. The Assessee Craves The Leave Of This Honorable Bench To Add, Alter, Modify, Substitute Anv Of The Above Grounds Or Submit Any Fresh Additional Grounds During Appeal Proceeding.

3. For that the learned CIT has erred both in law & fact by holding that exercise of power under section 263 is justified even in case of in adequate inquiry by AO. 4. For that the learned CIT (Appeal) has erred both in law & fact by passing order by exercising power under section 263 without having any cogent material