Search: TDS | BharatTax

6 results for “TDS”+ Section 240clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 26312 Section 14A8 Section 143(3)6 Addition to Income5 TDS3 Section 40A(2)(b)2 Section 234B2 Section 120(4)(b)2 Section 1482 Transfer Pricing

ITO, ANGUL WARD, ANGUL vs. NCC-SMASL-JRT(JV), ANGUL

ITA 39/CTK/2018[2013-14]Status: HeardITAT Cuttack25 Jul 2024AY 2013-14

For Appellant: Shri Salil Kapoor and Bibhu Jain, AdvsFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Kumar, CIT-DR

Section 40A(2)(b)

TDS was claimed. The case was taken up for scrutiny and during the course of assessment proceedings, the AO observed that the assessee has claimed direct expenses of Rs.25,97,41,438/- i.e. the amount equivalent to the gross receipts of the assessee-JV. The said amount was paid to three Joint Ventures constituents who had executed the work

ITO, ANGUL WARD, , ANGUL vs. M/S. NCC SMASL JRT(JV),, ANGUL

ITA 99/CTK/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack25 Jul 2024AY 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri Salil Kapoor and Bibhu Jain, Advs Shri Sanjay Kumar, CIT-DR

ITO, ANGUL WARD, ANGUL vs. NCC-SMASL-JRT(JV), ANGUL

ITO, ANGUL WARD, , ANGUL vs. M/S. NCC SMASL JRT(JV),, ANGUL

ITO, ANGUL WARD, ANGUL vs. NCC-SMASL-JRT(JV), ANGUL

ITO, ANGUL WARD, , ANGUL vs. M/S. NCC SMASL JRT(JV),, ANGUL

M/S. ALTRADE MINERALS PVT. LIMITED,ROURKELA vs. ACIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE, SAMBALPUR, SAMBALPUR

SISKHA 'O' ANUSANDHAN,BHUBANESWAR vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), , HYDERABAD

RABINDRA KUMAR MOHANTY,BHUBANESWAR vs. ITO, WARD-2(2), BHUBANESWAR

NATIONAL ALUMINIUM COMPANY LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR vs. PRINCIPAL CIT-1, BHUBANESWAR