BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

12 results for “TDS”+ Section 220(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi580Patna469Mumbai379Bangalore145Pune127Hyderabad95Karnataka91Chennai87Cochin82Visakhapatnam64Ahmedabad60Jaipur59Kolkata54Indore47Raipur35Lucknow34Chandigarh33Nagpur19Cuttack12Rajkot12Jodhpur10Dehradun10Kerala8Agra6Surat5Amritsar5Ranchi4SC2Varanasi2Panaji2Guwahati1Rajasthan1Calcutta1Telangana1

Key Topics

Section 234E42Section 20121Section 220(2)14TDS9Section 1547Section 201(1)7Section 200A7Section 1476Section 685Addition to Income

RUKMANI INFRA PROJECTS PVT. LTD.,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1(2), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 358/CTK/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack30 Mar 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.358/Ctk/2017 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2013-2014) Rukmani Infra Projects Ltd., Vs Acit, Circle-1(2), Bhubaneswar Plot No.251, District Centre, C.S.Pur, Bhubaneswar-16 Pan No. : Aaecr 1585 L (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. यनधागररती की ओर से /Assessee By : None : Shri Manoj Kumar Goutam, Cit-Dr राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 08/03/2022 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 30/03/2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Arun Khodpia, Am : This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Has Been Directed Against The Order Passed By The Ld. Cit(A)-1, Bhubaneswar, Dated 16.06.2017, For The Assessment Year 2013-2014. 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Extracted From The Available Records Are That, The Assessee, A Company Incorporated Under The Companies Act, 1956, Engaged In The Business Of Erection, Commissioning, Technical & Maintenance Service To Different Power Plants. The Return Of Income For The Ay 2013-14 Was Filed By The Assessee On 01.10.2013 Declaring A Total Income Of Rs.1,65,91,030/-. The Case Of The Assessee Was Selected Under Cass. Notice U/S 143(2) & 143(1) Were Issued & Served On The Assessee. Assessment Proceedings Were Completed By The Ao & Concluded With An Addition Of Rs.3,58,95,574/- Under Four Different

For Appellant: None
Section 143(2)Section 68

220/- paid as interest on late deposit of TDS without considering the ground reality of the facts. The assessee has saved working capital which has more interest than the above. Hence the addition is liable to be quashed. 6. That the Appellant craves the leave of the Hon'ble Bench to add, alter, amend, modify, substitute, delete and/or rescind

5
Disallowance3

DIRECTOR OF PHYSICAL PLANT O.U.A.T,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT(CPC-TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, appeals of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 7/CTK/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack14 Oct 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.05 To 11/Ctk/2020 (Ay:2010-2011)(4Th Quarter) 26Q (Ay:2011-2012)(4Th Quarter) 26Q (Ay:2012-2013)(4Th Quarter) 26Q (Ay:2013-2014)(4Th Quarter) 26Q (Ay:2014-2015) (2Nd Quarter)26Q (Ay:2014-2015)(3Rd Quarter) 26Q (Ay:2017-2018) (4Th Quarter)26Q Director Of Physical Plant, Ouat Vs. Acit(Cpc-Tds), Ghaziabad Siripur, Bhubaneswar District : Khurda Tan No. : Bbnd 00486 D (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधाारिती की ओर से /Assessee By : None िाजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Subhendu Dutta, Dr सुनवाई की तािीख / Date Of Hearing : 14/10/2020 घोषणा की तािीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 16/10/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench: The Assessee Has Filed These Seven Appeals Against The Order Of Cit(A)-1, Bhubaneswar, Dated 22.10.2019 & 16.10.2019 For The A.Ys. 2010-2011, 2011-2012, 2012-2013, 2013-2014, 2014-2015 & 2017- 2018, Respectively 2. None Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Even The Case Was Called For Second Round Of Hearing. Applications Dated 14.10.2020 Have Been 2

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Subhendu Dutta, DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 220(2)Section 234E

220(2) of the Act. Further, the ACIT(TDS-CPC) has also levied late fee u/s.234E of the Act for Quarter-2nd & 3rd (AY: 2014- 2015). Aggrieved thereby, the assessee preferred appeal before the CIT(A) and the CIT(A) upheld the action of ACIT(TDS-CPC) and dismissed the appeals of the assessee. 6. None appeared on behalf

DIRECTOR OF PHYSICAL PLANT O.U.A.T,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT(CPC-TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, appeals of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 8/CTK/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack14 Oct 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.05 To 11/Ctk/2020 (Ay:2010-2011)(4Th Quarter) 26Q (Ay:2011-2012)(4Th Quarter) 26Q (Ay:2012-2013)(4Th Quarter) 26Q (Ay:2013-2014)(4Th Quarter) 26Q (Ay:2014-2015) (2Nd Quarter)26Q (Ay:2014-2015)(3Rd Quarter) 26Q (Ay:2017-2018) (4Th Quarter)26Q Director Of Physical Plant, Ouat Vs. Acit(Cpc-Tds), Ghaziabad Siripur, Bhubaneswar District : Khurda Tan No. : Bbnd 00486 D (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधाारिती की ओर से /Assessee By : None िाजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Subhendu Dutta, Dr सुनवाई की तािीख / Date Of Hearing : 14/10/2020 घोषणा की तािीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 16/10/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench: The Assessee Has Filed These Seven Appeals Against The Order Of Cit(A)-1, Bhubaneswar, Dated 22.10.2019 & 16.10.2019 For The A.Ys. 2010-2011, 2011-2012, 2012-2013, 2013-2014, 2014-2015 & 2017- 2018, Respectively 2. None Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Even The Case Was Called For Second Round Of Hearing. Applications Dated 14.10.2020 Have Been 2

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Subhendu Dutta, DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 220(2)Section 234E

220(2) of the Act. Further, the ACIT(TDS-CPC) has also levied late fee u/s.234E of the Act for Quarter-2nd & 3rd (AY: 2014- 2015). Aggrieved thereby, the assessee preferred appeal before the CIT(A) and the CIT(A) upheld the action of ACIT(TDS-CPC) and dismissed the appeals of the assessee. 6. None appeared on behalf

DIRECTOR OF PHYSICAL PLANT O.U.A.T,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT(CPC-TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, appeals of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 10/CTK/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack14 Oct 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.05 To 11/Ctk/2020 (Ay:2010-2011)(4Th Quarter) 26Q (Ay:2011-2012)(4Th Quarter) 26Q (Ay:2012-2013)(4Th Quarter) 26Q (Ay:2013-2014)(4Th Quarter) 26Q (Ay:2014-2015) (2Nd Quarter)26Q (Ay:2014-2015)(3Rd Quarter) 26Q (Ay:2017-2018) (4Th Quarter)26Q Director Of Physical Plant, Ouat Vs. Acit(Cpc-Tds), Ghaziabad Siripur, Bhubaneswar District : Khurda Tan No. : Bbnd 00486 D (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधाारिती की ओर से /Assessee By : None िाजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Subhendu Dutta, Dr सुनवाई की तािीख / Date Of Hearing : 14/10/2020 घोषणा की तािीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 16/10/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench: The Assessee Has Filed These Seven Appeals Against The Order Of Cit(A)-1, Bhubaneswar, Dated 22.10.2019 & 16.10.2019 For The A.Ys. 2010-2011, 2011-2012, 2012-2013, 2013-2014, 2014-2015 & 2017- 2018, Respectively 2. None Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Even The Case Was Called For Second Round Of Hearing. Applications Dated 14.10.2020 Have Been 2

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Subhendu Dutta, DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 220(2)Section 234E

220(2) of the Act. Further, the ACIT(TDS-CPC) has also levied late fee u/s.234E of the Act for Quarter-2nd & 3rd (AY: 2014- 2015). Aggrieved thereby, the assessee preferred appeal before the CIT(A) and the CIT(A) upheld the action of ACIT(TDS-CPC) and dismissed the appeals of the assessee. 6. None appeared on behalf

DIRECTOR OF PHYSICAL PLANT O.U.A.T,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT(CPC-TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, appeals of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 11/CTK/2020[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack14 Oct 2020AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.05 To 11/Ctk/2020 (Ay:2010-2011)(4Th Quarter) 26Q (Ay:2011-2012)(4Th Quarter) 26Q (Ay:2012-2013)(4Th Quarter) 26Q (Ay:2013-2014)(4Th Quarter) 26Q (Ay:2014-2015) (2Nd Quarter)26Q (Ay:2014-2015)(3Rd Quarter) 26Q (Ay:2017-2018) (4Th Quarter)26Q Director Of Physical Plant, Ouat Vs. Acit(Cpc-Tds), Ghaziabad Siripur, Bhubaneswar District : Khurda Tan No. : Bbnd 00486 D (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधाारिती की ओर से /Assessee By : None िाजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Subhendu Dutta, Dr सुनवाई की तािीख / Date Of Hearing : 14/10/2020 घोषणा की तािीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 16/10/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench: The Assessee Has Filed These Seven Appeals Against The Order Of Cit(A)-1, Bhubaneswar, Dated 22.10.2019 & 16.10.2019 For The A.Ys. 2010-2011, 2011-2012, 2012-2013, 2013-2014, 2014-2015 & 2017- 2018, Respectively 2. None Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Even The Case Was Called For Second Round Of Hearing. Applications Dated 14.10.2020 Have Been 2

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Subhendu Dutta, DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 220(2)Section 234E

220(2) of the Act. Further, the ACIT(TDS-CPC) has also levied late fee u/s.234E of the Act for Quarter-2nd & 3rd (AY: 2014- 2015). Aggrieved thereby, the assessee preferred appeal before the CIT(A) and the CIT(A) upheld the action of ACIT(TDS-CPC) and dismissed the appeals of the assessee. 6. None appeared on behalf

DIRECTOR OF PHYSICAL PLANT O.U.A.T,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT(CPC-TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, appeals of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 5/CTK/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack14 Oct 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.05 To 11/Ctk/2020 (Ay:2010-2011)(4Th Quarter) 26Q (Ay:2011-2012)(4Th Quarter) 26Q (Ay:2012-2013)(4Th Quarter) 26Q (Ay:2013-2014)(4Th Quarter) 26Q (Ay:2014-2015) (2Nd Quarter)26Q (Ay:2014-2015)(3Rd Quarter) 26Q (Ay:2017-2018) (4Th Quarter)26Q Director Of Physical Plant, Ouat Vs. Acit(Cpc-Tds), Ghaziabad Siripur, Bhubaneswar District : Khurda Tan No. : Bbnd 00486 D (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधाारिती की ओर से /Assessee By : None िाजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Subhendu Dutta, Dr सुनवाई की तािीख / Date Of Hearing : 14/10/2020 घोषणा की तािीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 16/10/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench: The Assessee Has Filed These Seven Appeals Against The Order Of Cit(A)-1, Bhubaneswar, Dated 22.10.2019 & 16.10.2019 For The A.Ys. 2010-2011, 2011-2012, 2012-2013, 2013-2014, 2014-2015 & 2017- 2018, Respectively 2. None Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Even The Case Was Called For Second Round Of Hearing. Applications Dated 14.10.2020 Have Been 2

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Subhendu Dutta, DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 220(2)Section 234E

220(2) of the Act. Further, the ACIT(TDS-CPC) has also levied late fee u/s.234E of the Act for Quarter-2nd & 3rd (AY: 2014- 2015). Aggrieved thereby, the assessee preferred appeal before the CIT(A) and the CIT(A) upheld the action of ACIT(TDS-CPC) and dismissed the appeals of the assessee. 6. None appeared on behalf

DIRECTOR OF PHYSICAL PLANT O.U.A.T,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT(CPC-TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, appeals of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 6/CTK/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack14 Oct 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.05 To 11/Ctk/2020 (Ay:2010-2011)(4Th Quarter) 26Q (Ay:2011-2012)(4Th Quarter) 26Q (Ay:2012-2013)(4Th Quarter) 26Q (Ay:2013-2014)(4Th Quarter) 26Q (Ay:2014-2015) (2Nd Quarter)26Q (Ay:2014-2015)(3Rd Quarter) 26Q (Ay:2017-2018) (4Th Quarter)26Q Director Of Physical Plant, Ouat Vs. Acit(Cpc-Tds), Ghaziabad Siripur, Bhubaneswar District : Khurda Tan No. : Bbnd 00486 D (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधाारिती की ओर से /Assessee By : None िाजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Subhendu Dutta, Dr सुनवाई की तािीख / Date Of Hearing : 14/10/2020 घोषणा की तािीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 16/10/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench: The Assessee Has Filed These Seven Appeals Against The Order Of Cit(A)-1, Bhubaneswar, Dated 22.10.2019 & 16.10.2019 For The A.Ys. 2010-2011, 2011-2012, 2012-2013, 2013-2014, 2014-2015 & 2017- 2018, Respectively 2. None Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Even The Case Was Called For Second Round Of Hearing. Applications Dated 14.10.2020 Have Been 2

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Subhendu Dutta, DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 220(2)Section 234E

220(2) of the Act. Further, the ACIT(TDS-CPC) has also levied late fee u/s.234E of the Act for Quarter-2nd & 3rd (AY: 2014- 2015). Aggrieved thereby, the assessee preferred appeal before the CIT(A) and the CIT(A) upheld the action of ACIT(TDS-CPC) and dismissed the appeals of the assessee. 6. None appeared on behalf

DIRECTOR OF PHYSICAL PLANT O.U.A.T,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT(CPC-TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, appeals of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 9/CTK/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack14 Oct 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.05 To 11/Ctk/2020 (Ay:2010-2011)(4Th Quarter) 26Q (Ay:2011-2012)(4Th Quarter) 26Q (Ay:2012-2013)(4Th Quarter) 26Q (Ay:2013-2014)(4Th Quarter) 26Q (Ay:2014-2015) (2Nd Quarter)26Q (Ay:2014-2015)(3Rd Quarter) 26Q (Ay:2017-2018) (4Th Quarter)26Q Director Of Physical Plant, Ouat Vs. Acit(Cpc-Tds), Ghaziabad Siripur, Bhubaneswar District : Khurda Tan No. : Bbnd 00486 D (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधाारिती की ओर से /Assessee By : None िाजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Subhendu Dutta, Dr सुनवाई की तािीख / Date Of Hearing : 14/10/2020 घोषणा की तािीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 16/10/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench: The Assessee Has Filed These Seven Appeals Against The Order Of Cit(A)-1, Bhubaneswar, Dated 22.10.2019 & 16.10.2019 For The A.Ys. 2010-2011, 2011-2012, 2012-2013, 2013-2014, 2014-2015 & 2017- 2018, Respectively 2. None Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Even The Case Was Called For Second Round Of Hearing. Applications Dated 14.10.2020 Have Been 2

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Subhendu Dutta, DR
Section 154Section 200ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 220(2)Section 234E

220(2) of the Act. Further, the ACIT(TDS-CPC) has also levied late fee u/s.234E of the Act for Quarter-2nd & 3rd (AY: 2014- 2015). Aggrieved thereby, the assessee preferred appeal before the CIT(A) and the CIT(A) upheld the action of ACIT(TDS-CPC) and dismissed the appeals of the assessee. 6. None appeared on behalf

ARSS INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS LTD.,BHUBANESWAR vs. DCIT, CORPORATION CIRCLE- 1(1), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 109/CTK/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack21 Jan 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Laxmi Prasad Sahuassessment Year : 2012-2013

For Appellant: Shri P.S.Panda/Kamal Agarwal, ARFor Respondent: Shri M.K.Gautam, CIT DR
Section 40Section 43B

220 5. PNB (Loan on BG) 64,76,313 6. PNB (loan for LC) 5,82,026 7. ICICI Bank Ltd(Loan on BG) 13,53,876 Total: 202,54,656 5. Before the AO, since the assessee could not explain the reasons for non-deposit before due date of filing the return of income, the Assessing Officer disallowed

KALPANA MISHRA,BHUBANESWAR vs. ITO, WARD 5(4), BHUBANESWAR, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 491/CTK/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack28 Jan 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Manish Agarwalआयकर अपील संसंसंसं/Ita No.491/Ctk/2024 (िनधा"रण िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Year : 2016-2017) वष" Kalpana Mishra, Vs Ito Ward-5(4), Bhubaneswar Plot No.B-87/A, Chandaka Industrial Estate, Patia, Bhubaneswar-751024 Pan No. :Alfpm 2864 E (अपीलाथ" अपीलाथ" अपीलाथ" /Appellant) अपीलाथ" (""यथ" ""यथ" ""यथ" / Respondent) ""यथ" .. िनधा"रती िनधा"रती क" िनधा"रती िनधा"रती क" क" ओर क" ओर ओर सेसेसेसे /Assessee By ओर : Shri B.R.Pattnaik, Ca राज"व राज"व क" राज"व राज"व क" क" ओर क" ओर ओर सेसेसेसे /Revenue By ओर : Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr. Dr सुनवाई क" तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 28/01/2025 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 28/01/2025 आदेश आदेश / O R D E R आदेश आदेश Per Bench : This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 07.03.2024, Passed By The Cit(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi In Din & Order No.Itba/Nfac/S/250/2023- 24/1062168195(1) For The Assessment Year 2016-2017, On The Following Grounds :- 1. Hon'Ble Cit(Appeals), Nfac Has Erred In Law & On Facts In Confirming The Action Of The Learned Ao Even Though The Learned Ao Has Exceeded His Jurisdiction In A Limited Scrutiny Case Selected Under Cass Only To Examine Whether The Investment & Income Relating To Securities Transactions Are Duly Disclosed Or Not & Added A Sum Of Rs.44,00,000.00 U/S 68 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961, Without Obtaining Prior Administrative Approval Of The Concerned Pr. Cit/Cit As Prescribed In Circular F. No. 225/402/2018/Ita.Ii, Dated 28- 11-2018 & Instruction No.5/2016 [F.No.225/269/2015-

Section 68

TDS and Name and address of Principal Tax deductors, if any. 3.1.29. The appellant, vide 5th 142(1) notice dated 23.10.2018, was asked for the 1 time to explain the source of investment in Kotak Securities, and this point was reiterated in all the subsequent 142(1) notices. 3.1.30. At the cost of repetition, it must be mentioned here that

KANCHAN PLASTICS PRIVATE LIMITED,CUTTACK vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ASMNT CIRCLE-2(1), CUTTACK

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 198/CTK/2022[2017-18]Status: HeardITAT Cuttack22 Mar 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Before S/Shri George Mathan, Judicial & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpiaassessment Year : 2017-18 Kanchan Plastics Pvt Ltd., Kanchan Plastics Pvt Ltd., Vs. Dcit, Asmnt Circle Dcit, Asmnt Circle-2(1), 222, Banka Bazar, Cuttack 222, Banka Bazar, Cuttack Cuttack Pan/Gir No. Pan/Gir No. (Appellant (Appellant) .. ( Respondent Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Mohit Sheth, Ar Mohit Sheth, Ar Revenue By : Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr. S.C.Mohanty, Sr. Dr

For Appellant: Shri Mohit Sheth, ARFor Respondent: Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr
Section 133(6)Section 68

TDS on the interest payments and the lenders had also disclosed the same in their returns of income for the assessment year 2021-22 onwards. Ld AR also placed before us the copies of the bank accounts, returns of income, computation of total income, balance sheet of the loan creditors as also their ledger accounts for the assessment year

ITO, KHURDA vs. BULARAM DALAI, KHURDA

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 294/CTK/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack28 Aug 2018AY 2009-10
For Appellant: Shri B.R.Panda/Bhimsen Sahoo, ARFor Respondent: Shri Subhendu Dutta, DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 147Section 148Section 80C

2 LTD. [1999] 237 ITR 13 (SC), the Ld. CIT(A) was not correct in cancelling the reassessment proceeding for the assessment year 2009-10 which was initiated by the A.O on the basis of Revenue Audit Party's objection. 4. Any other grounds, if any, shall be pressed at the time of hearing. 3. Brief facts of the case