BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “TDS”+ Section 205clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai293Delhi250Bangalore156Karnataka105Hyderabad73Chennai58Ahmedabad57Kolkata52Jaipur43Raipur37Pune22Chandigarh19Indore11Guwahati11Surat11Lucknow9Rajkot8Patna7Visakhapatnam5Cochin5Telangana5Amritsar4Varanasi4SC4Agra3Cuttack3Nagpur2Ranchi2Jodhpur1Punjab & Haryana1Allahabad1Jabalpur1Panaji1Calcutta1

Key Topics

Section 2637Section 143(3)4Addition to Income3Section 402Section 145(3)2Section 1442Disallowance2TDS2

BAISHNAB CHARAN NAYAK,JAGATSINGHPUR vs. ACIT, CUTTACK

ITA 171/CTK/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack29 May 2017AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri N.S. Saini & Shri Kuldip Singhbaishnab Charan Nayak, Vs. Acit, Circle 1 (1), Hig – 38, Gourav Vihar, Cuttack. Paradeep.

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Mishra, ARFor Respondent: Shri A. Tigga, DR
Section 142Section 143(3)Section 144Section 205Section 44A

TDS Certificate, thereby violated the Provision of Section 205 of the Income Tax Act. Hence the credit of entire TDS

KISHAN MOTORS,BHUBANESWAR vs. ITO, WARD-4(3), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeal in ITA No

ITA 169/CTK/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack24 Jan 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri S.K.Agarwal, ARFor Respondent: Shri J.K.Lenka, DR
Section 143(3)Section 40Section 43B

205 CTR 444 (All) for this proposition. 7. Replying to above, ld D.R. supported the order of the ld CIT(A). 8. On careful consideration of the rival submissions, first of all, we may point out that the ld CIT(A) did not accept the evidence filed by the assessee. But, on perusal of confirmations of the creditors placed

KAMLESH KUMAR JAIN,JAJPUR vs. CIT, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 265/CTK/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack22 Sept 2017AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri N.S.Saini, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.265/Ctk/2015 (धनधाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2010-2011) Sri Kamlesh Kumar Jain, Vs. Cit, Cuttack C/O-Jain Transport, Chandikhole, At-Sunguda, Jajpur स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aejpj 7987 H (अपीलाथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) निर्ााररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri R.K.Jhunjhunwala, Ar राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri A.K.Mohapatra, Citdr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 19/09/2017 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement 22/09/2017 आदेश / O R D E R Per Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm: The Assessee Has Filed An Appeal Against The Order Of Cit, Cuttack, Dated 31.03.2015, Passed U/S.263 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 For The Assessment Year 2009-2010, Wherein The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds :- 1. For That The Learned Cit Has Erred Both In Law & Fact In Invoking The Provisions Of Section 263 Without Satisfying The Requirement Of Law. 2. For That, The Learned Cit Is Wrong & Unlawful In Passing An Order Under Section 263 For Having Disagreement With The Opinion Of Ao, Which Is Not Unlawful. 3. For That The Learned Cit Has Erred Both In Law & Fact By Holding That Exercise Of Power Under Section 263 Is Justified Even In Case Of In Adequate Inquiry By Ao. 4. For That The Learned Cit (Appeal) Has Erred Both In Law & Fact By Passing Order By Exercising Power Under Section 263 Without Having Any Cogent Material On Hand. 5. The Assessee Craves The Leave Of This Honorable Bench To Add, Alter, Modify, Substitute Anv Of The Above Grounds Or Submit Any Fresh Additional Grounds During Appeal Proceeding.

For Appellant: Shri R.K.Jhunjhunwala, ARFor Respondent: Shri A.K.Mohapatra, CITDR
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 263

section 263 without having any cogent material on hand. 5. The assessee craves the leave of this Honorable bench to add, alter, modify, substitute anv of the above grounds or submit any fresh additional grounds during appeal proceeding. 2 2. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is engaged in the business of transportation and construction activities