BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

12 results for “TDS”+ Section 200A(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Pune651Chennai565Patna466Bangalore396Delhi350Cochin303Mumbai212Indore152Nagpur55Visakhapatnam49Dehradun43Kolkata40Hyderabad31Karnataka27Raipur20Surat20Jaipur18Lucknow13Cuttack12Panaji11Amritsar10Rajkot6Guwahati6Agra5Chandigarh4Ahmedabad3Jodhpur3Ranchi2Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 234E57Section 200A30TDS12Section 155Section 200(3)2

INCOME TAX OFFICER, CUTTACK vs. MAA TARINI TRANSPORT PRIVATE LIMITED, BARBIL KOENJHAR

In the result, appeals of the revenue stand dismissed

ITA 454/CTK/2024[2014-15]Status: HeardITAT Cuttack07 Jan 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Before Shri George Mathanmember & Manish Agarwal Manish Agarwalita Nos.454 & 455/Ctk/2024 Assessment Year : 2014-15 Income Tax Officer (Tds), Income Tax Officer (Tds), Vs. Maa Tarini Transport Pvt Maa Tarini Transport Pvt Cuttack Ltd., Ltd., Bhadrasahi, Bhadrasahi, Barbil, Barbil, Keonjhar Pan/Gir No.Aafcm 0416 L No.Aafcm 0416 L (Appellant (Appellant) .. ( Respondent Respondent) Assessee By : None Revenue By : Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr Dr : Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr Dr Date Of Hearing : 07/01/20 2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 07/01/20 025 O R D E R Per Bench These Two These Two Appeals Filed By The Revenue Against The Against The Separate Orders Of The Ld Cit(A), Nfac, Delhi Dated Of The Ld Cit(A), Nfac, Delhi Dated 10.9.2024 In Appeal No.Cit(A),Cuttack/10412/2018 Cit(A),Cuttack/10412/2018-19 & Cit(A),Cuttack/10413/2018 19 & Cit(A),Cuttack/10413/2018-19 For The Assessment Year Essment Year 2014-15 Deleting The Levy Of Fees U/S.234E Of The Act. Deleting The Levy Of Fees U/S.234E Of The Act.

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr DR
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234E

TDS return pertaining to the period prior to 01-06-2015 was upheld. 6. We have considered the submissions of ld Sr DR. We find that the ld CIT(A) while deleting the levy of fees has observed as under: “The Finance Act 2015, with effect from 1.6.2015, amended Section 200A sub-section(1

INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), CUTTACK vs. MAA TARINI TRANSPORT PRIVATE LIMITED, BARBIL, KEONJHAR

In the result, appeals of the revenue stand dismissed

ITA 455/CTK/2024[2014-15]Status: HeardITAT Cuttack07 Jan 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Before Shri George Mathanmember & Manish Agarwal Manish Agarwalita Nos.454 & 455/Ctk/2024 Assessment Year : 2014-15 Income Tax Officer (Tds), Income Tax Officer (Tds), Vs. Maa Tarini Transport Pvt Maa Tarini Transport Pvt Cuttack Ltd., Ltd., Bhadrasahi, Bhadrasahi, Barbil, Barbil, Keonjhar Pan/Gir No.Aafcm 0416 L No.Aafcm 0416 L (Appellant (Appellant) .. ( Respondent Respondent) Assessee By : None Revenue By : Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr Dr : Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr Dr Date Of Hearing : 07/01/20 2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 07/01/20 025 O R D E R Per Bench These Two These Two Appeals Filed By The Revenue Against The Against The Separate Orders Of The Ld Cit(A), Nfac, Delhi Dated Of The Ld Cit(A), Nfac, Delhi Dated 10.9.2024 In Appeal No.Cit(A),Cuttack/10412/2018 Cit(A),Cuttack/10412/2018-19 & Cit(A),Cuttack/10413/2018 19 & Cit(A),Cuttack/10413/2018-19 For The Assessment Year Essment Year 2014-15 Deleting The Levy Of Fees U/S.234E Of The Act. Deleting The Levy Of Fees U/S.234E Of The Act.

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr DR
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234E

TDS return pertaining to the period prior to 01-06-2015 was upheld. 6. We have considered the submissions of ld Sr DR. We find that the ld CIT(A) while deleting the levy of fees has observed as under: “The Finance Act 2015, with effect from 1.6.2015, amended Section 200A sub-section(1

ITO(TDS), SAMBALPUR vs. ASST DIST MEDICAL OFFICER MEDI-CUM-SDMO, NUAPADA

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 471/CTK/2024[2013]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack27 Nov 2024

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Manish Agarwalआयकर अपील संसंसंसं/Ita No.467 & 469-474/Ctk/2024 (िनधा"रण िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Years : 2013-2014 & 2014-2015) वष" Ito (Tds), Sambalpur Vs Asst. District Medical Officer, Medi-Cum-Sdmo, Ainthapali, Sambalpur-768004 Tan No. : Bbna 01361 D (अपीलाथ" अपीलाथ" अपीलाथ" /Appellant) अपीलाथ" (""यथ" ""यथ" ""यथ" / Respondent) ""यथ" .. राज"व क" राज"व क" ओर ओर सेसेसेसे /Revenue By राज"व राज"व क" क" ओर ओर : Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr. Dr िनधा"रती िनधा"रती क" िनधा"रती िनधा"रती क" क" ओर क" ओर ओर सेसेसेसे /Assessee By ओर : None सुनवाई क" तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 27/11/2024 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 27/11/2024

Section 200ASection 234E

200A of the Act, when the empowering section came into effect only w.e.f. 1.6.2015. Thus, the enabling provision came into effect only w.e.f. 1.6.2015, obviously, 234E would be leviable only from the time the enabling section came into effect. This being so, as also after noticing that the ld CIT(A) has followed the decision of the Co- ordinate Bench

ITO(TDS), SAMBALPUR vs. ASST DIST MEDICAL OFFICER MEDI-CUM-SDMO, NUAPADA

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 472/CTK/2024[2013]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack27 Nov 2024

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Manish Agarwalआयकर अपील संसंसंसं/Ita No.467 & 469-474/Ctk/2024 (िनधा"रण िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Years : 2013-2014 & 2014-2015) वष" Ito (Tds), Sambalpur Vs Asst. District Medical Officer, Medi-Cum-Sdmo, Ainthapali, Sambalpur-768004 Tan No. : Bbna 01361 D (अपीलाथ" अपीलाथ" अपीलाथ" /Appellant) अपीलाथ" (""यथ" ""यथ" ""यथ" / Respondent) ""यथ" .. राज"व क" राज"व क" ओर ओर सेसेसेसे /Revenue By राज"व राज"व क" क" ओर ओर : Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr. Dr िनधा"रती िनधा"रती क" िनधा"रती िनधा"रती क" क" ओर क" ओर ओर सेसेसेसे /Assessee By ओर : None सुनवाई क" तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 27/11/2024 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 27/11/2024

Section 200ASection 234E

200A of the Act, when the empowering section came into effect only w.e.f. 1.6.2015. Thus, the enabling provision came into effect only w.e.f. 1.6.2015, obviously, 234E would be leviable only from the time the enabling section came into effect. This being so, as also after noticing that the ld CIT(A) has followed the decision of the Co- ordinate Bench

ITO(TDS) SAMBALPUR, SAMBALPUR vs. ASST DIST MEDICAL OFFICER MEDI-CUM-SDMO, NUAPADA

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 473/CTK/2024[2014]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack27 Nov 2024

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Manish Agarwalआयकर अपील संसंसंसं/Ita No.467 & 469-474/Ctk/2024 (िनधा"रण िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Years : 2013-2014 & 2014-2015) वष" Ito (Tds), Sambalpur Vs Asst. District Medical Officer, Medi-Cum-Sdmo, Ainthapali, Sambalpur-768004 Tan No. : Bbna 01361 D (अपीलाथ" अपीलाथ" अपीलाथ" /Appellant) अपीलाथ" (""यथ" ""यथ" ""यथ" / Respondent) ""यथ" .. राज"व क" राज"व क" ओर ओर सेसेसेसे /Revenue By राज"व राज"व क" क" ओर ओर : Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr. Dr िनधा"रती िनधा"रती क" िनधा"रती िनधा"रती क" क" ओर क" ओर ओर सेसेसेसे /Assessee By ओर : None सुनवाई क" तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 27/11/2024 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 27/11/2024

Section 200ASection 234E

200A of the Act, when the empowering section came into effect only w.e.f. 1.6.2015. Thus, the enabling provision came into effect only w.e.f. 1.6.2015, obviously, 234E would be leviable only from the time the enabling section came into effect. This being so, as also after noticing that the ld CIT(A) has followed the decision of the Co- ordinate Bench

ITO(TDS) SAMBALPUR, SAMBALPUR vs. ASST DIST MEDICAL OFFICER MEDI-CUM-SDMO, NUAPADA

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 474/CTK/2024[2014]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack27 Nov 2024

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Manish Agarwalआयकर अपील संसंसंसं/Ita No.467 & 469-474/Ctk/2024 (िनधा"रण िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Years : 2013-2014 & 2014-2015) वष" Ito (Tds), Sambalpur Vs Asst. District Medical Officer, Medi-Cum-Sdmo, Ainthapali, Sambalpur-768004 Tan No. : Bbna 01361 D (अपीलाथ" अपीलाथ" अपीलाथ" /Appellant) अपीलाथ" (""यथ" ""यथ" ""यथ" / Respondent) ""यथ" .. राज"व क" राज"व क" ओर ओर सेसेसेसे /Revenue By राज"व राज"व क" क" ओर ओर : Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr. Dr िनधा"रती िनधा"रती क" िनधा"रती िनधा"रती क" क" ओर क" ओर ओर सेसेसेसे /Assessee By ओर : None सुनवाई क" तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 27/11/2024 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 27/11/2024

Section 200ASection 234E

200A of the Act, when the empowering section came into effect only w.e.f. 1.6.2015. Thus, the enabling provision came into effect only w.e.f. 1.6.2015, obviously, 234E would be leviable only from the time the enabling section came into effect. This being so, as also after noticing that the ld CIT(A) has followed the decision of the Co- ordinate Bench

ITO(TDS), SAMBALPUR, SAMBALPUR vs. ASST DIST MEDICAL OFFICER MEDI-CUM-SDMO, NUAPADA

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 469/CTK/2024[2013]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack27 Nov 2024

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Manish Agarwalआयकर अपील संसंसंसं/Ita No.467 & 469-474/Ctk/2024 (िनधा"रण िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Years : 2013-2014 & 2014-2015) वष" Ito (Tds), Sambalpur Vs Asst. District Medical Officer, Medi-Cum-Sdmo, Ainthapali, Sambalpur-768004 Tan No. : Bbna 01361 D (अपीलाथ" अपीलाथ" अपीलाथ" /Appellant) अपीलाथ" (""यथ" ""यथ" ""यथ" / Respondent) ""यथ" .. राज"व क" राज"व क" ओर ओर सेसेसेसे /Revenue By राज"व राज"व क" क" ओर ओर : Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr. Dr िनधा"रती िनधा"रती क" िनधा"रती िनधा"रती क" क" ओर क" ओर ओर सेसेसेसे /Assessee By ओर : None सुनवाई क" तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 27/11/2024 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 27/11/2024

Section 200ASection 234E

200A of the Act, when the empowering section came into effect only w.e.f. 1.6.2015. Thus, the enabling provision came into effect only w.e.f. 1.6.2015, obviously, 234E would be leviable only from the time the enabling section came into effect. This being so, as also after noticing that the ld CIT(A) has followed the decision of the Co- ordinate Bench

INCOME TAX OFFICER(TDS), CUTTACK vs. DIRECTORATE OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY VETY SERVICES, CUTTACK

In the result, appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 424/CTK/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack29 Oct 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Before Shri George Mathanmember & Manish Agarwal Manish Agarwalita Nos.420 To 422/Ctk/2024 Assessment Year : 2013-14

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr DR
Section 15Section 200ASection 234E

200A of the Act, when the empowering section came into effect only w.e.f. 1.6.2015. Thus, the enabling provision came into effect only w.e.f. 1.6.2015, obviously, 234E would be leviable only from the time the enabling section came into effect. This being so, as also after noticing that the ld CIT(A) has followed the decision of the Co- ordinate Bench

INCOME TAX OFFICER(TDS), CUTTACK vs. DIRECTORATE OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND VETY SERVICES, CUTTACK

In the result, appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 420/CTK/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack29 Oct 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Before Shri George Mathanmember & Manish Agarwal Manish Agarwalita Nos.420 To 422/Ctk/2024 Assessment Year : 2013-14

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr DR
Section 15Section 200ASection 234E

200A of the Act, when the empowering section came into effect only w.e.f. 1.6.2015. Thus, the enabling provision came into effect only w.e.f. 1.6.2015, obviously, 234E would be leviable only from the time the enabling section came into effect. This being so, as also after noticing that the ld CIT(A) has followed the decision of the Co- ordinate Bench

INCOME TAX OFFICER(TDS), CUTTACK vs. DIRECTORATE OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND VETY SERVICES, CUTTACK

In the result, appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 421/CTK/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack29 Oct 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Before Shri George Mathanmember & Manish Agarwal Manish Agarwalita Nos.420 To 422/Ctk/2024 Assessment Year : 2013-14

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr DR
Section 15Section 200ASection 234E

200A of the Act, when the empowering section came into effect only w.e.f. 1.6.2015. Thus, the enabling provision came into effect only w.e.f. 1.6.2015, obviously, 234E would be leviable only from the time the enabling section came into effect. This being so, as also after noticing that the ld CIT(A) has followed the decision of the Co- ordinate Bench

INCOME TAX OFFICER(TDS) CUTTACK, CUTTACK vs. DIRECTORATE OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND VETY SERVICES, CUTTACK

In the result, appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 422/CTK/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack29 Oct 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Before Shri George Mathanmember & Manish Agarwal Manish Agarwalita Nos.420 To 422/Ctk/2024 Assessment Year : 2013-14

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr DR
Section 15Section 200ASection 234E

200A of the Act, when the empowering section came into effect only w.e.f. 1.6.2015. Thus, the enabling provision came into effect only w.e.f. 1.6.2015, obviously, 234E would be leviable only from the time the enabling section came into effect. This being so, as also after noticing that the ld CIT(A) has followed the decision of the Co- ordinate Bench

INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), CUTTACK vs. DIRECTORATE OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY VETY SERVICES, CUTTACK

In the result, appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 423/CTK/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack29 Oct 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Before Shri George Mathanmember & Manish Agarwal Manish Agarwalita Nos.420 To 422/Ctk/2024 Assessment Year : 2013-14

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr DR
Section 15Section 200ASection 234E

200A of the Act, when the empowering section came into effect only w.e.f. 1.6.2015. Thus, the enabling provision came into effect only w.e.f. 1.6.2015, obviously, 234E would be leviable only from the time the enabling section came into effect. This being so, as also after noticing that the ld CIT(A) has followed the decision of the Co- ordinate Bench