BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

73 results for “TDS”+ Section 200clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi907Mumbai889Bangalore798Pune587Patna476Indore447Chennai435Hyderabad202Ahmedabad176Kolkata176Jaipur155Raipur154Cochin148Karnataka139Nagpur121Chandigarh94Cuttack73Visakhapatnam51Rajkot51Lucknow40Surat39Agra35Dehradun35Amritsar33Jabalpur31Allahabad28Jodhpur23Ranchi21Panaji17Guwahati15SC5Varanasi5Telangana2Calcutta1Orissa1

Key Topics

Section 234E220Section 200A123Section 20153TDS48Section 4043Deduction34Disallowance27Section 23426Addition to Income24Section 220(2)

M/S. BALASORE CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD.,BALASORE vs. ACIT, BALASORE CIRCLE, BALASORE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 467/CTK/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack07 Oct 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.467/Ctk/2017 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2012-2013) M/S Balasore Cooperative Bank Vs. Acit, Balasore Circle, Limited, Balasore Bibekananda Marg, Balasore-756001 Pan No. : Aaccb 7823 M (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधााररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri S.N.Sahu/Somnath Sahoo,Advs राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri M.K.Gautam, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 13/08/2020 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 12/10/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per L.P.Sahu, Am: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Passed By The Cit(A), Cuttack, Dated 04.08.2017, For The Assessment Year 2012-2013, On The Following Grounds Of Appeal :- 1) That The Order Of The Id. Cit(Appeals) Confirming The Additions & Disallowances Made By The A.O. Is Illegal, Arbitrary, Unjustified & Not In Accordance With Law. 2) That The Addition Of Rs. 36,79,148/- U/S. 40(A)(Ia) Of The I.T. Act, 1961 Confirmed By Cit(Appeals) To The Extent Of Rs. 36,30,998/- Is Illegal, Arbitrary, Uncalled For & Not In Accordance With Law & The Same Should Have Been Deleted By The Learned Cit(Appeals). 3) That The Disallowance U/S 40(A)(Ia) Of Rs. 36,79,148/- As Detailed Below Is Illegal, Arbitrary & Unjustified & Hence Should Have Been Deleted By The Learned Cit(A) As The Genuineness Is Not In Doubt. Non-Deduction Of Tds Is A Separate Issue. A) Commission Payment To Dlds Collection Agents Rs. 33,45,248/- B) Legal Expenses Rs. 2,52,000/- C) Audit Fees Rs. 81,900/-

For Appellant: Shri S.N.Sahu/Somnath Sahoo,AdvsFor Respondent: Shri M.K.Gautam, CIT-DR
Section 36

Showing 1–20 of 73 · Page 1 of 4

14
Section 201(1)11
Section 19411
Section 40
Section 43B

TDS requirement, tax has been deducted in any subsequent year, or has been deducted during the previous year but paid in any subsequent year after the expiry of the time prescribed in Section 200

DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1), BHUBANESWAR, BHUBANESWAR vs. M/S. PARADEEP PHOSPHATES LIMITED, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed and that of

ITA 289/CTK/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack04 Aug 2017AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri N.S Saini & Pavan Kumar Gadaleassessment Year : 2010-2011

For Appellant: Shri B.K.MohapatraFor Respondent: Shri Kunal Singh, CIT DR
Section 195Section 195(1)Section 195(2)Section 197Section 263Section 40Section 92

200, read with rule 30 of the Income-tax Rules, 1962. Failure to deduct tax or to pay tax would also render a person liable to penalty under section 201, read with section 221. In addition, he would also be liable under section 201(1 A) to pay simple interest at 12 per cent ~ per annum on the amount

LATEST GENERATION ENTERTAINMENT PVT. LTD.,CUTTACK vs. DCIT, CPC-TDS,

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 150/CTK/2016[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack28 Aug 2017AY 2013-14

Bench: S/Shri N.S Saini & Pavan Kumar Gadale

For Appellant: Shri P.K.Mishra, ARFor Respondent: Shri D.K.Pradhan, DR
Section 200Section 200ASection 234Section 234E

TDS return. It is a fact that section 234 E was made a part of amended section 200 A w.e.f

GLEE PHARMA PVT. LTD.,CUTTACK vs. DCIT(TDS)(CPC), GHAZIABAD,

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 161/CTK/2016[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack28 Aug 2017AY 2013-14

Bench: S/Shri N.S Saini & Pavan Kumar Gadale

For Appellant: Shri P.R.Mohanty, ARFor Respondent: Shri D.K.Pradhan, DR
Section 194Section 200Section 200ASection 234Section 234E

TDS return. It is a fact that section 234 E was made a part of amended section 200 A w.e.f

TB AND ID HOSPITAL,PURI vs. ITO-TDS(1), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the assessee i

ITA 325/CTK/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack27 Aug 2018AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N.S.Saini, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.323 To 332/Ctk/2018 Ay: 2013-2014(Quarter-4) Ay: 2014-2015 (Quarter-1, 2, 3 & 4) Ay: 2015-2016 (Quarter-1, 2, 3 & 4) Ay: 2016-2017 (Quarter-1) Tb & Id Hospital, Vs. Ito-Tds(1), Bhubaneswar At/Po/Dist-Puri-752002 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Bbnti 0335 G (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) .. "नधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee By : Shri P.R.Mohanty/D.S.Jethi, Ar राज"व क" ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Subhendu Dutta, Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 27/08/2018 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement 27/08/2018 आदेश / O R D E R Per Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm: These Are The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Cit(A)-1, Bhubaneswar, All Dated 25.06.2018 Passed In I.T.Appeal No.0134, 0135, 0136 & 0137/17-18 For The Assessment Year 2013-2014, 2014-2015, 2015-2016 & 2016-2017. 2. The Common Grievance Of The Assessee In All The Appeals Is That The Cit(A) Has Erred In Dismissing The Assessee’S Appeal In Respect Of Levy Of Late Fee U/S.234E Of The Act. 3. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That In All The Above Appeals Under Consideration, Admittedly There Was A Delay In Filing Of Tds Statement & During The Processing Of Tds Return, The Ao(Tds) Raised Demand By Way Of Intimations Issued U/S.200A Of The Act For Levy Of Fees U/S.234E For 2

For Appellant: Shri P.R.Mohanty/D.S.Jethi, ARFor Respondent: Shri Subhendu Dutta, DR
Section 200ASection 234Section 234E

TDS deducted for the respective assessment year prior to 1.6.2015. Hence, the demand notices under Section 200A by the respondent- authority for intimation for payment of fee under Section 234E can be said as without any authority of law and the same are quashed and set aside to that extent.” 8. We take note that the facts of the aforesaid

TB AND ID HOSPITAL,PURI vs. ITO-TDS(1), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the assessee i

ITA 326/CTK/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack27 Aug 2018AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N.S.Saini, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.323 To 332/Ctk/2018 Ay: 2013-2014(Quarter-4) Ay: 2014-2015 (Quarter-1, 2, 3 & 4) Ay: 2015-2016 (Quarter-1, 2, 3 & 4) Ay: 2016-2017 (Quarter-1) Tb & Id Hospital, Vs. Ito-Tds(1), Bhubaneswar At/Po/Dist-Puri-752002 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Bbnti 0335 G (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) .. "नधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee By : Shri P.R.Mohanty/D.S.Jethi, Ar राज"व क" ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Subhendu Dutta, Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 27/08/2018 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement 27/08/2018 आदेश / O R D E R Per Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm: These Are The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Cit(A)-1, Bhubaneswar, All Dated 25.06.2018 Passed In I.T.Appeal No.0134, 0135, 0136 & 0137/17-18 For The Assessment Year 2013-2014, 2014-2015, 2015-2016 & 2016-2017. 2. The Common Grievance Of The Assessee In All The Appeals Is That The Cit(A) Has Erred In Dismissing The Assessee’S Appeal In Respect Of Levy Of Late Fee U/S.234E Of The Act. 3. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That In All The Above Appeals Under Consideration, Admittedly There Was A Delay In Filing Of Tds Statement & During The Processing Of Tds Return, The Ao(Tds) Raised Demand By Way Of Intimations Issued U/S.200A Of The Act For Levy Of Fees U/S.234E For 2

For Appellant: Shri P.R.Mohanty/D.S.Jethi, ARFor Respondent: Shri Subhendu Dutta, DR
Section 200ASection 234Section 234E

TDS deducted for the respective assessment year prior to 1.6.2015. Hence, the demand notices under Section 200A by the respondent- authority for intimation for payment of fee under Section 234E can be said as without any authority of law and the same are quashed and set aside to that extent.” 8. We take note that the facts of the aforesaid

TB AND ID HOSPITAL,PURI vs. ITO-TDS(1), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the assessee i

ITA 323/CTK/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack27 Aug 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N.S.Saini, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.323 To 332/Ctk/2018 Ay: 2013-2014(Quarter-4) Ay: 2014-2015 (Quarter-1, 2, 3 & 4) Ay: 2015-2016 (Quarter-1, 2, 3 & 4) Ay: 2016-2017 (Quarter-1) Tb & Id Hospital, Vs. Ito-Tds(1), Bhubaneswar At/Po/Dist-Puri-752002 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Bbnti 0335 G (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) .. "नधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee By : Shri P.R.Mohanty/D.S.Jethi, Ar राज"व क" ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Subhendu Dutta, Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 27/08/2018 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement 27/08/2018 आदेश / O R D E R Per Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm: These Are The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Cit(A)-1, Bhubaneswar, All Dated 25.06.2018 Passed In I.T.Appeal No.0134, 0135, 0136 & 0137/17-18 For The Assessment Year 2013-2014, 2014-2015, 2015-2016 & 2016-2017. 2. The Common Grievance Of The Assessee In All The Appeals Is That The Cit(A) Has Erred In Dismissing The Assessee’S Appeal In Respect Of Levy Of Late Fee U/S.234E Of The Act. 3. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That In All The Above Appeals Under Consideration, Admittedly There Was A Delay In Filing Of Tds Statement & During The Processing Of Tds Return, The Ao(Tds) Raised Demand By Way Of Intimations Issued U/S.200A Of The Act For Levy Of Fees U/S.234E For 2

For Appellant: Shri P.R.Mohanty/D.S.Jethi, ARFor Respondent: Shri Subhendu Dutta, DR
Section 200ASection 234Section 234E

TDS deducted for the respective assessment year prior to 1.6.2015. Hence, the demand notices under Section 200A by the respondent- authority for intimation for payment of fee under Section 234E can be said as without any authority of law and the same are quashed and set aside to that extent.” 8. We take note that the facts of the aforesaid

TB AND ID HOSPITAL,PURI vs. ITO-TDS(1), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the assessee i

ITA 324/CTK/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack27 Aug 2018AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N.S.Saini, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.323 To 332/Ctk/2018 Ay: 2013-2014(Quarter-4) Ay: 2014-2015 (Quarter-1, 2, 3 & 4) Ay: 2015-2016 (Quarter-1, 2, 3 & 4) Ay: 2016-2017 (Quarter-1) Tb & Id Hospital, Vs. Ito-Tds(1), Bhubaneswar At/Po/Dist-Puri-752002 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Bbnti 0335 G (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) .. "नधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee By : Shri P.R.Mohanty/D.S.Jethi, Ar राज"व क" ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Subhendu Dutta, Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 27/08/2018 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement 27/08/2018 आदेश / O R D E R Per Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm: These Are The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Cit(A)-1, Bhubaneswar, All Dated 25.06.2018 Passed In I.T.Appeal No.0134, 0135, 0136 & 0137/17-18 For The Assessment Year 2013-2014, 2014-2015, 2015-2016 & 2016-2017. 2. The Common Grievance Of The Assessee In All The Appeals Is That The Cit(A) Has Erred In Dismissing The Assessee’S Appeal In Respect Of Levy Of Late Fee U/S.234E Of The Act. 3. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That In All The Above Appeals Under Consideration, Admittedly There Was A Delay In Filing Of Tds Statement & During The Processing Of Tds Return, The Ao(Tds) Raised Demand By Way Of Intimations Issued U/S.200A Of The Act For Levy Of Fees U/S.234E For 2

For Appellant: Shri P.R.Mohanty/D.S.Jethi, ARFor Respondent: Shri Subhendu Dutta, DR
Section 200ASection 234Section 234E

TDS deducted for the respective assessment year prior to 1.6.2015. Hence, the demand notices under Section 200A by the respondent- authority for intimation for payment of fee under Section 234E can be said as without any authority of law and the same are quashed and set aside to that extent.” 8. We take note that the facts of the aforesaid

TB AND ID HOSPITAL,PURI vs. ITO-TDS(1), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the assessee i

ITA 327/CTK/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack27 Aug 2018AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N.S.Saini, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.323 To 332/Ctk/2018 Ay: 2013-2014(Quarter-4) Ay: 2014-2015 (Quarter-1, 2, 3 & 4) Ay: 2015-2016 (Quarter-1, 2, 3 & 4) Ay: 2016-2017 (Quarter-1) Tb & Id Hospital, Vs. Ito-Tds(1), Bhubaneswar At/Po/Dist-Puri-752002 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Bbnti 0335 G (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) .. "नधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee By : Shri P.R.Mohanty/D.S.Jethi, Ar राज"व क" ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Subhendu Dutta, Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 27/08/2018 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement 27/08/2018 आदेश / O R D E R Per Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm: These Are The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Cit(A)-1, Bhubaneswar, All Dated 25.06.2018 Passed In I.T.Appeal No.0134, 0135, 0136 & 0137/17-18 For The Assessment Year 2013-2014, 2014-2015, 2015-2016 & 2016-2017. 2. The Common Grievance Of The Assessee In All The Appeals Is That The Cit(A) Has Erred In Dismissing The Assessee’S Appeal In Respect Of Levy Of Late Fee U/S.234E Of The Act. 3. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That In All The Above Appeals Under Consideration, Admittedly There Was A Delay In Filing Of Tds Statement & During The Processing Of Tds Return, The Ao(Tds) Raised Demand By Way Of Intimations Issued U/S.200A Of The Act For Levy Of Fees U/S.234E For 2

For Appellant: Shri P.R.Mohanty/D.S.Jethi, ARFor Respondent: Shri Subhendu Dutta, DR
Section 200ASection 234Section 234E

TDS deducted for the respective assessment year prior to 1.6.2015. Hence, the demand notices under Section 200A by the respondent- authority for intimation for payment of fee under Section 234E can be said as without any authority of law and the same are quashed and set aside to that extent.” 8. We take note that the facts of the aforesaid

NATIONAL ALUMINIUM COMPANY LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE-1(2), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee and Revenue along

ITA 338/CTK/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack27 Oct 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.338/Ctk/2017 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.39/Ctk/2019 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.01/Ctk/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2009-2010, 2015-2016 & 2016-2017) National Aluminium Company Limited, Vs. Acit, Corporate Circle-1(2), Bhubaneswar Nalco Bhawan, P/1, Nayapalli, Bhubaneswar Pan No. : Aaacn 7449 M & आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.331/Ctk/2017 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.69/Ctk/2019 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.65/Ctk/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2009-2010, 2015-2016 & 2016-2017) National Aluminium Company Limited, Vs. Dcit/Acit, Nalco Bhawan, P/1, Nayapalli, Corporate Circle-1(2), Bhubaneswar Bhubaneswar Pan No. : Aaacn 7449 M & Cross Objection No.11/Ctk/2019 Cross Objection No.02/Ctk/2020 (Arising Out Of Ita Nos.69/Ctk/2019 & 65/Ctk/2020) (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2015-2016 & 2016-2017) National Aluminium Company Limited, Vs. Dcit/Acit, Nalco Bhavan, P/1, Nayapalli, Corporate Circle-1(2), Bhubaneswar Bhubaneswar Pan No. : Aaacn 7449 M (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधााररती की ओर से /Assessee By Shri A.K.Sabat & B.K.Mahapatra, Cas : राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By Shri M.K.Gautam, Cit Dr : सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 06/10/2020 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 28/10/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : These Are The Cross Appeals Filed By The Assessee & Revenue & Cross Objections By The Assessee, Against The Separate Orders Of The Cit(A)-1, Bhubaneswar, Dated 30.12.2017, 27.12.2018 & 24.10.2019

TDS is deductible either u/s.1941 or U/S.194J. Since tax is not deductible on the payments made as transmission/wheeling charges, no addition u/s.40(a)(ia) can be made. Accordingly; the addition of Rs.2,84,32,895/- u/s.40(a)(ia) is deleted. ITA Nos.39&69/CTK/2019 ITA Nos.01&65/CTK/2020 CO Nos.11/CTK/2019&08/CTK/2020 42. On perusal of the above observations

ACIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE-1(2), BHUBANESWAR vs. NATIONAL ALUMINIUM COMPANY LTD., BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee and Revenue along

ITA 331/CTK/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack27 Oct 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.338/Ctk/2017 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.39/Ctk/2019 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.01/Ctk/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2009-2010, 2015-2016 & 2016-2017) National Aluminium Company Limited, Vs. Acit, Corporate Circle-1(2), Bhubaneswar Nalco Bhawan, P/1, Nayapalli, Bhubaneswar Pan No. : Aaacn 7449 M & आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.331/Ctk/2017 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.69/Ctk/2019 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.65/Ctk/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2009-2010, 2015-2016 & 2016-2017) National Aluminium Company Limited, Vs. Dcit/Acit, Nalco Bhawan, P/1, Nayapalli, Corporate Circle-1(2), Bhubaneswar Bhubaneswar Pan No. : Aaacn 7449 M & Cross Objection No.11/Ctk/2019 Cross Objection No.02/Ctk/2020 (Arising Out Of Ita Nos.69/Ctk/2019 & 65/Ctk/2020) (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2015-2016 & 2016-2017) National Aluminium Company Limited, Vs. Dcit/Acit, Nalco Bhavan, P/1, Nayapalli, Corporate Circle-1(2), Bhubaneswar Bhubaneswar Pan No. : Aaacn 7449 M (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधााररती की ओर से /Assessee By Shri A.K.Sabat & B.K.Mahapatra, Cas : राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By Shri M.K.Gautam, Cit Dr : सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 06/10/2020 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 28/10/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : These Are The Cross Appeals Filed By The Assessee & Revenue & Cross Objections By The Assessee, Against The Separate Orders Of The Cit(A)-1, Bhubaneswar, Dated 30.12.2017, 27.12.2018 & 24.10.2019

TDS is deductible either u/s.1941 or U/S.194J. Since tax is not deductible on the payments made as transmission/wheeling charges, no addition u/s.40(a)(ia) can be made. Accordingly; the addition of Rs.2,84,32,895/- u/s.40(a)(ia) is deleted. ITA Nos.39&69/CTK/2019 ITA Nos.01&65/CTK/2020 CO Nos.11/CTK/2019&08/CTK/2020 42. On perusal of the above observations

DCIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE-1(2), BHUBANESWAR vs. NATIONAL ALUMINIUM COMPANY LIMITED, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee and Revenue along

ITA 69/CTK/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack27 Oct 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.338/Ctk/2017 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.39/Ctk/2019 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.01/Ctk/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2009-2010, 2015-2016 & 2016-2017) National Aluminium Company Limited, Vs. Acit, Corporate Circle-1(2), Bhubaneswar Nalco Bhawan, P/1, Nayapalli, Bhubaneswar Pan No. : Aaacn 7449 M & आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.331/Ctk/2017 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.69/Ctk/2019 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.65/Ctk/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2009-2010, 2015-2016 & 2016-2017) National Aluminium Company Limited, Vs. Dcit/Acit, Nalco Bhawan, P/1, Nayapalli, Corporate Circle-1(2), Bhubaneswar Bhubaneswar Pan No. : Aaacn 7449 M & Cross Objection No.11/Ctk/2019 Cross Objection No.02/Ctk/2020 (Arising Out Of Ita Nos.69/Ctk/2019 & 65/Ctk/2020) (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2015-2016 & 2016-2017) National Aluminium Company Limited, Vs. Dcit/Acit, Nalco Bhavan, P/1, Nayapalli, Corporate Circle-1(2), Bhubaneswar Bhubaneswar Pan No. : Aaacn 7449 M (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधााररती की ओर से /Assessee By Shri A.K.Sabat & B.K.Mahapatra, Cas : राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By Shri M.K.Gautam, Cit Dr : सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 06/10/2020 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 28/10/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : These Are The Cross Appeals Filed By The Assessee & Revenue & Cross Objections By The Assessee, Against The Separate Orders Of The Cit(A)-1, Bhubaneswar, Dated 30.12.2017, 27.12.2018 & 24.10.2019

TDS is deductible either u/s.1941 or U/S.194J. Since tax is not deductible on the payments made as transmission/wheeling charges, no addition u/s.40(a)(ia) can be made. Accordingly; the addition of Rs.2,84,32,895/- u/s.40(a)(ia) is deleted. ITA Nos.39&69/CTK/2019 ITA Nos.01&65/CTK/2020 CO Nos.11/CTK/2019&08/CTK/2020 42. On perusal of the above observations

NATIONAL ALUMINIUM COMPANY LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE-1(2), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee and Revenue along

ITA 39/CTK/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack27 Oct 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.338/Ctk/2017 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.39/Ctk/2019 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.01/Ctk/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2009-2010, 2015-2016 & 2016-2017) National Aluminium Company Limited, Vs. Acit, Corporate Circle-1(2), Bhubaneswar Nalco Bhawan, P/1, Nayapalli, Bhubaneswar Pan No. : Aaacn 7449 M & आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.331/Ctk/2017 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.69/Ctk/2019 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.65/Ctk/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2009-2010, 2015-2016 & 2016-2017) National Aluminium Company Limited, Vs. Dcit/Acit, Nalco Bhawan, P/1, Nayapalli, Corporate Circle-1(2), Bhubaneswar Bhubaneswar Pan No. : Aaacn 7449 M & Cross Objection No.11/Ctk/2019 Cross Objection No.02/Ctk/2020 (Arising Out Of Ita Nos.69/Ctk/2019 & 65/Ctk/2020) (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2015-2016 & 2016-2017) National Aluminium Company Limited, Vs. Dcit/Acit, Nalco Bhavan, P/1, Nayapalli, Corporate Circle-1(2), Bhubaneswar Bhubaneswar Pan No. : Aaacn 7449 M (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधााररती की ओर से /Assessee By Shri A.K.Sabat & B.K.Mahapatra, Cas : राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By Shri M.K.Gautam, Cit Dr : सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 06/10/2020 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 28/10/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : These Are The Cross Appeals Filed By The Assessee & Revenue & Cross Objections By The Assessee, Against The Separate Orders Of The Cit(A)-1, Bhubaneswar, Dated 30.12.2017, 27.12.2018 & 24.10.2019

TDS is deductible either u/s.1941 or U/S.194J. Since tax is not deductible on the payments made as transmission/wheeling charges, no addition u/s.40(a)(ia) can be made. Accordingly; the addition of Rs.2,84,32,895/- u/s.40(a)(ia) is deleted. ITA Nos.39&69/CTK/2019 ITA Nos.01&65/CTK/2020 CO Nos.11/CTK/2019&08/CTK/2020 42. On perusal of the above observations

DCIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE- 1(2), BHUBANESWAR vs. M/S. NATIONAL ALUMINIUM COMPANY LTD., BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee and Revenue along

ITA 65/CTK/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack27 Oct 2020AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.338/Ctk/2017 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.39/Ctk/2019 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.01/Ctk/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2009-2010, 2015-2016 & 2016-2017) National Aluminium Company Limited, Vs. Acit, Corporate Circle-1(2), Bhubaneswar Nalco Bhawan, P/1, Nayapalli, Bhubaneswar Pan No. : Aaacn 7449 M & आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.331/Ctk/2017 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.69/Ctk/2019 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.65/Ctk/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2009-2010, 2015-2016 & 2016-2017) National Aluminium Company Limited, Vs. Dcit/Acit, Nalco Bhawan, P/1, Nayapalli, Corporate Circle-1(2), Bhubaneswar Bhubaneswar Pan No. : Aaacn 7449 M & Cross Objection No.11/Ctk/2019 Cross Objection No.02/Ctk/2020 (Arising Out Of Ita Nos.69/Ctk/2019 & 65/Ctk/2020) (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2015-2016 & 2016-2017) National Aluminium Company Limited, Vs. Dcit/Acit, Nalco Bhavan, P/1, Nayapalli, Corporate Circle-1(2), Bhubaneswar Bhubaneswar Pan No. : Aaacn 7449 M (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधााररती की ओर से /Assessee By Shri A.K.Sabat & B.K.Mahapatra, Cas : राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By Shri M.K.Gautam, Cit Dr : सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 06/10/2020 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 28/10/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : These Are The Cross Appeals Filed By The Assessee & Revenue & Cross Objections By The Assessee, Against The Separate Orders Of The Cit(A)-1, Bhubaneswar, Dated 30.12.2017, 27.12.2018 & 24.10.2019

TDS is deductible either u/s.1941 or U/S.194J. Since tax is not deductible on the payments made as transmission/wheeling charges, no addition u/s.40(a)(ia) can be made. Accordingly; the addition of Rs.2,84,32,895/- u/s.40(a)(ia) is deleted. ITA Nos.39&69/CTK/2019 ITA Nos.01&65/CTK/2020 CO Nos.11/CTK/2019&08/CTK/2020 42. On perusal of the above observations

NATIONAL ALUMINIUM COMPANY LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE- 1(2), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee and Revenue along

ITA 1/CTK/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack27 Oct 2020AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.338/Ctk/2017 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.39/Ctk/2019 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.01/Ctk/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2009-2010, 2015-2016 & 2016-2017) National Aluminium Company Limited, Vs. Acit, Corporate Circle-1(2), Bhubaneswar Nalco Bhawan, P/1, Nayapalli, Bhubaneswar Pan No. : Aaacn 7449 M & आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.331/Ctk/2017 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.69/Ctk/2019 आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.65/Ctk/2020 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2009-2010, 2015-2016 & 2016-2017) National Aluminium Company Limited, Vs. Dcit/Acit, Nalco Bhawan, P/1, Nayapalli, Corporate Circle-1(2), Bhubaneswar Bhubaneswar Pan No. : Aaacn 7449 M & Cross Objection No.11/Ctk/2019 Cross Objection No.02/Ctk/2020 (Arising Out Of Ita Nos.69/Ctk/2019 & 65/Ctk/2020) (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2015-2016 & 2016-2017) National Aluminium Company Limited, Vs. Dcit/Acit, Nalco Bhavan, P/1, Nayapalli, Corporate Circle-1(2), Bhubaneswar Bhubaneswar Pan No. : Aaacn 7449 M (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधााररती की ओर से /Assessee By Shri A.K.Sabat & B.K.Mahapatra, Cas : राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By Shri M.K.Gautam, Cit Dr : सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 06/10/2020 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 28/10/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : These Are The Cross Appeals Filed By The Assessee & Revenue & Cross Objections By The Assessee, Against The Separate Orders Of The Cit(A)-1, Bhubaneswar, Dated 30.12.2017, 27.12.2018 & 24.10.2019

TDS is deductible either u/s.1941 or U/S.194J. Since tax is not deductible on the payments made as transmission/wheeling charges, no addition u/s.40(a)(ia) can be made. Accordingly; the addition of Rs.2,84,32,895/- u/s.40(a)(ia) is deleted. ITA Nos.39&69/CTK/2019 ITA Nos.01&65/CTK/2020 CO Nos.11/CTK/2019&08/CTK/2020 42. On perusal of the above observations

SHISHU ANANTA MAHAVIDYALAYA,KHURDA vs. JCIT(TDS), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all the three appeals of assessee are allowed

ITA 201/CTK/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack06 Aug 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita Nos.201 To 203/Ctk/2018 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2010-2011 To 2012-2013) Shishu Ananta Mahavidyalaya, Vs. Jcit(Tds), Bhubaneswar Balipatana, Khurda-752102 Tan No. : Bbns00799 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

For Appellant: Shri P.C.Mishra, ARFor Respondent: Shri Subhendu Dutta, DR
Section 226(3)Section 272ASection 272A(2)(K)Section 272A(2)(k)Section 273B

TDS return within the time as specified in sub-section (3) of Section 200 or under the proviso to sub-section3

SHISHU ANANTA MAHAVIDYALAYA,KHURDA vs. JCIT(TDS), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all the three appeals of assessee are allowed

ITA 203/CTK/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack06 Aug 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita Nos.201 To 203/Ctk/2018 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2010-2011 To 2012-2013) Shishu Ananta Mahavidyalaya, Vs. Jcit(Tds), Bhubaneswar Balipatana, Khurda-752102 Tan No. : Bbns00799 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

For Appellant: Shri P.C.Mishra, ARFor Respondent: Shri Subhendu Dutta, DR
Section 226(3)Section 272ASection 272A(2)(K)Section 272A(2)(k)Section 273B

TDS return within the time as specified in sub-section (3) of Section 200 or under the proviso to sub-section3

SHISHU ANANTA MAHAVIDYALAYA,KHURDA vs. JCIT(TDS), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all the three appeals of assessee are allowed

ITA 202/CTK/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack06 Aug 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita Nos.201 To 203/Ctk/2018 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2010-2011 To 2012-2013) Shishu Ananta Mahavidyalaya, Vs. Jcit(Tds), Bhubaneswar Balipatana, Khurda-752102 Tan No. : Bbns00799 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

For Appellant: Shri P.C.Mishra, ARFor Respondent: Shri Subhendu Dutta, DR
Section 226(3)Section 272ASection 272A(2)(K)Section 272A(2)(k)Section 273B

TDS return within the time as specified in sub-section (3) of Section 200 or under the proviso to sub-section3

ACIT, BHUBANESWAR vs. M/S. NILACHAL CARBO METALICKS PVT. LTD., BHUBANESWAR

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue and cross objection filed

ITA 154/CTK/2015[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack11 Jul 2017AY 2005-06

Bench: S/Shri N.S Saini & Pavan Kumar Gadaleassessment Year:2005-06 Acit, Circle 1(2), Vs. Nilachal Carbo Metalicks Bhubaneswar. Private Limited., Plot No.73 & 74/353, Jaydev Vihar, Bhubaneswar. Pan/Gir No. Aajpu 6205 A (Appellant) .. ( Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri S.K.Agrawal, ARFor Respondent: Shri Kunal Singh, CIT DR
Section 139(1)Section 40

TDS provisions of the Act u/s 200, 201, 221 and Sections 271C and 276B of the Income-tax Act. The AO may also

SHRI DILIP KUMAR NAYAK,BHUBANESWAR vs. JCIT, RANGE-2, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for

ITA 86/CTK/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack05 Sept 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri N.S Saini & Pavan Kumar Gadaleassessment Year : 2010-2011

For Appellant: Sri P.K.Mishra, ARFor Respondent: Shri A.K.Mohapatra, CIT DR

TDS. The Assessing Officer's view is against the intent of the said circular. 15. This Court in Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Ltd. v. Dy. CIT [2016] 67 taxmann.com 259/238 Taxman 287/383 ITR 59 (Kar) while considering the applicability of P a g e 22 | 25 ITA No. 86/CT K/ 2017 Asse ssment Year : 20 10- 201 1 Section 194A