VODAFONE SPACETEL LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT(TDS-1), BHUBANESWAR, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, ITA No.307/CTK/2014, ITA No

Bench: Shri N.S.Saini, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.03, 04, 307 & 308/Ctk/2014 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years :2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13) Vodafone Spacetel Limited, Vs. Acit (Tds), Unit-41, E-52, Infocity, Bhubaneswar Chandrasekharpur, Chandaka Industrial Estate, Bhubaneswar- 751024 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aabce 2207 R (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) .. "नधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Sparsh Bhargava, Ar राज"व क" ओर से /Revenue By : Shri A.K.Mohapatra, Cit Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 08/08/2017 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement 11/08/2017 आदेश / O R D E R Per Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm: The Assessee Has Filed These Appeals Against The Different Orders Of Cit(A)-I, Bhubaneswar For The Assessment Years 2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13. Since The Issues Are Common In All The Appeals, Therefore, They Are Clubbed Together, Heard & Disposed Off By This Consolidated Order. For The Sake Of Convenience, We Take Up Assessee’S Appeal I.E. Ita No.307/Ctk/2014 For The Assessment Year 2011-12 & Facts Narrated Therein. 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Company Is In The Business Of Providing Telecommunication Services In Various Parts Of India. There Was Survey Operation U/S.133A Of The Act In The Premises Of The Assessee On 29.9.2011 & Revenue Found Violation Of Provisions Of Tds & Ita Nos.307 & 308/14 In Non-Deducting Tds In Respect Of Payments Dealt In The Financial Year

194H are applicable and considering the submission made by the assessee as on 26.2.2013 in respect of pre-paid SIM card, observed that the assessee has not deducted TDS and, therefore, calculated TDS at 10% under the provisions of Section

VODAFONE SPACETAL LTD,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT(TDS), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, ITA No.307/CTK/2014, ITA No

Bench: Shri N.S.Saini, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.03, 04, 307 & 308/Ctk/2014 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years :2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13) Vodafone Spacetel Limited, Vs. Acit (Tds), Unit-41, E-52, Infocity, Bhubaneswar Chandrasekharpur, Chandaka Industrial Estate, Bhubaneswar- 751024 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aabce 2207 R (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) .. "नधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Sparsh Bhargava, Ar राज"व क" ओर से /Revenue By : Shri A.K.Mohapatra, Cit Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 08/08/2017 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement 11/08/2017 आदेश / O R D E R Per Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm: The Assessee Has Filed These Appeals Against The Different Orders Of Cit(A)-I, Bhubaneswar For The Assessment Years 2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13. Since The Issues Are Common In All The Appeals, Therefore, They Are Clubbed Together, Heard & Disposed Off By This Consolidated Order. For The Sake Of Convenience, We Take Up Assessee’S Appeal I.E. Ita No.307/Ctk/2014 For The Assessment Year 2011-12 & Facts Narrated Therein. 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Company Is In The Business Of Providing Telecommunication Services In Various Parts Of India. There Was Survey Operation U/S.133A Of The Act In The Premises Of The Assessee On 29.9.2011 & Revenue Found Violation Of Provisions Of Tds & Ita Nos.307 & 308/14 In Non-Deducting Tds In Respect Of Payments Dealt In The Financial Year

194H are applicable and considering the submission made by the assessee as on 26.2.2013 in respect of pre-paid SIM card, observed that the assessee has not deducted TDS and, therefore, calculated TDS at 10% under the provisions of Section

VODAFONE SPACETAL LTD,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT(TDS), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, ITA No.307/CTK/2014, ITA No

Bench: Shri N.S.Saini, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.03, 04, 307 & 308/Ctk/2014 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years :2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13) Vodafone Spacetel Limited, Vs. Acit (Tds), Unit-41, E-52, Infocity, Bhubaneswar Chandrasekharpur, Chandaka Industrial Estate, Bhubaneswar- 751024 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aabce 2207 R (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) .. "नधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Sparsh Bhargava, Ar राज"व क" ओर से /Revenue By : Shri A.K.Mohapatra, Cit Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 08/08/2017 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement 11/08/2017 आदेश / O R D E R Per Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm: The Assessee Has Filed These Appeals Against The Different Orders Of Cit(A)-I, Bhubaneswar For The Assessment Years 2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13. Since The Issues Are Common In All The Appeals, Therefore, They Are Clubbed Together, Heard & Disposed Off By This Consolidated Order. For The Sake Of Convenience, We Take Up Assessee’S Appeal I.E. Ita No.307/Ctk/2014 For The Assessment Year 2011-12 & Facts Narrated Therein. 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Company Is In The Business Of Providing Telecommunication Services In Various Parts Of India. There Was Survey Operation U/S.133A Of The Act In The Premises Of The Assessee On 29.9.2011 & Revenue Found Violation Of Provisions Of Tds & Ita Nos.307 & 308/14 In Non-Deducting Tds In Respect Of Payments Dealt In The Financial Year

194H are applicable and considering the submission made by the assessee as on 26.2.2013 in respect of pre-paid SIM card, observed that the assessee has not deducted TDS and, therefore, calculated TDS at 10% under the provisions of Section

VODAFONE SPACETEL LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT(TDS-1), BHUBANESWAR, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, ITA No.307/CTK/2014, ITA No

Bench: Shri N.S.Saini, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.03, 04, 307 & 308/Ctk/2014 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years :2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13) Vodafone Spacetel Limited, Vs. Acit (Tds), Unit-41, E-52, Infocity, Bhubaneswar Chandrasekharpur, Chandaka Industrial Estate, Bhubaneswar- 751024 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aabce 2207 R (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) .. "नधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Sparsh Bhargava, Ar राज"व क" ओर से /Revenue By : Shri A.K.Mohapatra, Cit Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 08/08/2017 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement 11/08/2017 आदेश / O R D E R Per Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm: The Assessee Has Filed These Appeals Against The Different Orders Of Cit(A)-I, Bhubaneswar For The Assessment Years 2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13. Since The Issues Are Common In All The Appeals, Therefore, They Are Clubbed Together, Heard & Disposed Off By This Consolidated Order. For The Sake Of Convenience, We Take Up Assessee’S Appeal I.E. Ita No.307/Ctk/2014 For The Assessment Year 2011-12 & Facts Narrated Therein. 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Company Is In The Business Of Providing Telecommunication Services In Various Parts Of India. There Was Survey Operation U/S.133A Of The Act In The Premises Of The Assessee On 29.9.2011 & Revenue Found Violation Of Provisions Of Tds & Ita Nos.307 & 308/14 In Non-Deducting Tds In Respect Of Payments Dealt In The Financial Year

194H are applicable and considering the submission made by the assessee as on 26.2.2013 in respect of pre-paid SIM card, observed that the assessee has not deducted TDS and, therefore, calculated TDS at 10% under the provisions of Section

ADITYA MOHAPATRA,DHENKANAL vs. PRINCIPAL CIT-2, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.155/Ctk/2016 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2012-2013) Sri Aditya Mohapatra, Vs. Pr.Cit-2, Bhubaneswar Prop.: Orissa Motors, Kujakanta, Main Road, Dhenkanal. Pan No. : Aaacl 6593 N (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधाारिती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Damodar Pati, Advocate िाजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri M.K.Gautam,Cit Dr सुनवाई की तािीख / Date Of Hearing : 26/08/2020 घोषणा की तािीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 07/09/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per L.P.Sahu, Am: The Assessee Has Filed This Appeal Against The Revisionary Order Passed U/S.263 Of The Act By The Pr.Cit-2, Bhubaneswar, Dated 21.03.2016 For The A.Y.2012-2013. 2. Earlier This Appeal Was Disposed Off By This Tribunal Vide Order Dated 29.08.2017. Thereafter The Assessee Challenged The Order Of The Tribunal Before The Hon’Ble Jurisdictional High Court & The Hon’Ble High Court Vide Order Dated 21.03.2018 Passed In W.P.(C)No.22608 Of 2017 Set Aside The Order Of The Tribunal To Pass Fresh Order Directing The Assessee To File The Documents As He Wants. Accordingly, The Appeal Of The Assessee Restored To Its Original Number & Finally Heard With The Consent Of Both The Parties.

Section 194H of the Act wherein the conditions have been stipulated for deducting TDS. The relevant provisions of Section 194H

MAHANADI METAL AND CHEMICALS PRIVATE LIMITED,ROURKELA vs. ITO, WARD-1, ROURKELA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.496/Ctk/2017 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2010 - 2011) M/S Mahanadi Metal & Vs. Ito, Ward-1, Rourkela Chemicals Private Limited, T/4/26/Civil Township, Rourkela-769004 स्थायी ऱेखा सं./Pan No. : Aaccm 4844 R (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. यनधागररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Parimal Kumar Jain, Ca राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Subhendu Dutta, Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 16/01/2020 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 18/03/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per L.P.Sahu, Am : This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against Order Of Cit(A), Sambalpur, Dated 04.09.2017 For The Assessment Year 2010-2011, On The Following Grounds Of Appeal :- 1. On The Fact & Under Circumstances Of The Case The Commissioner (Appeals) Was Not Justified In Holding The Nature Of Expenses Of S/ 957144 Under The Head Commission Instead Of Contract Work. (Para 4). 2. On The Fact & Under Circumstances Of The Case The Commissioner (Appeals) Erred In Understanding The Accounting Entry Of Discount Of Rs. 16,91,687 & Wrongly Treated The Bogus Sundry Creditor. (Para8) 3. On The Fact & Under Circumstances Of The Case The Commissioner (Appeals) Was Not Justified In Rejection Of Additional Evidence & Confirming The Disallowance Of Rs. 999390 For Non-Submission Of Vat Return, (Para-9) 4. On The Fact & Under Circumstances Of The Case The Commissioner (Appeals) Was Unjustified For Not Sending For Remand The Case & Confirming The Addition Of Rs.2799978. 2 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Filed Return Of Income

TDS has been made by the assessee, therefore, the AO issued show cause notice stating that the assessee has violated the provisions of Section 194H

M/S TATA SELESERVICES LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT(TDS), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri N.S.Saini, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.437/Ctk/2012 (धनधाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2007-2008) M/S Tata Teleservices Limited, Vs. Acit(Tds), Bhubaneswar Module-B&C, 3Rd Floor, Fortune Tower, Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar-751023 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaact 2438 A (अपीलाथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) धनधााररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Sanjay Chopra, Ar राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri D.K.Pradhan, Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 11/07/2017 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement 14/07/2017 आदेश / O R D E R Per Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm: The Assessee Has Filed An Appeal Against The Order Of Cit(A)-1, Bhubaneswar, Passed In Ita No.0088/08-09, Dated 03.05.2012, U/S.201(1)/201(1A) Of The Income Tax Act. 2. The Assessee Has Raised The Grounds That The Cit(A) Erred In Confirming The Addition Holding That Provisions Of Section 194H Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 Are Applicable On The Discounts, On Sale Of Recharge Vouchers & The Starter Kits Made By The Assessee & Also Challenged The Action Of Cit(A) In Respect Of Business Transaction Of The Assessee Based On The Conduct Of The Parties Including The Agreement Entered With Its Distributors To Be That Of Principal To Principal Basis & Not That Of Principal To Agent Basis. 3. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Is Engaged In The Business Of Providing Telecommunication Services Comprising Basic

TDS has to be deducted in respect of distributor franchise on sale of starter pack recharge vouchers and invoked Section 194H

BISWAJIT DAS,BHUBANESWAR vs. ITO, WARD-1(1), BHUBANESWAR, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed and the

Bench: Shri N.S Saini & Shri Aby T. Varkeyassessment Year :2010-2011

TDS was required to be deducted u/s.194H of the Act. 12. The CIT(A) after considering the submission of the assessee held that since payment made to Shri Raj Kishore Sahoo was in the nature of brokerage and commission and the payment was made in India, tax was deductible u/s.194H of the Act and dismissed the ground of appeal

ITO, WARD-2(2), BHUBANESWAR, BHUBANESWAR vs. BISWAJIT DAS, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed and the

Bench: Shri N.S Saini & Shri Aby T. Varkeyassessment Year :2010-2011

TDS was required to be deducted u/s.194H of the Act. 12. The CIT(A) after considering the submission of the assessee held that since payment made to Shri Raj Kishore Sahoo was in the nature of brokerage and commission and the payment was made in India, tax was deductible u/s.194H of the Act and dismissed the ground of appeal

M/S. BALASORE CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD.,BALASORE vs. ACIT, BALASORE CIRCLE, BALASORE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.467/Ctk/2017 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2012-2013) M/S Balasore Cooperative Bank Vs. Acit, Balasore Circle, Limited, Balasore Bibekananda Marg, Balasore-756001 Pan No. : Aaccb 7823 M (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधााररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri S.N.Sahu/Somnath Sahoo,Advs राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri M.K.Gautam, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 13/08/2020 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 12/10/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per L.P.Sahu, Am: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Passed By The Cit(A), Cuttack, Dated 04.08.2017, For The Assessment Year 2012-2013, On The Following Grounds Of Appeal :- 1) That The Order Of The Id. Cit(Appeals) Confirming The Additions & Disallowances Made By The A.O. Is Illegal, Arbitrary, Unjustified & Not In Accordance With Law. 2) That The Addition Of Rs. 36,79,148/- U/S. 40(A)(Ia) Of The I.T. Act, 1961 Confirmed By Cit(Appeals) To The Extent Of Rs. 36,30,998/- Is Illegal, Arbitrary, Uncalled For & Not In Accordance With Law & The Same Should Have Been Deleted By The Learned Cit(Appeals). 3) That The Disallowance U/S 40(A)(Ia) Of Rs. 36,79,148/- As Detailed Below Is Illegal, Arbitrary & Unjustified & Hence Should Have Been Deleted By The Learned Cit(A) As The Genuineness Is Not In Doubt. Non-Deduction Of Tds Is A Separate Issue. A) Commission Payment To Dlds Collection Agents Rs. 33,45,248/- B) Legal Expenses Rs. 2,52,000/- C) Audit Fees Rs. 81,900/-

194H; (ii) "fees for technical services" shall have the same meaning as in Explanation 2 to clause (vii) of sub- section (1) of section 9; (iii) "professional services" shall have the same meaning as in clause (a) of the Explanation to section 194J; (iv) "work" shall have the same meaning as in Explanation III to section 194C; ** ** ** 15 13.3 Section

M/S. RUKMANI INFRA PROJECTS PVT. LTD.,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT(TDS-1), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the assessee

TDS was deducted and, therefore, provisions of Section 194H of the Act are applied. The AO issued show cause notice

M/S. RUKMANI INFRA PROJECTS PVT. LTD.,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT(TDS-1), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the assessee

TDS was deducted and, therefore, provisions of Section 194H of the Act are applied. The AO issued show cause notice

DCIT, BHUBANESWAR vs. NEELACHAL ISPAT NIGAM LTD., BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals filed by the revenue in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri N.S.Saini, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita Nos.382, 298, 435, 299, 436 & 448/Ctk/2015 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2006-07, 2007-08,2008-09, 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13) Dcit, Corporate Circle- Vs. Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. & Cross Objection Nos.48, 37, 53, 38 & 54/Ctk/2015 (Arising Out Of Ita Nos.382, 298,435,299,& 436/Ctk/2015) (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2006-07, 2007-08,2008-09, 2010-11, 2011-12) Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., Vs. Acit, Corporate Circle- 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. & आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.09/Ctk/2016 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2012-2013) Acit, Corporate Circle- Vs. Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Kunal Singh, Dr ननधााररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Satyajit Mishra, Ar

TDS under the provisions of Section 194H, therefore, notice u/s.148 was issued. In compliance to the same, ld. AR of the assessee

DCIT, BHUBANESWAR vs. NEELACHAL ISPAT NIGAM LTD., BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals filed by the revenue in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri N.S.Saini, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita Nos.382, 298, 435, 299, 436 & 448/Ctk/2015 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2006-07, 2007-08,2008-09, 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13) Dcit, Corporate Circle- Vs. Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. & Cross Objection Nos.48, 37, 53, 38 & 54/Ctk/2015 (Arising Out Of Ita Nos.382, 298,435,299,& 436/Ctk/2015) (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2006-07, 2007-08,2008-09, 2010-11, 2011-12) Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., Vs. Acit, Corporate Circle- 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. & आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.09/Ctk/2016 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2012-2013) Acit, Corporate Circle- Vs. Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Kunal Singh, Dr ननधााररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Satyajit Mishra, Ar

TDS under the provisions of Section 194H, therefore, notice u/s.148 was issued. In compliance to the same, ld. AR of the assessee

ACIT(TDS), BHUBANESWAR vs. NEELACHAL ISPAT NIGAM LIMITED, JAJPUR

In the result, appeals filed by the revenue in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri N.S.Saini, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita Nos.382, 298, 435, 299, 436 & 448/Ctk/2015 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2006-07, 2007-08,2008-09, 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13) Dcit, Corporate Circle- Vs. Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. & Cross Objection Nos.48, 37, 53, 38 & 54/Ctk/2015 (Arising Out Of Ita Nos.382, 298,435,299,& 436/Ctk/2015) (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2006-07, 2007-08,2008-09, 2010-11, 2011-12) Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., Vs. Acit, Corporate Circle- 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. & आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.09/Ctk/2016 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2012-2013) Acit, Corporate Circle- Vs. Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Kunal Singh, Dr ननधााररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Satyajit Mishra, Ar

TDS under the provisions of Section 194H, therefore, notice u/s.148 was issued. In compliance to the same, ld. AR of the assessee

ACIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE-1(2), BHUBANESWAR vs. M/S. NEELACHAL ISPAT NIGAM LIMITED, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals filed by the revenue in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri N.S.Saini, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita Nos.382, 298, 435, 299, 436 & 448/Ctk/2015 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2006-07, 2007-08,2008-09, 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13) Dcit, Corporate Circle- Vs. Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. & Cross Objection Nos.48, 37, 53, 38 & 54/Ctk/2015 (Arising Out Of Ita Nos.382, 298,435,299,& 436/Ctk/2015) (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2006-07, 2007-08,2008-09, 2010-11, 2011-12) Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., Vs. Acit, Corporate Circle- 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. & आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.09/Ctk/2016 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2012-2013) Acit, Corporate Circle- Vs. Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Kunal Singh, Dr ननधााररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Satyajit Mishra, Ar

TDS under the provisions of Section 194H, therefore, notice u/s.148 was issued. In compliance to the same, ld. AR of the assessee

ACIT, BHUBANESWAR vs. M/S. NEELACHAL ISPAT NIGAM LTD., BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals filed by the revenue in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri N.S.Saini, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita Nos.382, 298, 435, 299, 436 & 448/Ctk/2015 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2006-07, 2007-08,2008-09, 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13) Dcit, Corporate Circle- Vs. Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. & Cross Objection Nos.48, 37, 53, 38 & 54/Ctk/2015 (Arising Out Of Ita Nos.382, 298,435,299,& 436/Ctk/2015) (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2006-07, 2007-08,2008-09, 2010-11, 2011-12) Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., Vs. Acit, Corporate Circle- 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. & आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.09/Ctk/2016 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2012-2013) Acit, Corporate Circle- Vs. Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Kunal Singh, Dr ननधााररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Satyajit Mishra, Ar

TDS under the provisions of Section 194H, therefore, notice u/s.148 was issued. In compliance to the same, ld. AR of the assessee

DCIT, BHUBANESWAR vs. M/S. NEELACHAL ISPAT NIGAM LIMITED, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals filed by the revenue in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri N.S.Saini, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita Nos.382, 298, 435, 299, 436 & 448/Ctk/2015 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2006-07, 2007-08,2008-09, 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13) Dcit, Corporate Circle- Vs. Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. & Cross Objection Nos.48, 37, 53, 38 & 54/Ctk/2015 (Arising Out Of Ita Nos.382, 298,435,299,& 436/Ctk/2015) (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Years :2006-07, 2007-08,2008-09, 2010-11, 2011-12) Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., Vs. Acit, Corporate Circle- 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. & आयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.09/Ctk/2016 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2012-2013) Acit, Corporate Circle- Vs. Neelachal Ispat Nigam Ltd., 1St Floor, Annexe Building, 1(2), Bhubaneswar. Ipicol, House, Janpath, Bhubaneswar-751022 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaacn 9433 B (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Kunal Singh, Dr ननधााररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Satyajit Mishra, Ar

TDS under the provisions of Section 194H, therefore, notice u/s.148 was issued. In compliance to the same, ld. AR of the assessee