BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “TDS”+ Section 167B(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai12Ahmedabad3Cuttack3Lucknow2Hyderabad2Pune2Visakhapatnam1SC1Bangalore1

Key Topics

Section 12A10Section 167B(1)6Section 323Charitable Trust3Exemption3TDS3Disallowance3Section 167B2

DR NARAYAN PRASAD DAS MEMORIAL CHARITABLE PUBLIC TRUST,CUTTACK vs. ITO EXEMPTION,CUTTACK, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 74/CTK/2026[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack26 Feb 2026AY 2023-24

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Madhusudan Sawdiadr Narayan Prasad Das Memorial Income Tax Officer Charitable Public Trust, At-Tigiria, Po: (Exemption), Cuttack Vs. Tigiria, Dist: Cuttack Pan No.Aaetd 1589 R Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 12ASection 167B(1)

section 167B(1) would not apply and levy of maximum marginal rate of tax does not apply in the case of the assessee. 4. In reply, Id Sr DR vehemently supported the orders of the Assessing Officer and Id CTT(A). 5. We have considered the rival submissions. A perusal of the facts in the present case clearly shows that

PRADEEP KUMAR SAHOO,KUNDI MOHANTYPADA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD BHADRAK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 47/CTK/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed
ITAT Cuttack
25 Feb 2026
AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Madhusudan Sawdiadr Narayan Prasad Das Memorial Income Tax Officer Charitable Public Trust, At-Tigiria, Po: (Exemption), Cuttack Vs. Tigiria, Dist: Cuttack Pan No.Aaetd 1589 R Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 12ASection 167B(1)

section 167B(1) would not apply and levy of maximum marginal rate of tax does not apply in the case of the assessee. 4. In reply, Id Sr DR vehemently supported the orders of the Assessing Officer and Id CTT(A). 5. We have considered the rival submissions. A perusal of the facts in the present case clearly shows that

ABHISEK EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST,BHUBANESWAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD, BHUBANESWAR, PRATYAKSHA KAR BHAWAN,

In the result, appeal of the assessee stands partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 346/CTK/2024[2017-18]Status: HeardITAT Cuttack19 Nov 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Before Shri George Mathanmember & Manish Agarwal Manish Agarwalassessment Year : 2017-18 Abhisek Abhisek Educational Educational & And Vs. Income Income Tax Tax Officer, Officer, Charitable Trust, Mig Charitable Trust, Mig-B-18, Exemption Exemption Ward, Ward, Nayapalli, Bhubaneswar Nayapalli, Bhubaneswar Bhubaneswar. Pan/Gir No. No.Aacta 5203 D (Appellant (Appellant) .. ( Respondent Respondent) Assessee By : Shri K.C.Jena,Ca Revenue By : Shri Charan Dass, Sr Dr , Sr Dr Date Of Hearing : 19/11/20 2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 19/11/20 024 O R D E R Per Bench

For Appellant: Shri K.C.Jena,CAFor Respondent: Shri Charan Dass, Sr DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 154Section 167BSection 32

section 167B of the Act, maximum marginal rate is applicable and the action of the Assessing Officer in applying the maximum marginal rate to compute the tax liability of the assessee is upheld. 7. Coming to the issue of non-granting of the benefit of TDS, the issue is restored to the file of the Assessing Officer for readjudication