SOUMYA RANJAN MOHANTY,BHUBANESWAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4(2), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri N.S.Saini

reopening of the assessment on 30.09.2014 and the objection of the assessee was that he had claimed TDS and, therefore

ACIT, BHUBANESWAR vs. INDIAN METALS & FERRO ALLOYS LTD, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed and the

Bench: S/Shri N.S Saini & Pavan Kumar Gadale

reopening the assessment. 7. It is the submission of ld A.R. of the assessee that the assessee had imported raw materials worth Rs.6999.60 lakhs, components and spare parts of Rs.697.84 Lakhs from foreign suppliers both aggregating to Rs. 7697.44 lakhs. The said payments were duly disclosed in the audited statement of accounts for the year ended 31`.3.2007 under

INDIAN METALS AND FERRO ALLOY LTD,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed and the

Bench: S/Shri N.S Saini & Pavan Kumar Gadale

reopening the assessment. 7. It is the submission of ld A.R. of the assessee that the assessee had imported raw materials worth Rs.6999.60 lakhs, components and spare parts of Rs.697.84 Lakhs from foreign suppliers both aggregating to Rs. 7697.44 lakhs. The said payments were duly disclosed in the audited statement of accounts for the year ended 31`.3.2007 under

M/S BSN JOSHI & SONS LTD,KHURDA vs. ACIT, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Laxmi Prasad Sahuassessment Year : 2003-2004

assessment was reopened were stated to be as follows: “1. The assessee had shown Rs.1,47,91,276/- as income from supervision and service charges wherein as per the TDS

M/S. G.N.MOHANTY AND CO.,BHUBANESWAR vs. ITO, WARD-1(2), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Gargassessment Year: 2007-08 M/S. G.N.Mohanty & Co., Plot Vs. Ito, Ward 1(2), Bhubaneswar. No.2060/2061,2062 S, Samatarpur Chhak, Bhubaneswar. Pan/Gir No.Aaefg 3478 J (Appellant) .. ( Respondent)

reopened the assessment u/s.147 of the Act, inter alia, recording the following reasons: “ “on verification of the assessment details, it was noticed that during the assessment proceedings, the assessee firm has filed statements of gross commission/brokerage, contract receipts, etc. of Rs.31,58,934/- with claim of TDS

RABINDRA KUMAR MOHANTY,BHUBANESWAR vs. ITO, WARD-2(2), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, Appeal of the assessee in ITANo

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri Manish Borad, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.300/Ctk/2016 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2009-2010) Rabindra Kumar Mohanty, Vs Ito, Ward-2(2), C/O Dr. Basudev Mishra, Bhubaneswar Plot No.3C/1, 1St Floor, Near Raj Bhawan Square, Unit-8, Bhubaneswar- 751012 Pan No. : Abxpm 8506 B (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधाारिती की ओर से /Assessee : Shri Natabar Panda, Advocate By िाजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr.Dr सुनवाई की तािीख / Date Of Hearing : 26/10/2021 घोषणा की तािीख/Date : 21/12/2021 Of Pronouncement आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench: The Captioned Appeal Filed At The Instance Of Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Passed By The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)-2, Bhubaneswar (In Short ‘The Cit(A)’), Dated 22.02.2016 For The Assessment Year 2009-2010. 2. This Appeal Itano.300/Ctk/2016 Was Dismissed By This Tribunal Vide Order Dated 30.08.2017 On Account Of Non- Appearance On The Part Of The Assessee. Thereafter The Assessee Took The Matter Before The Hon’Ble High Court & The Hon’Ble High Court In W.P.(C) No.2487 Of 2019, Vide

assessment proceeding. 10.2. As regards the second reason of reopening for the alleged excess assets over liabilities to the tune of Rs.2,23,885/-, we find that there is no element of escarpment of income as it is the TDS

SIBA NARAYAN ROUT,BHADRAK vs. ACIT, BALASORE CIRCLE, BALASORE

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

TDS and as per the audit objection. Ld A.R. explained that in the original assessment, the Assessing Officer has looked into these aspects and passed the assessment order and on the very same set of facts and based on audit objection, the assessment cannot be reopened

LATEST GENERATION ENTERTAINMENT PVT. LTD.,CUTTACK vs. DCIT, CPC-TDS,

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: S/Shri N.S Saini & Pavan Kumar Gadale

assessment year prior to 1.6.2015. However, we make it clear that, if any deductor has already paid the fee after intimation received under Section 200A, the aforesaid view will not permit the deductor to reopen the said question unless he has made payment under protest. 23. In view of the aforesaid observation and discussion, since the impugned intimation given

ITO, CUTTACK vs. ASHOK KUMAR BAJORIA, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the revenue is allowed for statistical purposes and cross objection of the assessee is dismissed

reopening the assessment. Subsequently, notice u/s.143(2) and 142(1) of the Act were issued to the assessee. In compliance, the ld. AR of the assessee appeared and the AO obtained confirmation of the 3 & CO No.42/CTK/2015 transactions by the assessee with Indian Oil Corporation from Chennai and as per the clarifications, the assessee was called to furnish the quantitative

INDERPAL SINGH CHHABRA,ROURKELA vs. ACIT, ROURKELA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rajesh Kumarआयकर अपील सं/Ita No.450/Ctk/2024 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2018-2019) Inderpal Singh Chhabra Vs Acit, Circle Rourkela Prop: Essar Enterprises Daily Market, C/O Crazy Cool, Main Rd, Po/Ps : Rourkela, Dist : Sundargarh Pan No. :Ajlpc 6337 J (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) .. नििााररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri P.K.Mishra & Shri Baidyanath Behera, Advocates राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Sanjay Kumar, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 08/04/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 08/04/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld Cit(A), Nfac, Delhi Dated 04.09.2024 In Din & Order No.Itba/Nfac/S/250/2024-25/1068345718(1)), For The Assessment Year 2018-19. 2. Shri P.K.Mishra, Advocate Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee. Shri Sanjay Kumar, Ld Cit Dr Represented On Behalf Of The Revenue. 3. The Assessee Is Engaged In The Transportation Of Coal & Trading In Coals. It Was Submitted By Ld Ar That The Original Return Filed By The Assessee Came To Be Processed U/S.143(3) Of The Act By The Nfac & The Assessment Came To Be Completed On 10.02.2021 Accepting The Returned Income. Ld Ar Drew Our Attention To Page 3 Of The Paper Book

TDS deduction details. Please find attach the scan copy of voucher for labour payment paid to daily labours and scan copy of voucher alongwith invoices for travelling expenses. Please allow us the time as required for furnishing the reply. Thanking you. Yours Faithfully, Inderpal Singh Chhabra Essar Enterprises, Daily Market C/o Crazy Cool, Main Road Rourkela-769001 Odisha

M/S. BAJRANGBALI STEEL INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD,ROURKLA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, SAMBALPUR

In the result, appeals of the assessee in IT(SS)A No

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Arun Khodpiaआयकर अऩीऱ (तऱाशियाां और अशिग्रहण)/It(Ss)A Nos.31 To 33/Ctk/2022 (ननधाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2016-2017 To 2018-2019) M/S Bee Pee Rollers Pvt. Ltd., Vs Acit, Central Circle, Sambalpur Lal Building, Kachery Road, Rourkela, Sundergarh, Odisha-769012 Pan No. :Aabcb 3593 P & आयकर अऩीऱ (तऱाशियाां और अशिग्रहण)/It(Ss)A Nos.34 To 39/Ctk/2022 & आयकर अऩीऱ/Ita No.109/Ctk/2022 (ननधाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2014-2017 To 2020-2021) M/S Bajrangbali Steel Industries Pvt. Vs Acit, Central Circle, Sambalpur Ltd., Lal Building, Kachery Road, Rourkela, Sundergarh, Odisha-769012 Pan No. :Aabcb 3594 L & आयकर अऩीऱ (तऱाशियाां और अशिग्रहण)/It(Ss)A Nos.40 To 44/Ctk/2022 (ननधाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2014-2015 To 2018-2019) M/S Bajrangbali Re-Rollers Pvt. Ltd. Vs Acit, Central Circle, Sambalpur Lal Building, Kachery Road, Rourkela, Sundergarh, Odisha-769012 Pan No. :Aaccb 6678 A (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधााररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri S.K.Tulsiyan, Advocate With Shri B.K. Tibrewal, Ca & Ms. Nisha Rachh, Ca Shri M.K.Gautam, Pr.Cit(Osd) राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 28/03/2023 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 28/03/2023

reopen the assessment proceeding already made and determine the total income of the assessee. The Assessing Officer, while exercising the power under Section 153A of the Act, would make assessment and compute the total income of the assessee including the undisclosed income, notwithstanding the assessee had filed the return before the date of search which stood processed under Section

MAA JAGAT JANANI SEVA TRUST,NAMBIRA vs. ACIT (EXEMPTION CIRCLE), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeal of the assessee stands allowed

Bench: Before Shri George Mathan, Judicial & Manish Agarwal Manish Agarwalassessment Year : 2014-2015 2015 Maa Maa Jagat Jagat Janani Janani Seva Seva Vs. Asst. Asst. Commissioner Commissioner Of Of Trust, At- -Nambira, Po: Income Income Tax, Tax, Exemption Exemption Bamebari, Ps: Joda, Dist: Bamebari, Ps: Joda, Dist: Circle, Bhubaneswar Circle, Bhubaneswar Keonjhar Pan/Gir No Pan/Gir No.Aadtm 1575 H (Appellant (Appellant) .. ( Respondent Respondent) Assessee By : Shri P.K.Mishra, P.K.Mishra, Adv Revenue By : Shri Sanjay Kumar, Cit : Shri Sanjay Kumar, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing : 16/0 07/2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 16/0 /07/2024 O R D E R Per Bench This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Ord This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Ord This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld Cit(A), Nfac, Delhi Cit(A), Nfac, Delhi Dated 7.6.2023 In Appeal No.Nfac/2013 Nfac/2013-14/10180318 For The Assessment Year For The Assessment Year 2014-15. 2. Shri P.K.Mishra, P.K.Mishra, Ld Ar Appeared For The Assessee & Shri The Assessee & Shri Sanjay Kumar, Ld Cit Kumar, Ld Cit Dr Appeared For The Revenue.

reopening is on the basis of verification of the income and expenditure account. This income and expenditure account was very much with the Assessing Officer in the course of original assessment. The second evidence which has been considered by the Assessing Officer is 26AS of the donor Essar Steel India Ltd. This evidence was also available in the course

ACIT, SAMBALPUR vs. M/S MAHANADI COALFIELDS LTD, SAMBALPUR

In the result, the appeal is allowed

Bench: Shri N.S.Saini, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.396/Ctk/2013 (धनधाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2008-2009) Acit, Circle-2(1), Sambalpur Vs. M/S Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd., Jagriti Vihar, Burla, Sambalpur स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aabcm 5188 P (अपीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Kunal Singh, Citdr निर्ााररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri S.S.Poddar/N.Kedia, Ar सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 04/10/2017 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement 09/10/2017 आदेश / O R D E R Per Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm: The Revenue Has Filed An Appeal Against The Order Of Cit(A), Cuttack, In Appeal No.0403/2012-13, Dated 23.05.2013, Passed U/S.147/143(3)/250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 For The Assessment Year 2008-2009, Wherein The Revenue Has Raised The Following Grounds :- 1. Whether The Learned First Appellate Authority Was Justified In Relying On Writ Cases Ignoring The Fact That Specific Findings In Writ-Petitions Can Not Be Straightaway Applied To Other Cases. 2. Whether The Learned Appellate Authority Was Justified To Hold That There Is Change In Opinion Of The Assessing Officer Regarding Admissibility / Inadmissibility Of Expenditure While Proceeding U/S.147 Of The 1.T. Act,1961 As Compared To His Findings In The Original Assessment Order. 3. Whether The Ld. First Appellate Authority Was Justified To Delete The Disallowance Of Rs.696.10 Lakhs Made By The Assessing Officer Towards 'Prior Period Expenses', Totally Ignoring The Findings Of The Assessing Officer. 4. Whether The Learned First Appellate Authority Was Justified To Delete The Disallowance Of Rs.631.34 Lakhs Made By The Assessing Officer Towards `Unpaid Statutory Liability' Under Section 43B Of The I.T. Act,1961, Totally Ignoring The Findings Of The Assessing Officer.

TDS on 3 IICM charges of Rs.440.05 lakhs paid to its holding company and was disallowed and assessed the total income at Rs.243891.31 lakhs and passed the order u/s.147/143(3) of the Act dated 22.02.2013. 4. Aggrieved by the order of AO, the assessee filed an appeal with the CIT(A). In the appellate proceedings

MEDIA ANUPAM LTD.,BERHAMPUR vs. ITO (TDS)-2, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.440 To 449/Ctk/2019 (Ay:2014-2015)( Quarter-1) 26Q (Ay:2014-2015)( Quarter-2) 26Q (Ay:2014-2015) (Quarter-3) 26Q (Ay:2014-2015) (Quarter-4) 26Q (Ay:2015-2016) (Quarter-1) 26Q (Ay:2015-2016) (Quarter-2) 26Q (Ay:2015-2016) (Quarter-3) 26Q (Ay:2015-2016) (Quarter-4) 26Q (Ay:2016-2017) (Quarter-3) 26Q (Ay:2016-2017) (Quarter-4) 26Q Media Anupam Ltd. Vs. Ito(Tds)-2, Bhubaneswar Panchsheela Marg, Industrial Estate, Berhampur-760008 Pan No. Aabcm 2118 B, Tanno. : Bbnm00762G (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधाारिती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri A.K.Padhy, Fca िाजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri J.K.Lenka, Dr सुनवाई की तािीख / Date Of Hearing : 24/02/2020 घोषणा की तािीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 25/02/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : These Are The Ten Appeals Have Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Cit(A)-1, Bhubaneswar All Dated 25.09.2019 For The 1St To 4Th Quarters For The Financial Year 2013-2014 Relevant To Assessment Year 2014-2015, For The 1St To 4Th Quarters For The Financial Year 2014- 2015 Relevant To Assessment Year 2015-2016 & For The 3Rd & 4Th Quarters For The Financial Year 2015-2016 Relevant To Assessment Year 2016-2017, Respectively

assessment year prior to 1.6.2015. However, we make it clear that, if any deductor has already paid the fee after intimation received under Section 200A, the aforesaid view will not permit the deductor to reopen the said question unless he has made payment under protest. 23. In view of the aforesaid observation and discussion, since the impugned intimation given

MEDIA ANUPAM LTD.,BERHAMPUR vs. ITO (TDS)-2, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.440 To 449/Ctk/2019 (Ay:2014-2015)( Quarter-1) 26Q (Ay:2014-2015)( Quarter-2) 26Q (Ay:2014-2015) (Quarter-3) 26Q (Ay:2014-2015) (Quarter-4) 26Q (Ay:2015-2016) (Quarter-1) 26Q (Ay:2015-2016) (Quarter-2) 26Q (Ay:2015-2016) (Quarter-3) 26Q (Ay:2015-2016) (Quarter-4) 26Q (Ay:2016-2017) (Quarter-3) 26Q (Ay:2016-2017) (Quarter-4) 26Q Media Anupam Ltd. Vs. Ito(Tds)-2, Bhubaneswar Panchsheela Marg, Industrial Estate, Berhampur-760008 Pan No. Aabcm 2118 B, Tanno. : Bbnm00762G (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधाारिती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri A.K.Padhy, Fca िाजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri J.K.Lenka, Dr सुनवाई की तािीख / Date Of Hearing : 24/02/2020 घोषणा की तािीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 25/02/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : These Are The Ten Appeals Have Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Cit(A)-1, Bhubaneswar All Dated 25.09.2019 For The 1St To 4Th Quarters For The Financial Year 2013-2014 Relevant To Assessment Year 2014-2015, For The 1St To 4Th Quarters For The Financial Year 2014- 2015 Relevant To Assessment Year 2015-2016 & For The 3Rd & 4Th Quarters For The Financial Year 2015-2016 Relevant To Assessment Year 2016-2017, Respectively

assessment year prior to 1.6.2015. However, we make it clear that, if any deductor has already paid the fee after intimation received under Section 200A, the aforesaid view will not permit the deductor to reopen the said question unless he has made payment under protest. 23. In view of the aforesaid observation and discussion, since the impugned intimation given

MEDIA ANUPAM LTD.,BERHAMPUR vs. ITO (TDS)-2, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.440 To 449/Ctk/2019 (Ay:2014-2015)( Quarter-1) 26Q (Ay:2014-2015)( Quarter-2) 26Q (Ay:2014-2015) (Quarter-3) 26Q (Ay:2014-2015) (Quarter-4) 26Q (Ay:2015-2016) (Quarter-1) 26Q (Ay:2015-2016) (Quarter-2) 26Q (Ay:2015-2016) (Quarter-3) 26Q (Ay:2015-2016) (Quarter-4) 26Q (Ay:2016-2017) (Quarter-3) 26Q (Ay:2016-2017) (Quarter-4) 26Q Media Anupam Ltd. Vs. Ito(Tds)-2, Bhubaneswar Panchsheela Marg, Industrial Estate, Berhampur-760008 Pan No. Aabcm 2118 B, Tanno. : Bbnm00762G (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधाारिती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri A.K.Padhy, Fca िाजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri J.K.Lenka, Dr सुनवाई की तािीख / Date Of Hearing : 24/02/2020 घोषणा की तािीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 25/02/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : These Are The Ten Appeals Have Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Cit(A)-1, Bhubaneswar All Dated 25.09.2019 For The 1St To 4Th Quarters For The Financial Year 2013-2014 Relevant To Assessment Year 2014-2015, For The 1St To 4Th Quarters For The Financial Year 2014- 2015 Relevant To Assessment Year 2015-2016 & For The 3Rd & 4Th Quarters For The Financial Year 2015-2016 Relevant To Assessment Year 2016-2017, Respectively

assessment year prior to 1.6.2015. However, we make it clear that, if any deductor has already paid the fee after intimation received under Section 200A, the aforesaid view will not permit the deductor to reopen the said question unless he has made payment under protest. 23. In view of the aforesaid observation and discussion, since the impugned intimation given

MEDIA ANUPAM LTD.,BERHAMPUR vs. ITO (TDS)-2, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.440 To 449/Ctk/2019 (Ay:2014-2015)( Quarter-1) 26Q (Ay:2014-2015)( Quarter-2) 26Q (Ay:2014-2015) (Quarter-3) 26Q (Ay:2014-2015) (Quarter-4) 26Q (Ay:2015-2016) (Quarter-1) 26Q (Ay:2015-2016) (Quarter-2) 26Q (Ay:2015-2016) (Quarter-3) 26Q (Ay:2015-2016) (Quarter-4) 26Q (Ay:2016-2017) (Quarter-3) 26Q (Ay:2016-2017) (Quarter-4) 26Q Media Anupam Ltd. Vs. Ito(Tds)-2, Bhubaneswar Panchsheela Marg, Industrial Estate, Berhampur-760008 Pan No. Aabcm 2118 B, Tanno. : Bbnm00762G (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधाारिती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri A.K.Padhy, Fca िाजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri J.K.Lenka, Dr सुनवाई की तािीख / Date Of Hearing : 24/02/2020 घोषणा की तािीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 25/02/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : These Are The Ten Appeals Have Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Cit(A)-1, Bhubaneswar All Dated 25.09.2019 For The 1St To 4Th Quarters For The Financial Year 2013-2014 Relevant To Assessment Year 2014-2015, For The 1St To 4Th Quarters For The Financial Year 2014- 2015 Relevant To Assessment Year 2015-2016 & For The 3Rd & 4Th Quarters For The Financial Year 2015-2016 Relevant To Assessment Year 2016-2017, Respectively

assessment year prior to 1.6.2015. However, we make it clear that, if any deductor has already paid the fee after intimation received under Section 200A, the aforesaid view will not permit the deductor to reopen the said question unless he has made payment under protest. 23. In view of the aforesaid observation and discussion, since the impugned intimation given

MEDIA ANUPAM LTD.,BERHAMPUR vs. ITO (TDS)-2, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita Nos.440 To 449/Ctk/2019 (Ay:2014-2015)( Quarter-1) 26Q (Ay:2014-2015)( Quarter-2) 26Q (Ay:2014-2015) (Quarter-3) 26Q (Ay:2014-2015) (Quarter-4) 26Q (Ay:2015-2016) (Quarter-1) 26Q (Ay:2015-2016) (Quarter-2) 26Q (Ay:2015-2016) (Quarter-3) 26Q (Ay:2015-2016) (Quarter-4) 26Q (Ay:2016-2017) (Quarter-3) 26Q (Ay:2016-2017) (Quarter-4) 26Q Media Anupam Ltd. Vs. Ito(Tds)-2, Bhubaneswar Panchsheela Marg, Industrial Estate, Berhampur-760008 Pan No. Aabcm 2118 B, Tanno. : Bbnm00762G (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधाारिती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri A.K.Padhy, Fca िाजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri J.K.Lenka, Dr सुनवाई की तािीख / Date Of Hearing : 24/02/2020 घोषणा की तािीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 25/02/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : These Are The Ten Appeals Have Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Cit(A)-1, Bhubaneswar All Dated 25.09.2019 For The 1St To 4Th Quarters For The Financial Year 2013-2014 Relevant To Assessment Year 2014-2015, For The 1St To 4Th Quarters For The Financial Year 2014- 2015 Relevant To Assessment Year 2015-2016 & For The 3Rd & 4Th Quarters For The Financial Year 2015-2016 Relevant To Assessment Year 2016-2017, Respectively

assessment year prior to 1.6.2015. However, we make it clear that, if any deductor has already paid the fee after intimation received under Section 200A, the aforesaid view will not permit the deductor to reopen the said question unless he has made payment under protest. 23. In view of the aforesaid observation and discussion, since the impugned intimation given