Search: TDS | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

74 results for “TDS”+ Condonation of Delayclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai1,004 Mumbai664 Patna615 Delhi610 Pune595 Bangalore491 Kolkata297 Nagpur245 Hyderabad235 Raipur211 Cochin159 Chandigarh154 Jaipur143 Ahmedabad116 Visakhapatnam83 Cuttack74 Surat62 Lucknow61 Karnataka54 Indore48 Rajkot35 Amritsar27 Dehradun23 Kerala23 Panaji16 Agra12 Jodhpur11 Guwahati10 Varanasi9 Jabalpur9 Ranchi7 SC7 Allahabad6 Telangana2 Rajasthan1 Calcutta1

Key Topics

TDS66 Section 26362 Limitation/Time-bar39 Condonation of Delay33 Addition to Income25 Section 11(2)16 Section 4014 Penalty14 Section 270A13 Section 271A

DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER CON. EAST COAST RAILWAY,JAJPUR vs. ITO, WARD TDS, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 793/CTK/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Feb 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

condonation of delay before the ld. CIT(A), it was only mentioned that “the appellant was unknown and not aware for appeal of TDS

DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER CON. EAST COAST RAILWAY,JAJPUR vs. ITO, WARD TDS, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 796/CTK/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Feb 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

condonation of delay before the ld. CIT(A), it was only mentioned that “the appellant was unknown and not aware for appeal of TDS

Showing 1–20 of 74 · Page 1 of 4

13

DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER CON. EAST COAST RAILWAY,JAJPUR vs. ITO, WARD TDS, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 795/CTK/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Feb 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

condonation of delay before the ld. CIT(A), it was only mentioned that “the appellant was unknown and not aware for appeal of TDS

DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER CON. EAST COAST RAILWAY,JAJPUR vs. ITO, WARD TDS , CUUTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 786/CTK/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Feb 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

condonation of delay before the ld. CIT(A), it was only mentioned that “the appellant was unknown and not aware for appeal of TDS

DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER CON. EAST COAST RAILWAY,JAJPUR vs. ITO, WARD TDS , CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 792/CTK/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Feb 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

condonation of delay before the ld. CIT(A), it was only mentioned that “the appellant was unknown and not aware for appeal of TDS

DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER CON. EAST COAST RAILWAY,JAJPUR vs. ITO, WARD TDS , CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 783/CTK/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Feb 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

condonation of delay before the ld. CIT(A), it was only mentioned that “the appellant was unknown and not aware for appeal of TDS

DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER CON. EAST COAST RAILWAY,JAJPUR vs. ITO, WARD TDS, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 790/CTK/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Feb 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

condonation of delay before the ld. CIT(A), it was only mentioned that “the appellant was unknown and not aware for appeal of TDS

DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER CON. EAST COAST RAILWAY,JAJPUR vs. ITO, WARD TDS, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 781/CTK/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Feb 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

condonation of delay before the ld. CIT(A), it was only mentioned that “the appellant was unknown and not aware for appeal of TDS

DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER CON. EAST COAST RAILWAY,JAJPUR vs. ITO , WARD TDS, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 788/CTK/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Feb 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

condonation of delay before the ld. CIT(A), it was only mentioned that “the appellant was unknown and not aware for appeal of TDS

DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER CON. EAST COAST RAILWAY,JAJPUR vs. ITO, WARD TDS, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 780/CTK/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Feb 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

condonation of delay before the ld. CIT(A), it was only mentioned that “the appellant was unknown and not aware for appeal of TDS

DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER CON. EAST COAST RAILWAY,JAJPUR vs. ITO, WARD TDS, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 787/CTK/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Feb 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

condonation of delay before the ld. CIT(A), it was only mentioned that “the appellant was unknown and not aware for appeal of TDS

DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER CON. EAST COAST RAILWAY,JAJPUR vs. ITO, WARD TDS, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 789/CTK/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Feb 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

condonation of delay before the ld. CIT(A), it was only mentioned that “the appellant was unknown and not aware for appeal of TDS

DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER CON. EAST COAST RAILWAY,JAJPUR vs. ITO, WARD TDS,, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 782/CTK/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Feb 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

condonation of delay before the ld. CIT(A), it was only mentioned that “the appellant was unknown and not aware for appeal of TDS

DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER CON. EAST COAST RAILWAY,JAJPUR vs. ITO, WARD TDS, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 785/CTK/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Feb 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

condonation of delay before the ld. CIT(A), it was only mentioned that “the appellant was unknown and not aware for appeal of TDS

DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER CON. EAST COAST RAILWAY,JAJPUR vs. ITO, WARD TDS, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 791/CTK/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Feb 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

condonation of delay before the ld. CIT(A), it was only mentioned that “the appellant was unknown and not aware for appeal of TDS

DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER CON. EAST COAST RAILWAY,JAJPUR vs. ITO, WARD TDS, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 794/CTK/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Feb 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

condonation of delay before the ld. CIT(A), it was only mentioned that “the appellant was unknown and not aware for appeal of TDS

DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER CON. EAST COAST RAILWAY,JAJPUR vs. ITO, WARD TDS, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 784/CTK/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack18 Feb 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

condonation of delay before the ld. CIT(A), it was only mentioned that “the appellant was unknown and not aware for appeal of TDS

M/S. B.K. JENA & ASSOCIATES,KUJANG vs. PR. CIT, CUTTACK

In the result, appeal of the assessee stands partly allowed

ITA 365/CTK/2019[2014-15]Status: HeardITAT Cuttack16 Sept 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Before S/Shri George Mathan, Judicial & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpiaassessment Year : 2014-15 M/S. B.K.Jena & Associates, M/S. B.K.Jena & Associates, Vs. Pr. Cit, Cuttack Pr. Cit, Cuttack Rangiagarh, Rangiagarh, Jhimani, Jhimani, Kujang, Kujang, Jagatsinghpur Jagatsinghpur Pan/Gir No. No.Aagfb 4157 P (Appellant (Appellant) .. ( Respondent Respondent) Assessee By : Shri P.R.Mohanty P.R.Mohanty, Ar Revenue By : Shri M.K.Gautam, Cit ( Cit (Dr) Date Of Hearing : 16/9/ 20 / 2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 16/ /9/2022 O R D E R Per Bench

For Appellant: Shri P.R.MohantyFor Respondent: Shri M.K.Gautam, CIT (

condone the delay. 8. On merits, ld AR drew our attention to the assessment order passed u/s.143(3) of the Act dated 27.12.2016 at para 1 of the assessment order to submit that this was a case of “Limited Scrutiny” under CASS. It was the submission that in the limited scrutiny, the notice issued u/s.142(1) categorically asked

BHUBANESWAR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION,BHUBANESWAR vs. DCIT, TDS CIRCLE, BHUBANESWAR, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 690/CTK/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack23 Dec 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl. Reddy(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumarआयकर अपील सं/Ita No.685/Ctk/2025:("नधा"रण वष" / Asst Year:2018-19) आयकर अपील सं/Ita No.686/Ctk/2025:("नधा"रण वष" / Asst Year:2019-20) आयकर अपील सं/Ita No.687/Ctk/2025:("नधा"रण वष" / Asst Year:2020-21) आयकर अपील सं/Ita No.688/Ctk/2025:("नधा"रण वष" / Asst Year:2020-21) आयकर अपील सं/Ita No.690/Ctk/2025:("नधा"रण वष" / Asst Year:2017-18) आयकर अपील सं/Ita No.691/Ctk/2025:("नधा"रण वष" / Asst Year:2022-23) Bhubaneswar Muncipal Vs Dcit, Tds Circle, Bhubaneswar Corporation, Icomc Tower, Infront Of Satya Nagar Kali Temple, Unit- Ix, Bhubaneswar Pan No. : Aaalb 0487 C (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) .. (""यथ" / Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Rajat Kr Kar, Adv राज"व क" ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Vijaya Singh, Sr Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 23 /12/2025 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 23 /12/2025

For Appellant: Shri Rajat Kr Kar, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Vijaya Singh, Sr DR

condone the delay in filing the appeals before the first appellate authority and direct him to decide the issues on merits, after giving effective opportunity of hearing to the assessee within six months 4 Bhubaneswar Muncipal Corporation, from the date of issue of this order. The assessee is also directed to cooperate with the first appellate authority without seeking adjournment

BHUBANESWAR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION,BHUBANESWAR vs. DCIT, TDS CIRCLE, BHUBANESWAR, BHUBANESWAR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 691/CTK/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack23 Dec 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl. Reddy(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumarआयकर अपील सं/Ita No.685/Ctk/2025:("नधा"रण वष" / Asst Year:2018-19) आयकर अपील सं/Ita No.686/Ctk/2025:("नधा"रण वष" / Asst Year:2019-20) आयकर अपील सं/Ita No.687/Ctk/2025:("नधा"रण वष" / Asst Year:2020-21) आयकर अपील सं/Ita No.688/Ctk/2025:("नधा"रण वष" / Asst Year:2020-21) आयकर अपील सं/Ita No.690/Ctk/2025:("नधा"रण वष" / Asst Year:2017-18) आयकर अपील सं/Ita No.691/Ctk/2025:("नधा"रण वष" / Asst Year:2022-23) Bhubaneswar Muncipal Vs Dcit, Tds Circle, Bhubaneswar Corporation, Icomc Tower, Infront Of Satya Nagar Kali Temple, Unit- Ix, Bhubaneswar Pan No. : Aaalb 0487 C (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) .. (""यथ" / Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Rajat Kr Kar, Adv राज"व क" ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Vijaya Singh, Sr Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 23 /12/2025 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 23 /12/2025

For Appellant: Shri Rajat Kr Kar, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Vijaya Singh, Sr DR

condone the delay in filing the appeals before the first appellate authority and direct him to decide the issues on merits, after giving effective opportunity of hearing to the assessee within six months 4 Bhubaneswar Muncipal Corporation, from the date of issue of this order. The assessee is also directed to cooperate with the first appellate authority without seeking adjournment