Search: transfer pricing

2 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 92A(2)(a)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai45 Delhi21 Kolkata11 Chennai9 Bangalore8 Hyderabad7 Pune3 Cuttack3 Cochin2 Ahmedabad2 Indore1 Chandigarh1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)4 Section 92C2 Section 36(1)(viii)2 Section 36(1)(iii)2 Depreciation2 Disallowance2 Addition to Income2 Comparables/TP2 TP Method

M/S.JOY ALUKKAS INDIA P. LTD,COCHIN vs. THE ACIT, COCHIN

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee stands partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 38/COCH/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Sept 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am& Shri Rahul Chaudharyit (Tp) A No. 119/Coch/2016 (Assessment Year: 2011-12) & It (Tp) A Nos. 38 & 643/Coch/2017 (Assessment Years :2012-13 & 2013-14)

For Appellant: Smt. Parvathy Ammal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR

Section 143(3)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 36(1)(viii)Section 92C

transfer pricing provisions are attracted. The DRP failed to note that the assessing authorities had not established that AIRas was an associated enterprise within the meaning of explanation to section 92A(2

M/S.JOY ALUKKAS INDIA P. LTD,COCHIN vs. THE ACIT, COCHIN

M/S.JOY ALUKKAS INDIA P. LTD,COCHIN vs. THE ACIT, COCHIN

M/S.JOY ALUKKAS INDIA P. LTD,TRICHUR vs. THE ACIT, ERNAKULAM