Search: transfer pricing

2 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 92A(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai100 Delhi60 Bangalore49 Kolkata38 Pune31 Chennai27 Hyderabad15 Ahmedabad11 Karnataka9 Jaipur5 Cuttack3 Amritsar2 Cochin2 SC2 Telangana2 Allahabad1 Chandigarh1 Jabalpur1 Guwahati1 Indore1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)4 Section 92C2 Section 36(1)(viii)2 Section 36(1)(iii)2 Depreciation2 Disallowance2 Addition to Income2 Comparables/TP2 TP Method

M/S.JOY ALUKKAS INDIA P. LTD,TRICHUR vs. THE ACIT, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee stands partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 119/COCH/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Sept 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am& Shri Rahul Chaudharyit (Tp) A No. 119/Coch/2016 (Assessment Year: 2011-12) & It (Tp) A Nos. 38 & 643/Coch/2017 (Assessment Years :2012-13 & 2013-14)

For Appellant: Smt. Parvathy Ammal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR

Section 143(3)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 36(1)(viii)Section 92C

transfer pricing provisions are attracted. The DRP failed to note that the assessing authorities had not established that AIRas was an associated enterprise within the meaning of explanation to section 92A(2

M/S.JOY ALUKKAS INDIA P. LTD,TRICHUR vs. THE ACIT, ERNAKULAM

M/S.JOY ALUKKAS INDIA P. LTD,TRICHUR vs. THE ACIT, ERNAKULAM

M/S.JOY ALUKKAS INDIA P. LTD,COCHIN vs. THE ACIT, COCHIN