BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 928clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai156Delhi115Bangalore45Ahmedabad36Kolkata24Hyderabad22Pune20Chennai12Jaipur10Cuttack9Chandigarh8Visakhapatnam4Karnataka3Cochin2Surat2Ranchi1SC1Orissa1Telangana1Indore1

Key Topics

Section 153C4Section 92C3Section 36(1)(iii)2Section 153A2Addition to Income2

M/S.IBS SOFTWARE SERVICES P. LTD,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE DCIT, TRIVANDRUM

ITA 601/COCH/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin13 Nov 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Rajakannan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(5)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 36(1)(va)Section 92C

transfer pricing adjustment in relation to notional interest on (a) loans/advances to AEs, and (b) receivables outstanding from AEs. Ground No. 3 to 7 read as under: 3 Assessment Year 2013-2014 “Imputation of notional interest “3. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the learned AO erred in making and adjustment of INR.292,487,928

SRI. ELDHOSE K. VARGHESE,MUVATTUPUZHA vs. THEDCIT, ERNAKULAM

In the result, appeals for assessment year 2006-07 to 2008-09 and 2010-11 are allowed while the appeals of the assessee for assessment year 2009-10, 2011-12 and 2012-13 are partly allowed

ITA 261/COCH/2016[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Oct 2017AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri P. K. Bansal & Shri George George K.

Section 132Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 153CSection 234A

928 3,00,000 * In the assessment year 2008-09 no ground has been taken in respect of seized cash treated as unexplained i.e. the ground relating to ground No. 4 in assessment year 2006-07 and accordingly the ground taken in those assessment years has been renumbered and in ground No. 6, the figure of Rs.60,000/- be read