BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 53Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi66Bangalore64Mumbai55Hyderabad32Chandigarh20Chennai17Indore13Kolkata11Ahmedabad10Surat10Karnataka6Agra5Pune5Telangana5Jaipur4Cochin4Cuttack3Visakhapatnam2Nagpur2Ranchi1SC1Jabalpur1Calcutta1Amritsar1

Key Topics

Section 53A8Section 805Section 80I4Section 2(47)4Section 1483Section 2632Section 50C2Capital Gains2Addition to Income2

SILLS KARINGATTIL JOSE,NEDUMKANDOM vs. ITO WARD 2, THODUPUZHA

Appeal is partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 132/COCH/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin19 Nov 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singhsils Karingattil Jose Income Tax Officer Np 3/406, Karingattil Ward - 2, House, Munnar Road Thodupuzha Vs. Nedumkandom P.O. [Pan: Afopj8789C] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri P. M. Veeramani, CAFor Respondent: Smt. V. Swarnalatha, Sr. D.R
Section 2(47)Section 2(47)(V)Section 250Section 50CSection 53ASection 56(2)(vii)

53A of the Transfer of Property Act read with section 2(47)(V) of the Income Tax Act were complied in the agreement under reference, and the findings Of the assessing officer and the first appellate authority in this regard are grossly unfounded and incorrect. 8. There being no "transfer" by way of a Joint development agreement in the case

THE ACIT, CIR-1(1), KOCHI, KOCHI vs. SRI.PRINCE JOSEPH, KOCHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 272/COCH/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 Sept 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Smt.A.S.BindhuFor Respondent: Sri.Mathew Joseph
Section 143(3)Section 148Section 2(47)

section 53A of the Transfer Pricing Act and the Registration Act, as amended in the year 2001. Further, the CIT(A) noticed

M/S.TRIO PROPERTY DEVELOPERS P. LTD,CALICUT vs. THE ACIT, CALICUT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 235/COCH/2016[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin07 Jun 2017AY 2006-07

Bench: S/Shri Abraham P. George, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(1)Section 148Section 263Section 53Section 53A

price for the constructed area of 71,444 sq. ft. which was to be delivered to the assessee, as per the agreement was Rs.975 per sq. ft. The Assessing Officer was of the opinion that assessee having handed over the possession of the land, there was a transfer within the meaning of 2(47) of the Act read with section

M/S.ABAD BUILDERS,COCHIN vs. THE ACIT, COCHIN

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is allowed

ITA 185/COCH/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin19 Dec 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Ms. Padmavathy S.Assessment Year : 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri Tinu Anto, CAFor Respondent: Smt. J M Jamuna Devi, Sr. AR
Section 80Section 80I

53A of the Transfer of Property Act would lead to a situation where the land would be for the purpose of Income Tax Act deemed to have been transferred to the assessee. In that view of the Page 7 of 10 matter, for the purpose of income derived from such property, the assessee would be the owner of the land