SULAIKHA CLAY MINES,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM vs. ACIT, CIRCLE 1(2), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
In the result, the appeals for all the years are partly allowed and partly allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 626/COCH/2022[2007-2008]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin31 Aug 2023AY 2007-2008
Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Das
For Appellant: Shri Muhammad Shafeeq A., CAFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 40Section 40A(2)(b)
9 partners, has not been furnished.
In fact, also quizzical in the matter is the wide variations in the claim of salary for each of them over the years, as under, an aspect not explained at all:
(Amount in Rs. lacs)
Name of Partner/AY 2004-05
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2009-10
M. Subara Beevi