SULAIKHA CLAY MINES,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM vs. ACIT, CIRCLE 1(2), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
In the result, the appeals for all the years are partly allowed and partly allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 623/COCH/2022[2004-2005]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin31 Aug 2023AY 2004-2005
Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Das
For Appellant: Shri Muhammad Shafeeq A., CAFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 40Section 40A(2)(b)
transfer from or, as the case may be, to, another working partner – both conspicuous by their absence. The distance of the site from Alappuzha, where only two ladies are said to reside, may be more or less w.r.t. their places of residence for the other three ladies. It is the nature of work, duly exhibited, that would the lead
