BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

149 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 2(47)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi2,211Mumbai2,087Bangalore911Chennai473Ahmedabad406Kolkata387Karnataka349Hyderabad316Jaipur281Pune216Chandigarh193Indore167Cochin149Surat109Calcutta57Visakhapatnam56Rajkot50Lucknow44SC40Telangana39Raipur38Agra30Cuttack27Nagpur26Guwahati22Jodhpur16Amritsar10Rajasthan8Ranchi8Panaji6Kerala5Dehradun5Orissa4Jabalpur4Patna2Allahabad2T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Andhra Pradesh1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1DIPAK MISRA V. GOPALA GOWDA1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1

Key Topics

Section 25090Addition to Income36Section 143(3)19Section 153A10Capital Gains10Section 2638Section 2(24)(vi)8Section 488Section 1327

SILLS KARINGATTIL JOSE,NEDUMKANDOM vs. ITO WARD 2, THODUPUZHA

Appeal is partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 132/COCH/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin19 Nov 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singhsils Karingattil Jose Income Tax Officer Np 3/406, Karingattil Ward - 2, House, Munnar Road Thodupuzha Vs. Nedumkandom P.O. [Pan: Afopj8789C] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri P. M. Veeramani, CAFor Respondent: Smt. V. Swarnalatha, Sr. D.R
Section 2(47)Section 2(47)(V)Section 250Section 50CSection 53ASection 56(2)(vii)

47. Explanation.—For the purposes of this clause,— (a) 'assessable' shall have the meaning assigned to it in the Explanation 2 to sub-section (2) of section 50C ; (b) 'fair market value' of a property, other than an immovable property, means the value determined in accordance with the method as may be prescribed ; (c) 'jewellery' shall have the meaning assigned

Showing 1–20 of 149 · Page 1 of 8

...
Disallowance7
Section 153C6
Transfer Pricing5

THE DCIT, COCHIN vs. M/S.ASPINWALL & CO. LTD, COCHIN

In the result,the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 133/COCH/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin19 May 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

Section 14A

price relating to the buildings, I.T.A. Nos. 60&61/Coch/2015 & 128 & 133/Coch/2017 Plant and Machinery etc. belonging to an estate is never allowed as a revenue expenditure and it is not right on the part of the assessee to categorize the cost of acquisition of a thing as a revenue expenditure and the thing, as a capital asset. Therefore

M/S ASPINWALL & CO.,LTD,COCHIN vs. THE ACIT, COCHIN

In the result,the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 128/COCH/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin19 May 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

Section 14A

price relating to the buildings, I.T.A. Nos. 60&61/Coch/2015 & 128 & 133/Coch/2017 Plant and Machinery etc. belonging to an estate is never allowed as a revenue expenditure and it is not right on the part of the assessee to categorize the cost of acquisition of a thing as a revenue expenditure and the thing, as a capital asset. Therefore

ASPINWALL & COMPANY LTD,COCHIN vs. THE ACIT, COCHIN

In the result,the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 60/COCH/2015[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin19 May 2020AY 2006-07

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

Section 14A

price relating to the buildings, I.T.A. Nos. 60&61/Coch/2015 & 128 & 133/Coch/2017 Plant and Machinery etc. belonging to an estate is never allowed as a revenue expenditure and it is not right on the part of the assessee to categorize the cost of acquisition of a thing as a revenue expenditure and the thing, as a capital asset. Therefore

ASPINWALL & COMPANY LTD,COCHIN vs. THE ACIT, COCHIN

In the result,the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 61/COCH/2015[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin19 May 2020AY 2006-07

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

Section 14A

price relating to the buildings, I.T.A. Nos. 60&61/Coch/2015 & 128 & 133/Coch/2017 Plant and Machinery etc. belonging to an estate is never allowed as a revenue expenditure and it is not right on the part of the assessee to categorize the cost of acquisition of a thing as a revenue expenditure and the thing, as a capital asset. Therefore

CARMEL EDUCATIONAL TRUST,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. DCIT,CEN- CIRCLE,, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 308/COCH/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

2(47) of the Act. Hence, it was submitted that consideration if any, received or receivable in lieu of relinquishment of a capital asset or extinguishment of any right therein would constitute capital receipt only and not revenue receipt. It was submitted that the profits and gains arising from the transfer was, therefore, required to be computed under the head

SRI.JOSE THOMAS,ADOOR vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 28/COCH/2019[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

2(47) of the Act. Hence, it was submitted that consideration if any, received or receivable in lieu of relinquishment of a capital asset or extinguishment of any right therein would constitute capital receipt only and not revenue receipt. It was submitted that the profits and gains arising from the transfer was, therefore, required to be computed under the head

SRI.JOSE THOMAS,ADOOR vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 31/COCH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

2(47) of the Act. Hence, it was submitted that consideration if any, received or receivable in lieu of relinquishment of a capital asset or extinguishment of any right therein would constitute capital receipt only and not revenue receipt. It was submitted that the profits and gains arising from the transfer was, therefore, required to be computed under the head

SRI.JOSE THOMAS,ADOOR vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 29/COCH/2019[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

2(47) of the Act. Hence, it was submitted that consideration if any, received or receivable in lieu of relinquishment of a capital asset or extinguishment of any right therein would constitute capital receipt only and not revenue receipt. It was submitted that the profits and gains arising from the transfer was, therefore, required to be computed under the head

CARMEL EDUCATIONAL TRUST,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. DCIT, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 304/COCH/2019[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2004-05

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

2(47) of the Act. Hence, it was submitted that consideration if any, received or receivable in lieu of relinquishment of a capital asset or extinguishment of any right therein would constitute capital receipt only and not revenue receipt. It was submitted that the profits and gains arising from the transfer was, therefore, required to be computed under the head

SMT.GRACY BABU,ADOOR P.O. vs. THE DCIT CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 33/COCH/2019[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

2(47) of the Act. Hence, it was submitted that consideration if any, received or receivable in lieu of relinquishment of a capital asset or extinguishment of any right therein would constitute capital receipt only and not revenue receipt. It was submitted that the profits and gains arising from the transfer was, therefore, required to be computed under the head

CARMEL EDUCATIONAL TRUST,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. DCIT,CEN- CIRCLE,, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 309/COCH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

2(47) of the Act. Hence, it was submitted that consideration if any, received or receivable in lieu of relinquishment of a capital asset or extinguishment of any right therein would constitute capital receipt only and not revenue receipt. It was submitted that the profits and gains arising from the transfer was, therefore, required to be computed under the head

SMT.GRACY BABU,ADOOR P.O. vs. THE DCIT CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 34/COCH/2019[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

2(47) of the Act. Hence, it was submitted that consideration if any, received or receivable in lieu of relinquishment of a capital asset or extinguishment of any right therein would constitute capital receipt only and not revenue receipt. It was submitted that the profits and gains arising from the transfer was, therefore, required to be computed under the head

CARMEL EDUCATIONAL TRUST,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. DCIT,CEN- CIRCLE,, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 305/COCH/2019[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

2(47) of the Act. Hence, it was submitted that consideration if any, received or receivable in lieu of relinquishment of a capital asset or extinguishment of any right therein would constitute capital receipt only and not revenue receipt. It was submitted that the profits and gains arising from the transfer was, therefore, required to be computed under the head

SRI.JOSE THOMAS,ADOOR vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 30/COCH/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

2(47) of the Act. Hence, it was submitted that consideration if any, received or receivable in lieu of relinquishment of a capital asset or extinguishment of any right therein would constitute capital receipt only and not revenue receipt. It was submitted that the profits and gains arising from the transfer was, therefore, required to be computed under the head

MRS.GRACY BABU,ADOOR P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 210/COCH/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

2(47) of the Act. Hence, it was submitted that consideration if any, received or receivable in lieu of relinquishment of a capital asset or extinguishment of any right therein would constitute capital receipt only and not revenue receipt. It was submitted that the profits and gains arising from the transfer was, therefore, required to be computed under the head

SRI.JOSE THOMAS,ADOOR P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA vs. THE ACIT,CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 213/COCH/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

2(47) of the Act. Hence, it was submitted that consideration if any, received or receivable in lieu of relinquishment of a capital asset or extinguishment of any right therein would constitute capital receipt only and not revenue receipt. It was submitted that the profits and gains arising from the transfer was, therefore, required to be computed under the head

THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM vs. SRI.JOSE THOMAS, ADOOR

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 238/COCH/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

2(47) of the Act. Hence, it was submitted that consideration if any, received or receivable in lieu of relinquishment of a capital asset or extinguishment of any right therein would constitute capital receipt only and not revenue receipt. It was submitted that the profits and gains arising from the transfer was, therefore, required to be computed under the head

THE ACIT CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM vs. SMT.GRACY BABU, ADOOR P.O.

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 239/COCH/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

2(47) of the Act. Hence, it was submitted that consideration if any, received or receivable in lieu of relinquishment of a capital asset or extinguishment of any right therein would constitute capital receipt only and not revenue receipt. It was submitted that the profits and gains arising from the transfer was, therefore, required to be computed under the head

CARMEL EDUCATIONAL TRUST,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. DCIT,CEN- CIRCLE,, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 310/COCH/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

2(47) of the Act. Hence, it was submitted that consideration if any, received or receivable in lieu of relinquishment of a capital asset or extinguishment of any right therein would constitute capital receipt only and not revenue receipt. It was submitted that the profits and gains arising from the transfer was, therefore, required to be computed under the head