BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

39 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 197clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi374Mumbai333Karnataka251Jaipur86Bangalore84Hyderabad73Chennai68Chandigarh66Ahmedabad58Kolkata57Cochin39Indore35Pune25Raipur23Lucknow18Calcutta16Surat10Amritsar10Telangana9Varanasi9Jodhpur7SC6Nagpur5Cuttack3Allahabad3Rajkot3Rajasthan3Patna1Punjab & Haryana1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Addition to Income31Section 153A15Section 143(3)12Section 13212Section 2(24)(vi)8Section 488Capital Gains8Section 133A6Section 53A6

SILLS KARINGATTIL JOSE,NEDUMKANDOM vs. ITO WARD 2, THODUPUZHA

Appeal is partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 132/COCH/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin19 Nov 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singhsils Karingattil Jose Income Tax Officer Np 3/406, Karingattil Ward - 2, House, Munnar Road Thodupuzha Vs. Nedumkandom P.O. [Pan: Afopj8789C] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri P. M. Veeramani, CAFor Respondent: Smt. V. Swarnalatha, Sr. D.R
Section 2(47)Section 2(47)(V)Section 250Section 50CSection 53ASection 56(2)(vii)

197 (Delhi). ###[2019] 112 taxmann.com 71 (Visakhapatnam). *#[2020] 119 taxmann.com 362 (Jaipur). #*[2021] 92 ITR (Trib) 332 (Mumbai); [2022] 136 taxmann.com 42 (Mumbai). #*#[2022] 139 taxmann.com 286 (Jaipur). Page No : 0641 case is that of creation, whereas, the second is that of "transfer" entitled to the right in action. 18. In view of the above, the provisions of section

Showing 1–20 of 39 · Page 1 of 2

Section 92C5
Survey u/s 133A3
Charitable Trust3

APOLLO TYRES LTD.,COCHIN vs. DCIT CORPORATE CIR 1(1), KOCHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 679/COCH/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin10 Sept 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Rahul Chaudhary, Jm Assessment Year: 2020-21 Apollo Tyres Ltd. .......... Appellant 3Rd Floor, Areekal Mansion, Panampilly Nagar, Kochi 682036 [Pan: Aaaca6990Q] Vs. Acit, Corporate Circle-1(1), Kochi ......... Respondent Assessee By: Shri Abraham Joseph Markos, Adv. Revenue By: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing: 20.08.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 10.09.2025

For Appellant: Shri Abraham Joseph Markos, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 154Section 35Section 92C

transfer pricing adjustment of Rs. 3.07.02.519% on Cost-to-Cost Recovery of Salary expenses from AEs a. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. AO/TPO/DRP grossly erred in not appreciating that the recovery of salary expenses of Rs. 14,38,73,097/- (which was rectified by Ld. TPO vide its Order

M/S.APOLLO TYRES LTD,COCHIN vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX, COCHIN

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 609/COCH/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin01 Sept 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Rahul Chaudhary, Jm Assessment Year: 2013-14 Apollo Tyres Ltd. .......... Appellant 3Rd Floor, Areekal Mansion, Panampilly Nagar, Kochi 682036 [Pan: Aaaca6990Q] Vs. Dcit, Corporate Circle-1(1), Kochi ......... Respondent Assessee By: Shri Abraham Joseph Markos, Adv. Revenue By: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing: 20.08.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 01.09.2025

For Appellant: Shri Abraham Joseph Markos, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 32Section 32(1)(iia)Section 35Section 43(1)Section 92C

transfer pricing addition of Rs. 9,57,364/- to the income of the Assessee and holding that the international transactions pertaining to provision of corporate IT services do not satisfy the arm's length principle envisaged under the Act. 12.3 On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. AO/Ld. ΤΡΟ grossly erred

THE ACIT CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM vs. SMT.GRACY BABU, ADOOR P.O.

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 239/COCH/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

price received on sale of agriculture land @Rs.10,40,400/- for 5 Acres. 11.1 Against this, the assessee is in appeal before us.The Ld. AR submitted that the assessee had transferred the agriculture land owned through a registered document in which the value per acre was fixed at Rs.25,40,470/-. Hence, it was submitted that no part of consideration

SMT.GRACY BABU,ADOOR P.O. vs. THE DCIT CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 34/COCH/2019[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

price received on sale of agriculture land @Rs.10,40,400/- for 5 Acres. 11.1 Against this, the assessee is in appeal before us.The Ld. AR submitted that the assessee had transferred the agriculture land owned through a registered document in which the value per acre was fixed at Rs.25,40,470/-. Hence, it was submitted that no part of consideration

CARMEL EDUCATIONAL TRUST,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. DCIT, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 304/COCH/2019[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2004-05

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

price received on sale of agriculture land @Rs.10,40,400/- for 5 Acres. 11.1 Against this, the assessee is in appeal before us.The Ld. AR submitted that the assessee had transferred the agriculture land owned through a registered document in which the value per acre was fixed at Rs.25,40,470/-. Hence, it was submitted that no part of consideration

SMT.GRACY BABU,ADOOR P.O. vs. THE DCIT CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 33/COCH/2019[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

price received on sale of agriculture land @Rs.10,40,400/- for 5 Acres. 11.1 Against this, the assessee is in appeal before us.The Ld. AR submitted that the assessee had transferred the agriculture land owned through a registered document in which the value per acre was fixed at Rs.25,40,470/-. Hence, it was submitted that no part of consideration

SRI.JOSE THOMAS,ADOOR vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 29/COCH/2019[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

price received on sale of agriculture land @Rs.10,40,400/- for 5 Acres. 11.1 Against this, the assessee is in appeal before us.The Ld. AR submitted that the assessee had transferred the agriculture land owned through a registered document in which the value per acre was fixed at Rs.25,40,470/-. Hence, it was submitted that no part of consideration

CARMEL EDUCATIONAL TRUST,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. DCIT,CEN- CIRCLE,, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 306/COCH/2019[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

price received on sale of agriculture land @Rs.10,40,400/- for 5 Acres. 11.1 Against this, the assessee is in appeal before us.The Ld. AR submitted that the assessee had transferred the agriculture land owned through a registered document in which the value per acre was fixed at Rs.25,40,470/-. Hence, it was submitted that no part of consideration

THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM vs. SRI.JOSE THOMAS, ADOOR

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 238/COCH/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

price received on sale of agriculture land @Rs.10,40,400/- for 5 Acres. 11.1 Against this, the assessee is in appeal before us.The Ld. AR submitted that the assessee had transferred the agriculture land owned through a registered document in which the value per acre was fixed at Rs.25,40,470/-. Hence, it was submitted that no part of consideration

CARMEL EDUCATIONAL TRUST,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. DCIT,CEN- CIRCLE,, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 310/COCH/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

price received on sale of agriculture land @Rs.10,40,400/- for 5 Acres. 11.1 Against this, the assessee is in appeal before us.The Ld. AR submitted that the assessee had transferred the agriculture land owned through a registered document in which the value per acre was fixed at Rs.25,40,470/-. Hence, it was submitted that no part of consideration

CARMEL EDUCATIONAL TRUST,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. DCIT,CEN- CIRCLE,, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 305/COCH/2019[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

price received on sale of agriculture land @Rs.10,40,400/- for 5 Acres. 11.1 Against this, the assessee is in appeal before us.The Ld. AR submitted that the assessee had transferred the agriculture land owned through a registered document in which the value per acre was fixed at Rs.25,40,470/-. Hence, it was submitted that no part of consideration

SRI.JOSE THOMAS,ADOOR vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 28/COCH/2019[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

price received on sale of agriculture land @Rs.10,40,400/- for 5 Acres. 11.1 Against this, the assessee is in appeal before us.The Ld. AR submitted that the assessee had transferred the agriculture land owned through a registered document in which the value per acre was fixed at Rs.25,40,470/-. Hence, it was submitted that no part of consideration

CARMEL EDUCATIONAL TRUST,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. DCIT,CEN- CIRCLE,, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 308/COCH/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

price received on sale of agriculture land @Rs.10,40,400/- for 5 Acres. 11.1 Against this, the assessee is in appeal before us.The Ld. AR submitted that the assessee had transferred the agriculture land owned through a registered document in which the value per acre was fixed at Rs.25,40,470/-. Hence, it was submitted that no part of consideration

SMT.GRACY BABU,ADOOR P.O. vs. THE DCIT CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 35/COCH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

price received on sale of agriculture land @Rs.10,40,400/- for 5 Acres. 11.1 Against this, the assessee is in appeal before us.The Ld. AR submitted that the assessee had transferred the agriculture land owned through a registered document in which the value per acre was fixed at Rs.25,40,470/-. Hence, it was submitted that no part of consideration

THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM vs. SRI.JOSE THOMAS, ADOOR

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 55/COCH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

price received on sale of agriculture land @Rs.10,40,400/- for 5 Acres. 11.1 Against this, the assessee is in appeal before us.The Ld. AR submitted that the assessee had transferred the agriculture land owned through a registered document in which the value per acre was fixed at Rs.25,40,470/-. Hence, it was submitted that no part of consideration

SRI.JOSE THOMAS,ADOOR vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 30/COCH/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

price received on sale of agriculture land @Rs.10,40,400/- for 5 Acres. 11.1 Against this, the assessee is in appeal before us.The Ld. AR submitted that the assessee had transferred the agriculture land owned through a registered document in which the value per acre was fixed at Rs.25,40,470/-. Hence, it was submitted that no part of consideration

SRI.JOSE THOMAS,ADOOR vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 31/COCH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

price received on sale of agriculture land @Rs.10,40,400/- for 5 Acres. 11.1 Against this, the assessee is in appeal before us.The Ld. AR submitted that the assessee had transferred the agriculture land owned through a registered document in which the value per acre was fixed at Rs.25,40,470/-. Hence, it was submitted that no part of consideration

THE DCIT CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM vs. SMT.GRACY BABU, ADOOR P.O.

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 54/COCH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

price received on sale of agriculture land @Rs.10,40,400/- for 5 Acres. 11.1 Against this, the assessee is in appeal before us.The Ld. AR submitted that the assessee had transferred the agriculture land owned through a registered document in which the value per acre was fixed at Rs.25,40,470/-. Hence, it was submitted that no part of consideration

SRI.JOSE THOMAS,ADOOR P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA vs. THE ACIT,CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 213/COCH/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

price received on sale of agriculture land @Rs.10,40,400/- for 5 Acres. 11.1 Against this, the assessee is in appeal before us.The Ld. AR submitted that the assessee had transferred the agriculture land owned through a registered document in which the value per acre was fixed at Rs.25,40,470/-. Hence, it was submitted that no part of consideration