COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LIMITED,COCHIN vs. DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(1), COCHIN

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

195 of the Act as against the\npayments made to the said two entities on the ground that the said non\nresidents have business connection in India. The assessee's appeal was also\ndismissed by the Ld.CIT(A). Thereafter the assessee filed an appeal before\nthe Tribunal and the Tribunal also vide its order dated 12/01/2016 in ITA\nNos

COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LIMITED,COCHIN vs. DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(1), COCHIN

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

195 of the Act as against the\npayments made to the said two entities on the ground that the said non\nresidents have business connection in India. The assessee's appeal was also\ndismissed by the Ld.CIT(A). Thereafter the assessee filed an appeal before\nthe Tribunal and the Tribunal also vide its order dated 12/01/2016 in ITA\nNos

COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LIMITED,COCHIN vs. DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(1), COCHIN

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Soundararajan K.

195 of the Act as against the payments made to the said two entities on the ground that the said non residents have business connection in India. The assessee’s appeal was also dismissed by the Ld.CIT(A). Thereafter the assessee filed an appeal before the Tribunal and the Tribunal also vide its order dated 12/01/2016

COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LIMITED,COCHIN vs. DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(1), COCHIN

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Soundararajan K.

195 of the Act as against the payments made to the said two entities on the ground that the said non residents have business connection in India. The assessee’s appeal was also dismissed by the Ld.CIT(A). Thereafter the assessee filed an appeal before the Tribunal and the Tribunal also vide its order dated 12/01/2016

COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LIMITED,COCHIN vs. DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(1), COCHIN

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Soundararajan K.

195 of the Act as against the payments made to the said two entities on the ground that the said non residents have business connection in India. The assessee’s appeal was also dismissed by the Ld.CIT(A). Thereafter the assessee filed an appeal before the Tribunal and the Tribunal also vide its order dated 12/01/2016

INFOPARKS KERALA,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE JT DIRECTOR OF IT (OSD) EXEM), COCHIN

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are partly allowed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Am & Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm

transferred to the assessee-society on 18.9.2003. Built-up space for IT and ITES was to be set-up thereat, targeted at 7.5 lakh sq.ft. annually for the first two years, increasing upto an additional 15 lakh sq.ft. per annum for the next three years. The additional capacity was envisaged to be created by enjoining private sector participation, including through

INFOPARKS KERALA,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE JT DIRECTOR OF IT (OSD) EXEM), COCHIN

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are partly allowed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Am & Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm

transferred to the assessee-society on 18.9.2003. Built-up space for IT and ITES was to be set-up thereat, targeted at 7.5 lakh sq.ft. annually for the first two years, increasing upto an additional 15 lakh sq.ft. per annum for the next three years. The additional capacity was envisaged to be created by enjoining private sector participation, including through

INFOPARKS KERALA,COCHIN vs. THE ACIT, COCHIN

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are partly allowed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Am & Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm

transferred to the assessee-society on 18.9.2003. Built-up space for IT and ITES was to be set-up thereat, targeted at 7.5 lakh sq.ft. annually for the first two years, increasing upto an additional 15 lakh sq.ft. per annum for the next three years. The additional capacity was envisaged to be created by enjoining private sector participation, including through