BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 12Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi58Mumbai40Pune21Bangalore18Ahmedabad18Lucknow15Jaipur14Visakhapatnam12Hyderabad7Indore5Cochin4Cuttack3Agra3Chandigarh3Rajkot3Allahabad3Nagpur3Kolkata2Jodhpur2Chennai2

Key Topics

Section 2(15)22Section 116Section 12A4Section 2634Exemption4Section 143(3)2Section 82Section 252Section 143(2)2

MALANADU FARMERS SOCIETY ,KOTTAYAM vs. DCIT EXEMPTIONS, TVM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

The appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 632/COCH/2022[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Mar 2023AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri George George K. & Ms. Padmavathy S.

For Appellant: Shri Jose Kappan, CAFor Respondent: Shri Prashant V.K., CIT(DR)
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 2(15)Section 263

12A of the Act. The assessee filed return of income for AY 2017-18 on 31.10.2017 returning NIL income. The case was selected for scrutiny under CASS and notice u/s 143(2) was duly served on the assessee. The AO called for various details and based on the same completed the assessment accepting the income returned by the assessee. Subsequently

MALANADU MILK PRODUCERS SOCIETY,KOTTAYAM vs. DCIT, EXEMPTION, TVM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

The appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 633/COCH/2022[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Mar 2023AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri George George K. & Ms. Padmavathy S.

For Appellant: Shri Jose Kappan, CAFor Respondent: Shri Prashant V.K., CIT(DR)
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 2(15)Section 263

12A of the Act. The assessee filed return of income for AY 2017-18 on 31.10.2017 returning NIL income. The case was selected for scrutiny under CASS and notice u/s 143(2) was duly served on the assessee. The AO called for various details and based on the same completed the assessment accepting the income returned by the assessee. Subsequently

BIOWIN AGRO RESEARCH,MANANTHAWADY vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, KOZHIKODE

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are dismissed

ITA 2/COCH/2022[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin24 Feb 2023AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon’Ble & Shri Sandeep Gosain, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Ms. Krishna. K, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 2(15)Section 25Section 8

section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’ hereinafter), vide orders dated 30/10/2021 & 08/11/2021 for the two consecutive years respectively 2. The issue arising in the instant case is the denial of exemption u/s. 11 of the Act to the assessee, a company formed and registered u/s. 8 of the Companies Act, 2013 (corresponding

BIOWIN AGRO RESEARCH,MANANTHAWADY vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, KOZHIKODE

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are dismissed

ITA 3/COCH/2022[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin24 Feb 2023AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon’Ble & Shri Sandeep Gosain, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Ms. Krishna. K, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 2(15)Section 25Section 8

section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’ hereinafter), vide orders dated 30/10/2021 & 08/11/2021 for the two consecutive years respectively 2. The issue arising in the instant case is the denial of exemption u/s. 11 of the Act to the assessee, a company formed and registered u/s. 8 of the Companies Act, 2013 (corresponding