BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

20 results for “section 68”+ Short Term Capital Gainsclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,080Delhi1,402Bangalore553Ahmedabad500Kolkata423Chennai395Jaipur385Hyderabad184Indore166Karnataka145Chandigarh142Surat133Pune133Raipur80Nagpur73Agra68Calcutta58Rajkot54Lucknow50Visakhapatnam43Cuttack41Guwahati38Panaji31Amritsar23Cochin20SC17Ranchi16Jodhpur13Telangana9Patna8Dehradun8Kerala6Jabalpur6Allahabad4Rajasthan4Andhra Pradesh1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Orissa1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)22Section 14A18Section 3612Section 153C12Disallowance12Section 13211Section 26310Section 4010Addition to Income9Section 147

M/S.APOLLO TYRES LTD,COCHIN vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX, COCHIN

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 609/COCH/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin01 Sept 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Rahul Chaudhary, Jm Assessment Year: 2013-14 Apollo Tyres Ltd. .......... Appellant 3Rd Floor, Areekal Mansion, Panampilly Nagar, Kochi 682036 [Pan: Aaaca6990Q] Vs. Dcit, Corporate Circle-1(1), Kochi ......... Respondent Assessee By: Shri Abraham Joseph Markos, Adv. Revenue By: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing: 20.08.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 01.09.2025

For Appellant: Shri Abraham Joseph Markos, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 32Section 32(1)(iia)Section 35Section 43(1)Section 92C

short-term loan, in view of the Explanation to Section 35D(3) which refers only to long-term borrowings, and (c) whether the Tribunal had erred in directing deduction under Section 80HH and 80-1 on the miscellaneous income of Rs.26,64,113 being income on sale of empty containers, were substantial questions of law and 16 Apollo Tyres

6
Limitation/Time-bar6
Deduction6

SMT.JALAJA NAIR,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ADIT(INV), TRIVANDRUM

ITA 42/COCH/2019[2004-5]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin22 May 2019

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 132Section 153CSection 254

short term capital gain amounting to Rs.29,22,500/- which is disputed in the Memorandum of Appeal.. 3. The CIT(A) should have found that the estimation of sale consideration at Rs.35 lakhs and the cost of acquisition at Rs.5,77,500/- were both arbitrary and unsustainable. 4. The assessing and 1st appellate authority failed to appreciate that

SMT.JALAJA NAIR,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ADIT(INV), TRIVANDRUM

ITA 44/COCH/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin22 May 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 132Section 153CSection 254

short term capital gain amounting to Rs.29,22,500/- which is disputed in the Memorandum of Appeal.. 3. The CIT(A) should have found that the estimation of sale consideration at Rs.35 lakhs and the cost of acquisition at Rs.5,77,500/- were both arbitrary and unsustainable. 4. The assessing and 1st appellate authority failed to appreciate that

SMT.JALAJA NAIR,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ADIT(INV), TRIVANDRUM

ITA 43/COCH/2019[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin22 May 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 132Section 153CSection 254

short term capital gain amounting to Rs.29,22,500/- which is disputed in the Memorandum of Appeal.. 3. The CIT(A) should have found that the estimation of sale consideration at Rs.35 lakhs and the cost of acquisition at Rs.5,77,500/- were both arbitrary and unsustainable. 4. The assessing and 1st appellate authority failed to appreciate that

THE ACIT, ERNAKULAM vs. M/S.HOLIDAY MARKETING P. LTD, COCHIN

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 32/COCH/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin02 Jan 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Ms. Padmavathy S

For Appellant: Shri. Joseph Markose, Sr. AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Jamuna Devi, Sr. AR
Section 132Section 133ASection 148

short- term capital gain in the hands of the assessee. The AO also made the addition towards the amounts borrowed from Mr.Thampi for an amount of Rs.3,44,00,000/- as unexplained credits under section 68

M/S.PEROORKADA SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ITO, WD-2(1), TRIVANDRUM, TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in I

ITA 400/COCH/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin26 Jun 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(3)Section 194A(3)(viia)Section 195Section 263Section 40Section 40A(3)Section 80P

capital gains and income from other sources, if any, in accordance with provisions of relevant chapters after making due enquiries and calling for information. C. Compute Gross Total Income being A+B above. D Determine profits from accounts eligible to be deducted under section 80P(2)(a) to (f) covering only items included in each of the sub-sections

M/S.PERRORKADA SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ITO, TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in I

ITA 141/COCH/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin26 Jun 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(3)Section 194A(3)(viia)Section 195Section 263Section 40Section 40A(3)Section 80P

capital gains and income from other sources, if any, in accordance with provisions of relevant chapters after making due enquiries and calling for information. C. Compute Gross Total Income being A+B above. D Determine profits from accounts eligible to be deducted under section 80P(2)(a) to (f) covering only items included in each of the sub-sections

M/S.PERRORKADA SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ITO, TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in I

ITA 563/COCH/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin26 Jun 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(3)Section 194A(3)(viia)Section 195Section 263Section 40Section 40A(3)Section 80P

capital gains and income from other sources, if any, in accordance with provisions of relevant chapters after making due enquiries and calling for information. C. Compute Gross Total Income being A+B above. D Determine profits from accounts eligible to be deducted under section 80P(2)(a) to (f) covering only items included in each of the sub-sections

M/S.PEROORKADA SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ITO, WD-2(1), TRIVANDRUM, TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in I

ITA 93/COCH/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin26 Jun 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(3)Section 194A(3)(viia)Section 195Section 263Section 40Section 40A(3)Section 80P

capital gains and income from other sources, if any, in accordance with provisions of relevant chapters after making due enquiries and calling for information. C. Compute Gross Total Income being A+B above. D Determine profits from accounts eligible to be deducted under section 80P(2)(a) to (f) covering only items included in each of the sub-sections

THE ITO, TRIVANDRUM vs. M/S.PERRORKADA SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD, TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in I

ITA 47/COCH/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin26 Jun 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(3)Section 194A(3)(viia)Section 195Section 263Section 40Section 40A(3)Section 80P

capital gains and income from other sources, if any, in accordance with provisions of relevant chapters after making due enquiries and calling for information. C. Compute Gross Total Income being A+B above. D Determine profits from accounts eligible to be deducted under section 80P(2)(a) to (f) covering only items included in each of the sub-sections

SMT.K.B.SONY,COCHIN vs. THE DCIT, COCHIN

In the result, i) The appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 320/COCH/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin24 May 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 69

term capital gain, were the sale consideration was shown at a sum of Rs.10 lakhs. This fact clearly established that Martin Jose stood consistently with the same stand during the cross examination by the assessee and the same amount of consideration of Rs. 10 lakhs was found in the computation of income and based on that assessment was completed

FEDERAL BANK LTD,KOCHI vs. ACIT CORP. CIRCLE-1(1 ) , KOCHI

ITA 395/COCH/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin13 Aug 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Appellant: Sri.Gopi, CAFor Respondent: Sri.Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 144Section 147Section 14ASection 36Section 36(1)(viii)

short “the Act” hereinafter. Heard both the parties at length. Case files perused. 2 ITA Nos.393-399/Coch/2023. Federal Bank Limited. 2. We come to the assessee’s “lead” appeal ITA No.393/Coch/2023 for assessment year 2011-2012, raising inter alia the following substantive grounds:- “I. a) The Ld. CIT(4)) erred in upholding the validity of re- opening of assessment

FEDERAL BANK LTD,KOCHI vs. ACIT CORP. CIRCLE-1(1 ) , KOCHI

ITA 393/COCH/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin13 Aug 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Appellant: Sri.Gopi, CAFor Respondent: Sri.Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 144Section 147Section 14ASection 36Section 36(1)(viii)

short “the Act” hereinafter. Heard both the parties at length. Case files perused. 2 ITA Nos.393-399/Coch/2023. Federal Bank Limited. 2. We come to the assessee’s “lead” appeal ITA No.393/Coch/2023 for assessment year 2011-2012, raising inter alia the following substantive grounds:- “I. a) The Ld. CIT(4)) erred in upholding the validity of re- opening of assessment

FEDERAL BANK LTD,KOCHI vs. ACIT CORP. CIRCLE-1(1 ) , KOCHI

ITA 399/COCH/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin13 Aug 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Appellant: Sri.Gopi, CAFor Respondent: Sri.Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 144Section 147Section 14ASection 36Section 36(1)(viii)

short “the Act” hereinafter. Heard both the parties at length. Case files perused. 2 ITA Nos.393-399/Coch/2023. Federal Bank Limited. 2. We come to the assessee’s “lead” appeal ITA No.393/Coch/2023 for assessment year 2011-2012, raising inter alia the following substantive grounds:- “I. a) The Ld. CIT(4)) erred in upholding the validity of re- opening of assessment

FEDERAL BANK LTD,KOCHI vs. ACIT CORP. CIRCLE-1(1 ) , KOCHI

ITA 396/COCH/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin13 Aug 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Appellant: Sri.Gopi, CAFor Respondent: Sri.Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 144Section 147Section 14ASection 36Section 36(1)(viii)

short “the Act” hereinafter. Heard both the parties at length. Case files perused. 2 ITA Nos.393-399/Coch/2023. Federal Bank Limited. 2. We come to the assessee’s “lead” appeal ITA No.393/Coch/2023 for assessment year 2011-2012, raising inter alia the following substantive grounds:- “I. a) The Ld. CIT(4)) erred in upholding the validity of re- opening of assessment

FEDERAL BANK LTD,KOCHI vs. ACIT CORP. CIRCLE-1(1 ) , KOCHI

ITA 397/COCH/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin13 Aug 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Appellant: Sri.Gopi, CAFor Respondent: Sri.Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 144Section 147Section 14ASection 36Section 36(1)(viii)

short “the Act” hereinafter. Heard both the parties at length. Case files perused. 2 ITA Nos.393-399/Coch/2023. Federal Bank Limited. 2. We come to the assessee’s “lead” appeal ITA No.393/Coch/2023 for assessment year 2011-2012, raising inter alia the following substantive grounds:- “I. a) The Ld. CIT(4)) erred in upholding the validity of re- opening of assessment

FEDERAL BANK LTD,KOCHI vs. ACIT CORP. CIRCLE-1(1 ) , KOCHI

ITA 394/COCH/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin13 Aug 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Appellant: Sri.Gopi, CAFor Respondent: Sri.Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 144Section 147Section 14ASection 36Section 36(1)(viii)

short “the Act” hereinafter. Heard both the parties at length. Case files perused. 2 ITA Nos.393-399/Coch/2023. Federal Bank Limited. 2. We come to the assessee’s “lead” appeal ITA No.393/Coch/2023 for assessment year 2011-2012, raising inter alia the following substantive grounds:- “I. a) The Ld. CIT(4)) erred in upholding the validity of re- opening of assessment

INFOPARKS KERALA,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE JT DIRECTOR OF IT (OSD) EXEM), COCHIN

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are partly allowed

ITA 76/COCH/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin11 Aug 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Am & Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm

For Appellant: Sri. Rajakannan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr.AR
Section 11Section 11(1)Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 2(15)

short], vide his separate orders of even date (30.5.2014). The appeals raising the same issues; also decided likewise, were heard together, and are being disposed per a common order for the sake of convenience. 2. The principal issue in the instant appeals is if the assessee, a society constituted under the Travancore-Cochin Literary, Scientific and Charitable Societies Registration

INFOPARKS KERALA,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE JT DIRECTOR OF IT (OSD) EXEM), COCHIN

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are partly allowed

ITA 75/COCH/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin11 Aug 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Am & Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm

For Appellant: Sri. Rajakannan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr.AR
Section 11Section 11(1)Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 2(15)

short], vide his separate orders of even date (30.5.2014). The appeals raising the same issues; also decided likewise, were heard together, and are being disposed per a common order for the sake of convenience. 2. The principal issue in the instant appeals is if the assessee, a society constituted under the Travancore-Cochin Literary, Scientific and Charitable Societies Registration

INFOPARKS KERALA,COCHIN vs. THE ACIT, COCHIN

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are partly allowed

ITA 77/COCH/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin11 Aug 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Am & Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm

For Appellant: Sri. Rajakannan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr.AR
Section 11Section 11(1)Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 2(15)

short], vide his separate orders of even date (30.5.2014). The appeals raising the same issues; also decided likewise, were heard together, and are being disposed per a common order for the sake of convenience. 2. The principal issue in the instant appeals is if the assessee, a society constituted under the Travancore-Cochin Literary, Scientific and Charitable Societies Registration