THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE-2, ERNAKULAM, ERNAKULAM vs. M/S.THOMSON AGENCIES, KOMBODINJAMAKKAL, TRICHUR, TRICHUR
In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 311/COCH/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin01 Apr 2019AY 2007-08
Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm
For Appellant: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DRFor Respondent: Sri. Sathish John Kanichai, FCA
Section 132Section 153ASection 68
94,816
34,79,017
2009-10
P.T.Varghese
39,78,230 11,50,958
51,29,188
45,00,000
33,49,047
1,01,51,363
4. The CIT(A) has overlooked that going by CIT(A)’s own logic, unexplained credit total Rs.1,01,51,363 in A.Y. 2009-10. This ought to have been sustained.
Grounds