SRI.THOMAS EAPEN,ALAPPUZHA vs. THE ITO, WD-5, ALAPPUZHA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

68 of the Act. In other words, the Assessing Officer has not at all rejected the books of accounts of the assessee. Section 44AD provides that where the assessee is engaged in eligible business as proprietor under that section, a sum equal to 8% of the gross receipts shall be deemed to be the profits and gains

SRI.GEORGE M.GEORGE,KOZHENCHERRY vs. THE ACIT, CIR-1, THIRUVALLA, THIRUVALLA

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

section 68. 2. The officers below failed to appreciate the fact that the income earned by the appellant was agriculture and will tantamount to income by overriding title. 3. The officers below failed to appreciate the fact if the appellant is not entitled to the agriculture income, the same should have been taxed in the hands

SRI.GEORGE M.GEORGE,KOZHENCHERRY, PATHANAMTHITTA vs. THE ACIT, CIR-1, THIRUVALLA, THIRUVALLA

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

section 68 of the I.T.Act. The relevant finding of the Assessing Officer reads as follows:- “6. In short, the agricultural income of the assessee for the above year is NIL and the claim is totally disallowed. Accordingly assessee’s claim of Rs.12,36,000/- from income from agriculture is brought to assessment as unexplained cash credits u/s 68

SMT.K.B.SONY,COCHIN vs. THE DCIT, COCHIN

In the result, i) The appeal of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 36 deals with other deduction in respect of premium paid, interest etc. 3.7 In the present case, there is no allegation by the Assessing Officer that the sassessee has not incurred any expenditure. The only allegation is that the assessee has not rendered any services to M/s. Rosy Blue (India) Pvt. Ltd. In our opinion when there

THE ITO, WD-1(1), KOCHI vs. SHRI.P.V.ABRAHAM, KOCHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

92 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (for brevity 'the 1972 Act') incorporate the aforesaid principle. 3. The facts of the case are that on verification of details produced, it was found that the assessee had made huge deposits in his bank accounts in SBI Kakkanad, Federal Bank Thrippunithura, Canara Bank Thripunithura and Federal Bank Puthencruz as under

M/S.IBS SOFTWARE SERVICES P. LTD,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE DCIT, TRIVANDRUM

Bench: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY (Judicial Member)

68,911/- The Assessee has now preferred the present appeal challenging Final Assessment Order. The Assessee has raised 17 Grounds of Appeal which are taken up in seriatim hereinafter. Ground No.1 3. Ground No.1 raised by the Assessee reads as under: “1. That the order of the learned Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle 1(1), Thiruvananthapuram (Assessing Officer

MR.SEEGLIN JOSE MORAIS OUSEPH,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ITO, WD-1(3), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm Assessment Year: 2009-10

92 of Evidence Act. The agreement for sale and the terms contained therein should have been given due weightage by the authorities. Section 91 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with respect to the agreement for sale and the terms therein should have been duly apprised by the authorities. Likewise non applicability of section 17 of the Registration

DCIT, TRICHUR vs. M/S.EDASSERY CERAMICS, TRICHUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

section 153A vide order dated 29.12.2009 in respect of the Asst. Years 2002-03 to 2007-08 and u/s. 143(3) in respect of Asst. Year 2008-09 in respect of the following 84 cases in inspect of 13 Assesees. 1. M/s New Kerala Investments ( Asst Years 2002-03 to 2008-09) 2. M/s E T Devassy & Sons, Edassery

DCIT, TRICHUR vs. M/S/E.T.DEVASSY &SONS, TRICHUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

section 153A vide order dated 29.12.2009 in respect of the Asst. Years 2002-03 to 2007-08 and u/s. 143(3) in respect of Asst. Year 2008-09 in respect of the following 84 cases in inspect of 13 Assesees. 1. M/s New Kerala Investments ( Asst Years 2002-03 to 2008-09) 2. M/s E T Devassy & Sons, Edassery

DCIT, TRICHUR vs. M/S.EDASSERY CERAMICS, TRICHUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

section 153A vide order dated 29.12.2009 in respect of the Asst. Years 2002-03 to 2007-08 and u/s. 143(3) in respect of Asst. Year 2008-09 in respect of the following 84 cases in inspect of 13 Assesees. 1. M/s New Kerala Investments ( Asst Years 2002-03 to 2008-09) 2. M/s E T Devassy & Sons, Edassery

DCIT, TRICHUR vs. M/S ST.FRANCIS CLAY DECOR TILES, THRISSUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

section 153A vide order dated 29.12.2009 in respect of the Asst. Years 2002-03 to 2007-08 and u/s. 143(3) in respect of Asst. Year 2008-09 in respect of the following 84 cases in inspect of 13 Assesees. 1. M/s New Kerala Investments ( Asst Years 2002-03 to 2008-09) 2. M/s E T Devassy & Sons, Edassery

DCIT, TRICHUR vs. M/S NEW KERALA INVESTMENTS, TRICHUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

section 153A vide order dated 29.12.2009 in respect of the Asst. Years 2002-03 to 2007-08 and u/s. 143(3) in respect of Asst. Year 2008-09 in respect of the following 84 cases in inspect of 13 Assesees. 1. M/s New Kerala Investments ( Asst Years 2002-03 to 2008-09) 2. M/s E T Devassy & Sons, Edassery

DCIT, TRICHUR vs. M/S/E.T.DEVASSY &SONS,

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

section 153A vide order dated 29.12.2009 in respect of the Asst. Years 2002-03 to 2007-08 and u/s. 143(3) in respect of Asst. Year 2008-09 in respect of the following 84 cases in inspect of 13 Assesees. 1. M/s New Kerala Investments ( Asst Years 2002-03 to 2008-09) 2. M/s E T Devassy & Sons, Edassery

DCIT, TRICHUR vs. M/S ST.FRANCIS CLAY DECOR TILES, THRISSUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

section 153A vide order dated 29.12.2009 in respect of the Asst. Years 2002-03 to 2007-08 and u/s. 143(3) in respect of Asst. Year 2008-09 in respect of the following 84 cases in inspect of 13 Assesees. 1. M/s New Kerala Investments ( Asst Years 2002-03 to 2008-09) 2. M/s E T Devassy & Sons, Edassery

DCIT, TRICHUR vs. ST.FRANCIS CLAY WORKS, TRICHUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

section 153A vide order dated 29.12.2009 in respect of the Asst. Years 2002-03 to 2007-08 and u/s. 143(3) in respect of Asst. Year 2008-09 in respect of the following 84 cases in inspect of 13 Assesees. 1. M/s New Kerala Investments ( Asst Years 2002-03 to 2008-09) 2. M/s E T Devassy & Sons, Edassery

DCIT, TRICHUR vs. ST.FRANCIS CLAY WORKS, TRICHUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

section 153A vide order dated 29.12.2009 in respect of the Asst. Years 2002-03 to 2007-08 and u/s. 143(3) in respect of Asst. Year 2008-09 in respect of the following 84 cases in inspect of 13 Assesees. 1. M/s New Kerala Investments ( Asst Years 2002-03 to 2008-09) 2. M/s E T Devassy & Sons, Edassery

DCIT, TRICHUR vs. M/S/E.T.DEVASSY &SONS, TRICHUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

section 153A vide order dated 29.12.2009 in respect of the Asst. Years 2002-03 to 2007-08 and u/s. 143(3) in respect of Asst. Year 2008-09 in respect of the following 84 cases in inspect of 13 Assesees. 1. M/s New Kerala Investments ( Asst Years 2002-03 to 2008-09) 2. M/s E T Devassy & Sons, Edassery

DCIT, TRICHUR vs. ST.FRANCIS CLAY WORKS, TRICHUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

section 153A vide order dated 29.12.2009 in respect of the Asst. Years 2002-03 to 2007-08 and u/s. 143(3) in respect of Asst. Year 2008-09 in respect of the following 84 cases in inspect of 13 Assesees. 1. M/s New Kerala Investments ( Asst Years 2002-03 to 2008-09) 2. M/s E T Devassy & Sons, Edassery

DCIT, TRICHUR vs. ST.FRANCIS CLAY WORKS, TRICHUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

section 153A vide order dated 29.12.2009 in respect of the Asst. Years 2002-03 to 2007-08 and u/s. 143(3) in respect of Asst. Year 2008-09 in respect of the following 84 cases in inspect of 13 Assesees. 1. M/s New Kerala Investments ( Asst Years 2002-03 to 2008-09) 2. M/s E T Devassy & Sons, Edassery