BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

235 results for “section 68”+ Section 65clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi3,536Mumbai2,533Bangalore966Chennai733Ahmedabad640Karnataka640Kolkata553Jaipur540Hyderabad483Pune347Indore342Chandigarh325Surat298Cochin235Raipur126Visakhapatnam102Cuttack98Nagpur97Telangana89Rajkot86Lucknow82Ranchi78Calcutta68Jabalpur63Guwahati60Allahabad58Amritsar56SC55Agra47Patna47Jodhpur44Dehradun21Varanasi13Rajasthan9Orissa8Panaji5Uttarakhand3Andhra Pradesh1Kerala1Himachal Pradesh1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1

Key Topics

Section 25072Section 14A45Section 153A42Section 201(1)40Section 271C30Section 143(3)28Section 20120Limitation/Time-bar17Section 142(1)14Disallowance

RAJU JOSEPH VAYALAT,ERNAKULAM vs. ITO, WARD-2(5), KOCHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 273/COCH/2024[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin26 Aug 2025AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Sonjoy Sarma

Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 68

Section 68 of the Act. The assessee sought time but failed to furnish any further explanation. Accordingly, the AO reduced the current year’s profit of Rs. 17,65

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, KOLLAM vs. ALLEBASI BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS (P) LTD, ATTINGAL

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed and Revenue’s appeal and assessee’s cross objection stand dismissed

ITA 317/COCH/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin

Showing 1–20 of 235 · Page 1 of 12

...
12
Addition to Income12
TDS11
09 Jun 2025
AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Soundararajan K., Jm

For Appellant: Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Suresh Sivanandan, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 148

65,856/-. However, based on the finding given by the ITAT in the case Shri Rajendran Pillai, the CIT(A) confirmed the addition in respect of loan received from other parties to the extent of Rs. 2,68,00,224/-. Thus, the appeal filed by the assessee stands partly allowed by the CIT(A). 5. Being aggrieved by that part

SMT.K.B.SONY,COCHIN vs. THE DCIT, COCHIN

In the result, i) The appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 320/COCH/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin24 May 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 69

Section 36 deals with other deduction in respect of premium paid, interest etc. 3.7 In the present case, there is no allegation by the Assessing Officer that the sassessee has not incurred any expenditure. The only allegation is that the assessee has not rendered any services to M/s. Rosy Blue (India) Pvt. Ltd. In our opinion when there

HASEENA MEHBOOB,CALICUT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(1), KOZHIKODE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands partly allowed

ITA 954/COCH/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin16 May 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri George George K., Vp & Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am

For Appellant: Shri G. Surendranath Rao, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R
Section 143(3)Section 68

68 of the Act. The CIT(A), considering the above submissions held that taking into consideration that the crop produce is higher by 25% as compared to the immediate preceding year, the profit from agriculture is estimated at Rs. 18,57,471/- and the balance addition of Rs. 65,19,020/- is confirmed. 4. Being aggrieved, the appellant

SMT.ASHA MENON( ASHA SUNIL),COCHIN vs. THE ACIT(CEN,CIRCLE, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 595/COCH/2018[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Apr 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

68,316/- was not considered by him. Insofar as the amount that has been taken by the Assessing Officer is concerned, the Tribunal has noted that in the absence of any details with regard to earning of income and the persons from whom the money was received, the Assessing Officer has rightly treated the entire amount as income. Insofar

SRI.O.G.SUNIL,COCHIN vs. DCIT, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 48/COCH/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Apr 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

68,316/- was not considered by him. Insofar as the amount that has been taken by the Assessing Officer is concerned, the Tribunal has noted that in the absence of any details with regard to earning of income and the persons from whom the money was received, the Assessing Officer has rightly treated the entire amount as income. Insofar

SRI.O.G.SUNIL,COCHIN vs. DCIT, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 49/COCH/2014[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Apr 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

68,316/- was not considered by him. Insofar as the amount that has been taken by the Assessing Officer is concerned, the Tribunal has noted that in the absence of any details with regard to earning of income and the persons from whom the money was received, the Assessing Officer has rightly treated the entire amount as income. Insofar

SRI.O.G.SUNIL,COCHIN vs. DCIT, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 51/COCH/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Apr 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

68,316/- was not considered by him. Insofar as the amount that has been taken by the Assessing Officer is concerned, the Tribunal has noted that in the absence of any details with regard to earning of income and the persons from whom the money was received, the Assessing Officer has rightly treated the entire amount as income. Insofar

SMT.ASHA MENON( ASHA SUNIL),COCHIN vs. THE DCIT, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 594/COCH/2018[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Apr 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

68,316/- was not considered by him. Insofar as the amount that has been taken by the Assessing Officer is concerned, the Tribunal has noted that in the absence of any details with regard to earning of income and the persons from whom the money was received, the Assessing Officer has rightly treated the entire amount as income. Insofar

SRI.O.G.SUNIL,COCHIN vs. DCIT, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 46/COCH/2014[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Apr 2019AY 2003-04

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

68,316/- was not considered by him. Insofar as the amount that has been taken by the Assessing Officer is concerned, the Tribunal has noted that in the absence of any details with regard to earning of income and the persons from whom the money was received, the Assessing Officer has rightly treated the entire amount as income. Insofar

SRI.O.G.SUNIL,COCHIN vs. DCIT, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 50/COCH/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Apr 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

68,316/- was not considered by him. Insofar as the amount that has been taken by the Assessing Officer is concerned, the Tribunal has noted that in the absence of any details with regard to earning of income and the persons from whom the money was received, the Assessing Officer has rightly treated the entire amount as income. Insofar

SRI.O.G.SUNIL,COCHIN vs. DCIT, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 47/COCH/2014[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Apr 2019AY 2004-05

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

68,316/- was not considered by him. Insofar as the amount that has been taken by the Assessing Officer is concerned, the Tribunal has noted that in the absence of any details with regard to earning of income and the persons from whom the money was received, the Assessing Officer has rightly treated the entire amount as income. Insofar

SMT.ASHA MENON( ASHA SUNIL),COCHIN vs. THE ACIT(CEN,CIRCLE, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 596/COCH/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Apr 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

68,316/- was not considered by him. Insofar as the amount that has been taken by the Assessing Officer is concerned, the Tribunal has noted that in the absence of any details with regard to earning of income and the persons from whom the money was received, the Assessing Officer has rightly treated the entire amount as income. Insofar

THE ACIT, TRIVANDRUM vs. M/S. KILLI CONSTRUCTIONS, TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue, the appeal filed by the

ITA 299/COCH/2016[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin29 Jan 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari , Am & George George K., Jm

Section 68

section 68 for the following reasons, 1. The appellant has taken two different stands i.e. the one during the course of reassessment proceedings stating that it was a loan availed and another one during the course of appeal hearing stating the same as paid towards allotment of 1000 sq. ft. space in the “Killi Towers” to be constructed

M/S.KILLI CONSTRUCTIONS,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE DCIT, TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue, the appeal filed by the

ITA 369/COCH/2016[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin29 Jan 2018AY 2005-06

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari , Am & George George K., Jm

Section 68

section 68 for the following reasons, 1. The appellant has taken two different stands i.e. the one during the course of reassessment proceedings stating that it was a loan availed and another one during the course of appeal hearing stating the same as paid towards allotment of 1000 sq. ft. space in the “Killi Towers” to be constructed

THE ACIT, TRIVANDRUM vs. M/S. KILLI CONSTRUCTIONS, TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue, the appeal filed by the

ITA 298/COCH/2016[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin29 Jan 2018AY 2006-07

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari , Am & George George K., Jm

Section 68

section 68 for the following reasons, 1. The appellant has taken two different stands i.e. the one during the course of reassessment proceedings stating that it was a loan availed and another one during the course of appeal hearing stating the same as paid towards allotment of 1000 sq. ft. space in the “Killi Towers” to be constructed

DCIT, TRICHUR vs. M/S.EDASSERY CERAMICS, TRICHUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 596/COCH/2013[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin26 Jun 2019AY 2004-05

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153A

68,658 2,976 65,682 2003-04 26,639 6,21,373 5,94,734 2,28,354 9,556 2,18,798 7 I.T.A. Nos.539-543 /Coch/2013, 532-535/Coch/2013 525 to 529/Coch/2013 594-597/Coch/2013 & 587-589/Coch/2013

DCIT, TRICHUR vs. ST.FRANCIS CLAY WORKS, TRICHUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 525/COCH/2013[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin26 Jun 2019AY 2002-03

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153A

68,658 2,976 65,682 2003-04 26,639 6,21,373 5,94,734 2,28,354 9,556 2,18,798 7 I.T.A. Nos.539-543 /Coch/2013, 532-535/Coch/2013 525 to 529/Coch/2013 594-597/Coch/2013 & 587-589/Coch/2013

DCIT, TRICHUR vs. M/S.EDASSERY CERAMICS, TRICHUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 597/COCH/2013[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin26 Jun 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153A

68,658 2,976 65,682 2003-04 26,639 6,21,373 5,94,734 2,28,354 9,556 2,18,798 7 I.T.A. Nos.539-543 /Coch/2013, 532-535/Coch/2013 525 to 529/Coch/2013 594-597/Coch/2013 & 587-589/Coch/2013

DCIT, TRICHUR vs. M/S ST.FRANCIS CLAY DECOR TILES, THRISSUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 587/COCH/2013[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin26 Jun 2019AY 2004-05

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153A

68,658 2,976 65,682 2003-04 26,639 6,21,373 5,94,734 2,28,354 9,556 2,18,798 7 I.T.A. Nos.539-543 /Coch/2013, 532-535/Coch/2013 525 to 529/Coch/2013 594-597/Coch/2013 & 587-589/Coch/2013