HASEENA MEHBOOB,CALICUT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(1), KOZHIKODE
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands partly allowed
ITA 954/COCH/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin16 May 2025AY 2018-19
Bench: Shri George George K., Vp & Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am
For Appellant: Shri G. Surendranath Rao, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R
Section 143(3)Section 68
3A)
& 143(3B) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) after making addition of Rs. 96,01,431/- treading the entire gross proceeds from agricultural activities as unexplained income of the appellant.
3. Being aggrieved, an appeal was filed before the CIT(A), contending that the appellant is holding around 87 acres of agricultural land cultivating crops like coconut
