Search: section 68

10 results for “section 68”+ Section 302clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 115B12 Section 2638 Section 688 Addition to Income8 Section 3(1)(b)2 Section 482 Unexplained Cash Credit2 Unexplained Investment2 Survey u/s 133A2

SRI.P.V.RAVINDRAN,KANNUR vs. THE ITO, KANNUR

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 302/COCH/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 Sept 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri. Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Shri T.M. Sreedharan, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Shantam Bose, CIT DR

Section 115BSection 263Section 3(1)(b)Section 68

302 & 303/Coch/2020 as it was applicable for A.Ys. under consideration being 2014-15 and 2015-16 u/s. 115BBE is reproduced as under: [Tax on income referred to in section 68

SRI.P.V.RAVINDRAN,KANNUR vs. THE ITO, KANNUR

SHRI.P.V. RAVEENDRAN,KANNUR vs. THE ITO, KANNUR

SRI.P.V.RAVINDRAN,KANNUR vs. THE ITO, KANNUR

SHRI.P.V. RAVEENDRAN,KANNUR vs. THE ITO, KANNUR

DCIT, ERNAKULAM vs. MATHA ENTERPRISES, ANGAMALLY

M/S BEST BAKERY & ICE CREAM PARLOUR,ANGAMALLY vs. ACIT, ERNAKULAM

M/S. MATHA ENTERPRISES,,ANGAMALLY vs. ACIT, ERNAKULAM

M/S BEST BAKERY & ICE CREAM PARLOUR,ANGAMALLY vs. ACIT, ERNAKULAM

M/S. MATHA ENTERPRISES,,ANGAMALLY vs. ACIT, ERNAKULAM

M/S. MATHA ENTERPRISES,,ANGAMALLY vs. ACIT, ERNAKULAM

M/S BEST BAKERY & ICE CREAM PARLOUR,ANGAMALLY vs. ACIT, ERNAKULAM

M/S.KADUNA HOSPITALITY P. LTD,COCHIN vs. THE ITO, COCHIN