SARAMMA THOMAS THANKACHAN,KOLLAM vs. ITO, NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 839/COCH/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin16 May 2025AY 2016-17
Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Keshav Dubeyassessmentyear:2016-17 Saramma Thomas Thankachan Robin Cottage Nedumpaikulam Ito& Vs. Kundara Po Nfac, Kerala 691 501 Delhi Pan No :Audpt5972D Appellant Respondent Appellant By : Shri N.S. Panicker, A.R. Respondent By : Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R. Date Of Hearing : 19.02.2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 16.05.2025 O R D E R Perkeshav Dubey: This Appeal At The Instance Of The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Cit(A)/Nfac Dated 9.8.2024 Vide Din & Order No.Itba/Nfac/S/250/2024-25/1067491706(1) For The Ay 2016- 17 Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short “The Act”).
For Appellant: Shri N.S. Panicker, A.RFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R
Section 142(1)Section 147Section 148Section 249(3)Section 250Section 68
section 249(3) r.w.s. 250 of the Act as the assessee could not show any sufficient cause for delay in filing appeal before the ld. CIT(A)/NFAC. The ld. CIT(A) observed that the reasons cited by the assessee are not found tenable and thus the prayer for condonation of delay filed by the assessee is not admissible
