BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

155 results for “section 68”+ Section 234Eclear

Sorted by relevance

Cochin155Indore107Bangalore91Chennai24Karnataka21Rajkot4Nagpur4Ahmedabad3Delhi3Jaipur2Mumbai2Agra2

Key Topics

Limitation/Time-bar98TDS56Section 234E19Section 200A13Section 234B11Section 1547Charitable Trust4Section 37(1)2

CORPORATION ENGINEER LSGD ,CALICUT vs. ITO, KOZHIKKODE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 219/COCH/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Jun 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri George George K, Jm & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu, Am

For Appellant: Sri.Anand Kumar V.K., AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt.J.M.Jamunna Devi, Sr.DR
Section 200ASection 234E

68,100 4. Aggrieved by the orders of the Assessing Officer, the assessee filed appeals before the first appellate authority. The CIT(A) confirmed the A.O.’s orders for levying fees u/s 234E of the I.T.Act. The CIT(A) relied on the judgment of the Hon’ble Kerala High Court in the case of Sree Narayana Guru Smaraka Sangam Upper

CORPORATION ENGINEER LSGD ,CALICUT vs. ITO, KOZHIKKODE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Showing 1–20 of 155 · Page 1 of 8

...
ITA 218/COCH/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Jun 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri George George K, Jm & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu, Am

For Appellant: Sri.Anand Kumar V.K., AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt.J.M.Jamunna Devi, Sr.DR
Section 200ASection 234E

68,100 4. Aggrieved by the orders of the Assessing Officer, the assessee filed appeals before the first appellate authority. The CIT(A) confirmed the A.O.’s orders for levying fees u/s 234E of the I.T.Act. The CIT(A) relied on the judgment of the Hon’ble Kerala High Court in the case of Sree Narayana Guru Smaraka Sangam Upper

CORPORATION ENGINEER LSGD ,CALICUT vs. ITO, KOZHIKKODE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 196/COCH/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Jun 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George George K, Jm & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu, Am

For Appellant: Sri.Anand Kumar V.K., AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt.J.M.Jamunna Devi, Sr.DR
Section 200ASection 234E

68,100 4. Aggrieved by the orders of the Assessing Officer, the assessee filed appeals before the first appellate authority. The CIT(A) confirmed the A.O.’s orders for levying fees u/s 234E of the I.T.Act. The CIT(A) relied on the judgment of the Hon’ble Kerala High Court in the case of Sree Narayana Guru Smaraka Sangam Upper

KERALA GRAMIN BANK, CHENGOTTUKAVU BRANCH,KOYILANDY vs. THE ITO WARD TDS, KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE

ITA 711/COCH/2022[2013-2014 (26Q, Q4)]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin12 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Smt.Beena Pillai, Jm

234E of the I.T. Act. The Hon’ble Kerala Court was not adjudicating the issue whether the amendment to section 200A of the I.T.Act with effect from 01.06.2015 has retrospective effect or not. As mentioned earlier, the amendment to section 200A of the I.T.Act whether it applicable from 01.06.2015 has been decided in favour of the assessee

KERALA GRAMIN BANK, CHERPULASSERY BRANCH,PALAKKAD vs. THE ITO WARD TDS, PALAKKAD, PALAKKAD

ITA 726/COCH/2022[2013-2014(26Q, Q3)]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin12 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Smt.Beena Pillai, Jm

234E of the I.T. Act. The Hon’ble Kerala Court was not adjudicating the issue whether the amendment to section 200A of the I.T.Act with effect from 01.06.2015 has retrospective effect or not. As mentioned earlier, the amendment to section 200A of the I.T.Act whether it applicable from 01.06.2015 has been decided in favour of the assessee

KERALA GRAMIN BANK, CHALIKKARA BRANCH,KOZHIKODE vs. THE ITO WARD TDS, KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE

ITA 751/COCH/2022[2013-2014(24Q,Q2)]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin12 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Smt.Beena Pillai, Jm

234E of the I.T. Act. The Hon’ble Kerala Court was not adjudicating the issue whether the amendment to section 200A of the I.T.Act with effect from 01.06.2015 has retrospective effect or not. As mentioned earlier, the amendment to section 200A of the I.T.Act whether it applicable from 01.06.2015 has been decided in favour of the assessee

KERALA GRAMIN BANK, CHEERAL BRANCH,WAYANAD vs. THE ITO WARD TDS, KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE

ITA 731/COCH/2022[2013-2014(24Q,Q4)]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin12 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Smt.Beena Pillai, Jm

234E of the I.T. Act. The Hon’ble Kerala Court was not adjudicating the issue whether the amendment to section 200A of the I.T.Act with effect from 01.06.2015 has retrospective effect or not. As mentioned earlier, the amendment to section 200A of the I.T.Act whether it applicable from 01.06.2015 has been decided in favour of the assessee

KERALA GRAMIN BANK, CHELEMBRA BRANCH,MALAPPURAM vs. THE ITO WARD TDS, KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE

ITA 715/COCH/2022[2015-2016 (26Q, Q2)]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin12 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Smt.Beena Pillai, Jm

234E of the I.T. Act. The Hon’ble Kerala Court was not adjudicating the issue whether the amendment to section 200A of the I.T.Act with effect from 01.06.2015 has retrospective effect or not. As mentioned earlier, the amendment to section 200A of the I.T.Act whether it applicable from 01.06.2015 has been decided in favour of the assessee

KERALA GRAMIN BANK, CHERPULASSERY BRANCH,PALAKKAD vs. THE ITO WARD TDS, PALAKKAD, PALAKKAD

ITA 724/COCH/2022[2013-2014(26Q, Q2)]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin12 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Smt.Beena Pillai, Jm

234E of the I.T. Act. The Hon’ble Kerala Court was not adjudicating the issue whether the amendment to section 200A of the I.T.Act with effect from 01.06.2015 has retrospective effect or not. As mentioned earlier, the amendment to section 200A of the I.T.Act whether it applicable from 01.06.2015 has been decided in favour of the assessee

KERALA GRAMIN BANK, CHERPULASSERY BRANCH,PALAKKAD vs. THE ITO WARD TDS, PALAKKAD, PALAKKAD

ITA 725/COCH/2022[2013-2014(24Q,Q3)]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin12 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Smt.Beena Pillai, Jm

234E of the I.T. Act. The Hon’ble Kerala Court was not adjudicating the issue whether the amendment to section 200A of the I.T.Act with effect from 01.06.2015 has retrospective effect or not. As mentioned earlier, the amendment to section 200A of the I.T.Act whether it applicable from 01.06.2015 has been decided in favour of the assessee

KERALA GRAMIN BANK, ELANKUR BRANCH,MALAPPURAM vs. THE ITO WARD TDS, KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE

ITA 744/COCH/2022[2013-2014(26Q,Q2)]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin12 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Smt.Beena Pillai, Jm

234E of the I.T. Act. The Hon’ble Kerala Court was not adjudicating the issue whether the amendment to section 200A of the I.T.Act with effect from 01.06.2015 has retrospective effect or not. As mentioned earlier, the amendment to section 200A of the I.T.Act whether it applicable from 01.06.2015 has been decided in favour of the assessee

KERALA GRAMIN BANK, EDAVANNA BRANCH,MALAPPURAM vs. THE ITO WARD TDS, KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE

ITA 747/COCH/2022[2013-2014(24Q,Q2)]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin12 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Smt.Beena Pillai, Jm

234E of the I.T. Act. The Hon’ble Kerala Court was not adjudicating the issue whether the amendment to section 200A of the I.T.Act with effect from 01.06.2015 has retrospective effect or not. As mentioned earlier, the amendment to section 200A of the I.T.Act whether it applicable from 01.06.2015 has been decided in favour of the assessee

KERALA GRAMIN BANK, CHERUCODE BRANCH,MALAPPURAM vs. THE ITO WARD TDS, KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE

ITA 719/COCH/2022[2013-2014 (24Q, Q2)]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin12 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Smt.Beena Pillai, Jm

234E of the I.T. Act. The Hon’ble Kerala Court was not adjudicating the issue whether the amendment to section 200A of the I.T.Act with effect from 01.06.2015 has retrospective effect or not. As mentioned earlier, the amendment to section 200A of the I.T.Act whether it applicable from 01.06.2015 has been decided in favour of the assessee

KERALA GRAMIN BANK, CHAKKITTAPARA BRANCH,KOZHIKODE vs. THE ITO WARD TDS, KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE

ITA 771/COCH/2022[2013-2014(26Q,Q3)]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin12 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Smt.Beena Pillai, Jm

234E of the I.T. Act. The Hon’ble Kerala Court was not adjudicating the issue whether the amendment to section 200A of the I.T.Act with effect from 01.06.2015 has retrospective effect or not. As mentioned earlier, the amendment to section 200A of the I.T.Act whether it applicable from 01.06.2015 has been decided in favour of the assessee

KERALA GRAMIN BANK, EDACHERY BRANCH,KOZHIKODE vs. THE ITO WARD TDS, KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE

ITA 779/COCH/2022[2013-2014(24Q,Q4)]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin12 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Smt.Beena Pillai, Jm

234E of the I.T. Act. The Hon’ble Kerala Court was not adjudicating the issue whether the amendment to section 200A of the I.T.Act with effect from 01.06.2015 has retrospective effect or not. As mentioned earlier, the amendment to section 200A of the I.T.Act whether it applicable from 01.06.2015 has been decided in favour of the assessee

KERALA GRAMIN BANK, KOYALMANNAM BRANCH,PALAKKAD vs. THE ITO WARD TDS, PALAKKAD, PALAKKAD

ITA 735/COCH/2022[2013-2014(24Q,Q2)]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin12 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Smt.Beena Pillai, Jm

234E of the I.T. Act. The Hon’ble Kerala Court was not adjudicating the issue whether the amendment to section 200A of the I.T.Act with effect from 01.06.2015 has retrospective effect or not. As mentioned earlier, the amendment to section 200A of the I.T.Act whether it applicable from 01.06.2015 has been decided in favour of the assessee

KERALA GRAMIN BANK, CHENGOTTUKAVU BRANCH,KOYILANDY vs. THE ITO WARD TDS, KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE

ITA 710/COCH/2022[2013-2014(24Q, Q3)]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin12 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Smt.Beena Pillai, Jm

234E of the I.T. Act. The Hon’ble Kerala Court was not adjudicating the issue whether the amendment to section 200A of the I.T.Act with effect from 01.06.2015 has retrospective effect or not. As mentioned earlier, the amendment to section 200A of the I.T.Act whether it applicable from 01.06.2015 has been decided in favour of the assessee

KERALA GRAMIN BANK, CHERUCODE BRANCH,MALAPPURAM vs. THE ITO WARD TDS, KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE

ITA 720/COCH/2022[2013-2014(26Q, Q2)]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin12 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Smt.Beena Pillai, Jm

234E of the I.T. Act. The Hon’ble Kerala Court was not adjudicating the issue whether the amendment to section 200A of the I.T.Act with effect from 01.06.2015 has retrospective effect or not. As mentioned earlier, the amendment to section 200A of the I.T.Act whether it applicable from 01.06.2015 has been decided in favour of the assessee

KERALA GRAMIN BANK, CHALIKKARA BRANCH,KOZHIKODE vs. THE ITO WARD TDS, KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE

ITA 752/COCH/2022[2013-2014(26Q,Q2)]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin12 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Smt.Beena Pillai, Jm

234E of the I.T. Act. The Hon’ble Kerala Court was not adjudicating the issue whether the amendment to section 200A of the I.T.Act with effect from 01.06.2015 has retrospective effect or not. As mentioned earlier, the amendment to section 200A of the I.T.Act whether it applicable from 01.06.2015 has been decided in favour of the assessee

KERALA GRAMIN BANK, EDAVANNA BRANCH,MALAPPURAM vs. THE ITO WARD TDS, KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE

ITA 748/COCH/2022[2013-2014(26Q,Q2)]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin12 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Smt.Beena Pillai, Jm

234E of the I.T. Act. The Hon’ble Kerala Court was not adjudicating the issue whether the amendment to section 200A of the I.T.Act with effect from 01.06.2015 has retrospective effect or not. As mentioned earlier, the amendment to section 200A of the I.T.Act whether it applicable from 01.06.2015 has been decided in favour of the assessee