BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

292 results for “section 68”+ Section 2(22)(e)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi4,449Mumbai4,421Bangalore1,566Chennai1,191Kolkata999Ahmedabad928Karnataka672Jaipur644Hyderabad564Indore494Surat422Pune360Chandigarh345Cochin292Visakhapatnam240Raipur225Rajkot189Cuttack155Nagpur145Agra136Lucknow119Telangana88Amritsar88Guwahati83SC81Ranchi70Allahabad67Calcutta58Jodhpur47Patna41Panaji35Dehradun26Jabalpur19Varanasi18Orissa11Rajasthan10Kerala9A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN4Gauhati2A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Andhra Pradesh1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1ANIL R. DAVE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1ARIJIT PASAYAT C.K. THAKKER1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Uttarakhand1

Key Topics

Section 80P88Section 14A57Section 25045Section 80P(2)(a)42Section 80P(2)33Disallowance30Deduction29Limitation/Time-bar23Section 143(3)22Addition to Income

THE KUNDARA PANCHAYATH SERVICE COOPERATIVE BANK LTD,KOLLAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 4, KOLLAM

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 802/COCH/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin29 Apr 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Keshav Dubey

For Appellant: Shri G.Surendranath Rao, A.RFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R
Section 250Section 80PSection 8O

68,214/- as income from other sources and consequently denied deduction u/s 80P of the Act on this amount. The assesse filed an appeal before the CIT(A). The CIT(A)/NFAC, held that the assesse is eligible for deduction u/s 80P of the Act on the business income but the action of the AO in denial of section

THE KUNDARA PANCHAYATH SERVICE COOPERATIVE BANK LTD,KOLLAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4, KOLLAM

Showing 1–20 of 292 · Page 1 of 15

...
20
Section 26316
Section 80P(4)15

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 805/COCH/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin29 Apr 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Keshav Dubey

For Appellant: Shri G.Surendranath Rao, A.RFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R
Section 250Section 80PSection 8O

68,214/- as income from other sources and consequently denied deduction u/s 80P of the Act on this amount. The assesse filed an appeal before the CIT(A). The CIT(A)/NFAC, held that the assesse is eligible for deduction u/s 80P of the Act on the business income but the action of the AO in denial of section

THE KUNDARA PANCHAYATH SERVICE COOPERATIVE BANK LTD,KOLLAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 4, KOLLAM

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 803/COCH/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin29 Apr 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Keshav Dubey

For Appellant: Shri G.Surendranath Rao, A.RFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R
Section 250Section 80PSection 8O

68,214/- as income from other sources and consequently denied deduction u/s 80P of the Act on this amount. The assesse filed an appeal before the CIT(A). The CIT(A)/NFAC, held that the assesse is eligible for deduction u/s 80P of the Act on the business income but the action of the AO in denial of section

SRI.K.M. ASHIK,CALICUT vs. THE DCIT, CALICUT

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 76/COCH/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Jan 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari , Am & George George K., Jm

Section 2Section 2(22)(e)

section 2(22)(e ) of the Income Tax Act . Your appellant relies on the following decisions. CIT v. Creative Dyeing & Printing (P.) Ltd. [2009] 318 ITR 476. The departmental SLP filed against this decision has been dismissed by the supreme court ( 328 ITR (St)10) (SC) CIT v. Ambassador Travels (P.) Ltd. [2009] 318 ITR 376 The matter

SRI.K.M. ASHIK,CALICUT vs. THE DCIT, CALICUT

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 77/COCH/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Jan 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari , Am & George George K., Jm

Section 2Section 2(22)(e)

section 2(22)(e ) of the Income Tax Act . Your appellant relies on the following decisions. CIT v. Creative Dyeing & Printing (P.) Ltd. [2009] 318 ITR 476. The departmental SLP filed against this decision has been dismissed by the supreme court ( 328 ITR (St)10) (SC) CIT v. Ambassador Travels (P.) Ltd. [2009] 318 ITR 376 The matter

SRI.K.M. ASHIK,CALICUT vs. THE DCIT, CALICUT

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 75/COCH/2016[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Jan 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari , Am & George George K., Jm

Section 2Section 2(22)(e)

section 2(22)(e ) of the Income Tax Act . Your appellant relies on the following decisions. CIT v. Creative Dyeing & Printing (P.) Ltd. [2009] 318 ITR 476. The departmental SLP filed against this decision has been dismissed by the supreme court ( 328 ITR (St)10) (SC) CIT v. Ambassador Travels (P.) Ltd. [2009] 318 ITR 376 The matter

THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOLLAM, KOLLAM vs. SRI.P>SUNIL KUMAR, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue as well as the Cross

ITA 352/COCH/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin13 Dec 2018AY 2014-15

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 68

section 2(22)(e) was met. Accordingly, he justified the addition made by the Assessing Officer. 11.4 On the other hand, the Ld. AR submitted that the loan of Rs.1,70,62,169/- was not out of the Reserves and Surpluses of M/s. Sabari Milineium Impex P. Ltd. as on 31/03/2009 since the same as per its balance sheet

THE CENTRAL CIRCLE, KOLLAM, THE CENTRAL CIRCLE,KOLLAM vs. SRI.P.SUNIL KUMAR, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue as well as the Cross

ITA 349/COCH/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin13 Dec 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 68

section 2(22)(e) was met. Accordingly, he justified the addition made by the Assessing Officer. 11.4 On the other hand, the Ld. AR submitted that the loan of Rs.1,70,62,169/- was not out of the Reserves and Surpluses of M/s. Sabari Milineium Impex P. Ltd. as on 31/03/2009 since the same as per its balance sheet

SRI.P.SUNIL KUMAR,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE,KOLLAM, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue as well as the Cross

ITA 355/COCH/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin13 Dec 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 68

section 2(22)(e) was met. Accordingly, he justified the addition made by the Assessing Officer. 11.4 On the other hand, the Ld. AR submitted that the loan of Rs.1,70,62,169/- was not out of the Reserves and Surpluses of M/s. Sabari Milineium Impex P. Ltd. as on 31/03/2009 since the same as per its balance sheet

THE ACIT, KOLLAM vs. SRI.P. SUNIL KUMAR, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue as well as the Cross

ITA 347/COCH/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin13 Dec 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 68

section 2(22)(e) was met. Accordingly, he justified the addition made by the Assessing Officer. 11.4 On the other hand, the Ld. AR submitted that the loan of Rs.1,70,62,169/- was not out of the Reserves and Surpluses of M/s. Sabari Milineium Impex P. Ltd. as on 31/03/2009 since the same as per its balance sheet

THE ACIT, KOLLAM vs. SRI.P.SUNILKUMAR, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue as well as the Cross

ITA 351/COCH/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin13 Dec 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 68

section 2(22)(e) was met. Accordingly, he justified the addition made by the Assessing Officer. 11.4 On the other hand, the Ld. AR submitted that the loan of Rs.1,70,62,169/- was not out of the Reserves and Surpluses of M/s. Sabari Milineium Impex P. Ltd. as on 31/03/2009 since the same as per its balance sheet

THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOLLAM, KOLLAM vs. SRI.P>SUNIL KUMAR, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue as well as the Cross

ITA 354/COCH/2017[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin13 Dec 2018AY 2015-16

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 68

section 2(22)(e) was met. Accordingly, he justified the addition made by the Assessing Officer. 11.4 On the other hand, the Ld. AR submitted that the loan of Rs.1,70,62,169/- was not out of the Reserves and Surpluses of M/s. Sabari Milineium Impex P. Ltd. as on 31/03/2009 since the same as per its balance sheet

THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOLLAM vs. M/S.SABARI ENTERPRISES P. LTD,, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue as well as the Cross

ITA 358/COCH/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin13 Dec 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 68

section 2(22)(e) was met. Accordingly, he justified the addition made by the Assessing Officer. 11.4 On the other hand, the Ld. AR submitted that the loan of Rs.1,70,62,169/- was not out of the Reserves and Surpluses of M/s. Sabari Milineium Impex P. Ltd. as on 31/03/2009 since the same as per its balance sheet

THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOLLAM vs. M/S.SABARI ENTERPRISES P. LTD,, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue as well as the Cross

ITA 360/COCH/2017[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin13 Dec 2018AY 2015-2016

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 68

section 2(22)(e) was met. Accordingly, he justified the addition made by the Assessing Officer. 11.4 On the other hand, the Ld. AR submitted that the loan of Rs.1,70,62,169/- was not out of the Reserves and Surpluses of M/s. Sabari Milineium Impex P. Ltd. as on 31/03/2009 since the same as per its balance sheet

THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOLLAM vs. M/S.SABARI ENTERPRISES P. LTD,, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue as well as the Cross

ITA 359/COCH/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin13 Dec 2018AY 2014-15

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 68

section 2(22)(e) was met. Accordingly, he justified the addition made by the Assessing Officer. 11.4 On the other hand, the Ld. AR submitted that the loan of Rs.1,70,62,169/- was not out of the Reserves and Surpluses of M/s. Sabari Milineium Impex P. Ltd. as on 31/03/2009 since the same as per its balance sheet

THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOLLAM, KOLLAM vs. SRI.P.SUNIL KUMAR, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue as well as the Cross

ITA 350/COCH/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin13 Dec 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 68

section 2(22)(e) was met. Accordingly, he justified the addition made by the Assessing Officer. 11.4 On the other hand, the Ld. AR submitted that the loan of Rs.1,70,62,169/- was not out of the Reserves and Surpluses of M/s. Sabari Milineium Impex P. Ltd. as on 31/03/2009 since the same as per its balance sheet

THE ACIT, KOLLAM vs. SRI.P.SUNILKUMAR, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue as well as the Cross

ITA 348/COCH/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin13 Dec 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 68

section 2(22)(e) was met. Accordingly, he justified the addition made by the Assessing Officer. 11.4 On the other hand, the Ld. AR submitted that the loan of Rs.1,70,62,169/- was not out of the Reserves and Surpluses of M/s. Sabari Milineium Impex P. Ltd. as on 31/03/2009 since the same as per its balance sheet

ASPINWALL & COMPANY LTD,COCHIN vs. THE ACIT, COCHIN

In the result,the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 60/COCH/2015[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin19 May 2020AY 2006-07

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

Section 14A

E R Per CHANDRA POOJARI, AM: The appeals filed by the assessee in ITA Nos. 60& 61/Coch/2015 and 128/Coch/2017 are directed against different orders of the CIT(A) and pertain to the assessment year 2006-07 and 2012-13. The Revenue has also filed appeal in ITA No.133/Coch/2017 for the assessment year. 2. Since the issues involved in these appeals

THE DCIT, COCHIN vs. M/S.ASPINWALL & CO. LTD, COCHIN

In the result,the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 133/COCH/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin19 May 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

Section 14A

E R Per CHANDRA POOJARI, AM: The appeals filed by the assessee in ITA Nos. 60& 61/Coch/2015 and 128/Coch/2017 are directed against different orders of the CIT(A) and pertain to the assessment year 2006-07 and 2012-13. The Revenue has also filed appeal in ITA No.133/Coch/2017 for the assessment year. 2. Since the issues involved in these appeals

ASPINWALL & COMPANY LTD,COCHIN vs. THE ACIT, COCHIN

In the result,the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 61/COCH/2015[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin19 May 2020AY 2006-07

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

Section 14A

E R Per CHANDRA POOJARI, AM: The appeals filed by the assessee in ITA Nos. 60& 61/Coch/2015 and 128/Coch/2017 are directed against different orders of the CIT(A) and pertain to the assessment year 2006-07 and 2012-13. The Revenue has also filed appeal in ITA No.133/Coch/2017 for the assessment year. 2. Since the issues involved in these appeals