BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “section 68”+ Section 199(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi609Mumbai492Karnataka472Bangalore159Ahmedabad156Kolkata132Jaipur120Chennai110Chandigarh67Hyderabad59Calcutta52Raipur47Indore38Rajkot33Lucknow30Pune27Surat27Cuttack22Telangana20Nagpur16Jodhpur13Visakhapatnam9SC9Allahabad7Amritsar5Cochin5Ranchi4Agra4Rajasthan4Jabalpur2Patna2Guwahati2Andhra Pradesh1Orissa1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 80P6Section 143(3)5Section 80A4Section 12A3Section 113Section 2(15)3Section 11(1)3Charitable Trust3Exemption3Addition to Income

INFOPARKS KERALA,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE JT DIRECTOR OF IT (OSD) EXEM), COCHIN

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are partly allowed

ITA 75/COCH/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin11 Aug 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Am & Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm

For Appellant: Sri. Rajakannan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr.AR
Section 11Section 11(1)Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 2(15)

section 2(15). However, the Court does not rule out any future claim made and being independently assessed, if GS1 is able to satisfy that what it provides to its customers is charged on cost-basis with at the most, a nominal mark-up. The foregoing neatly sums up the adjudication qua entities as the assessee, which is accordingly

3
Section 119(2)(b)2
Deduction2

INFOPARKS KERALA,COCHIN vs. THE ACIT, COCHIN

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are partly allowed

ITA 77/COCH/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin11 Aug 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Am & Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm

For Appellant: Sri. Rajakannan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr.AR
Section 11Section 11(1)Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 2(15)

section 2(15). However, the Court does not rule out any future claim made and being independently assessed, if GS1 is able to satisfy that what it provides to its customers is charged on cost-basis with at the most, a nominal mark-up. The foregoing neatly sums up the adjudication qua entities as the assessee, which is accordingly

INFOPARKS KERALA,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE JT DIRECTOR OF IT (OSD) EXEM), COCHIN

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are partly allowed

ITA 76/COCH/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin11 Aug 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Am & Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm

For Appellant: Sri. Rajakannan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr.AR
Section 11Section 11(1)Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 2(15)

section 2(15). However, the Court does not rule out any future claim made and being independently assessed, if GS1 is able to satisfy that what it provides to its customers is charged on cost-basis with at the most, a nominal mark-up. The foregoing neatly sums up the adjudication qua entities as the assessee, which is accordingly

TRIVANDRUM DISTRICT ELECTRICITY BOARD EMPLOYEES CO-OP SOCIETY,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ITO, WD-2(1), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeals stand partly allowed

ITA 411/COCH/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin19 Feb 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Keshav Dubey, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Amaljith, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 119(2)(b)Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 199(2)Section 80ASection 80P

68,05,654/- denying claim for deduction u/s. 80P on the ground that the return of income was filed belatedly placing reliance on the provisions of section 80AC of the Act. 5. Being aggrieved, an appeal was filed before the CIT(A),who vide the impugned order confirmed the action of the AO. 6. Being aggrieved, the appellant

TRIVANDRUM DISTRICT ELECTRICITY BOARD EMPLOYEES CO-OP SOCIETY,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ITO, WD-2(1), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeals stand partly allowed

ITA 410/COCH/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin19 Feb 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Keshav Dubey, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Amaljith, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 119(2)(b)Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 199(2)Section 80ASection 80P

68,05,654/- denying claim for deduction u/s. 80P on the ground that the return of income was filed belatedly placing reliance on the provisions of section 80AC of the Act. 5. Being aggrieved, an appeal was filed before the CIT(A),who vide the impugned order confirmed the action of the AO. 6. Being aggrieved, the appellant