BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

110 results for “section 68”+ Section 153A(1)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi2,199Mumbai1,433Bangalore486Jaipur464Hyderabad454Chennai448Chandigarh187Pune173Ahmedabad164Kolkata116Cochin110Indore105Visakhapatnam94Nagpur79Guwahati78Rajkot75Raipur45Surat45Ranchi42Amritsar42Allahabad39Patna35Agra30Lucknow23Jodhpur22Karnataka19Cuttack18Dehradun14SC6Telangana6Kerala5Jabalpur4Orissa3Calcutta2Rajasthan2Gauhati2Varanasi2Uttarakhand1

Key Topics

Section 250104Section 153A72Section 153C44Addition to Income30Section 143(3)20Section 13218Section 142(1)16Unexplained Investment9Undisclosed Income7

M/S SANTHIMADOM HERBAL CITY TRUST,ERNAKULAM vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE -2, KOCHI

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are partly allowed

ITA 920/COCH/2022[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 Nov 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Am & Shri Manomohan Das, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Mathew Joseph, CAFor Respondent: Smt.J.M.Jamuna Devi, Sr.DR
Section 132Section 144Section 153ASection 153C

1), it may be noted, has not led to the obliteration of the demand raised earlier, but only in scaling it down, as envisaged u/s.234A(4), and which revision could be upward as well. Whether the said set aside was at the instance of the assessee – who was responsible by its conduct for the same, or the Revenue, is immaterial

Showing 1–20 of 110 · Page 1 of 6

Section 1444
Section 69A4
Cash Deposit3

M/S SANTHIMADOM HERBAL CITY TRUST,ERNAKULAM vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 2, KOCHI

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are partly allowed

ITA 921/COCH/2022[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 Nov 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Am & Shri Manomohan Das, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Mathew Joseph, CAFor Respondent: Smt.J.M.Jamuna Devi, Sr.DR
Section 132Section 144Section 153ASection 153C

1), it may be noted, has not led to the obliteration of the demand raised earlier, but only in scaling it down, as envisaged u/s.234A(4), and which revision could be upward as well. Whether the said set aside was at the instance of the assessee – who was responsible by its conduct for the same, or the Revenue, is immaterial

DCIT, ERNAKULAM vs. MATHA ENTERPRISES, ANGAMALLY

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 269/COCH/2010[2001-02]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin16 Dec 2019AY 2001-02

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am &Shri George George K, Jm

For Respondent: Sri. Sudhanshu Shekhar Jha, CIT(DR)

b) Sri K. A. Paul, the Accountant, stated that the statements indicate the sales of different counters as explained in the reply and that there has been suppression of sales by the assessee firm, (c) The correctness of the above mentioned statement of the accountant was authenticated by the Managing Partner on the date of search. (d) The figure

M/S BEST BAKERY & ICE CREAM PARLOUR,ANGAMALLY vs. ACIT, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 507/COCH/2010[2001-02]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin16 Dec 2019AY 2001-02

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am &Shri George George K, Jm

For Respondent: Sri. Sudhanshu Shekhar Jha, CIT(DR)

b) Sri K. A. Paul, the Accountant, stated that the statements indicate the sales of different counters as explained in the reply and that there has been suppression of sales by the assessee firm, (c) The correctness of the above mentioned statement of the accountant was authenticated by the Managing Partner on the date of search. (d) The figure

M/S BEST BAKERY & ICE CREAM PARLOUR,ANGAMALLY vs. ACIT, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 513/COCH/2010[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin16 Dec 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am &Shri George George K, Jm

For Respondent: Sri. Sudhanshu Shekhar Jha, CIT(DR)

b) Sri K. A. Paul, the Accountant, stated that the statements indicate the sales of different counters as explained in the reply and that there has been suppression of sales by the assessee firm, (c) The correctness of the above mentioned statement of the accountant was authenticated by the Managing Partner on the date of search. (d) The figure

M/S. MATHA ENTERPRISES,,ANGAMALLY vs. ACIT, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 304/COCH/2010[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin16 Dec 2019AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am &Shri George George K, Jm

For Respondent: Sri. Sudhanshu Shekhar Jha, CIT(DR)

b) Sri K. A. Paul, the Accountant, stated that the statements indicate the sales of different counters as explained in the reply and that there has been suppression of sales by the assessee firm, (c) The correctness of the above mentioned statement of the accountant was authenticated by the Managing Partner on the date of search. (d) The figure

M/S BEST BAKERY & ICE CREAM PARLOUR,ANGAMALLY vs. ACIT, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 509/COCH/2010[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin16 Dec 2019AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am &Shri George George K, Jm

For Respondent: Sri. Sudhanshu Shekhar Jha, CIT(DR)

b) Sri K. A. Paul, the Accountant, stated that the statements indicate the sales of different counters as explained in the reply and that there has been suppression of sales by the assessee firm, (c) The correctness of the above mentioned statement of the accountant was authenticated by the Managing Partner on the date of search. (d) The figure

M/S. MATHA ENTERPRISES,,ANGAMALLY vs. ACIT, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 303/COCH/2010[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin16 Dec 2019AY 2002-03

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am &Shri George George K, Jm

For Respondent: Sri. Sudhanshu Shekhar Jha, CIT(DR)

b) Sri K. A. Paul, the Accountant, stated that the statements indicate the sales of different counters as explained in the reply and that there has been suppression of sales by the assessee firm, (c) The correctness of the above mentioned statement of the accountant was authenticated by the Managing Partner on the date of search. (d) The figure

M/S. MATHA ENTERPRISES,,ANGAMALLY vs. ACIT, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 308/COCH/2010[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin16 Dec 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am &Shri George George K, Jm

For Respondent: Sri. Sudhanshu Shekhar Jha, CIT(DR)

b) Sri K. A. Paul, the Accountant, stated that the statements indicate the sales of different counters as explained in the reply and that there has been suppression of sales by the assessee firm, (c) The correctness of the above mentioned statement of the accountant was authenticated by the Managing Partner on the date of search. (d) The figure

SRI SRAVAN KUMAR NEELA,NALGONDA vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, the instant appeals by the assesses are dismissed

ITA 899/COCH/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin15 Apr 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Dasuma Maheshwara Rao Chinni Asst. Cit, Central Circle -1, Hno. 7-298, 7 Ward Aayakar Bhavan (North Block) Gandhi Bomma Centre Vs. Kozhikode 673001 Dachepalle, Guntur 522414 [Pan:Arjpc0342D] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 115BSection 132ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 153ASection 69A

153A of the Act, assessed the income returned for the current year u/s. 69A of the Act at Rs. 77.10 lacs, i.e., the cash seized, as unexplained, levying tax u/s. 115BBE of the Act. The assessee disputes the same inasmuch as income brought to tax u/s. 69A is liable to be taxed u/s. 115BBE at a higher rate

SRI UMA MAHESHWARA RAO CHINNI,GUNTUR vs. ASST COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, the instant appeals by the assesses are dismissed

ITA 895/COCH/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin15 Apr 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Dasuma Maheshwara Rao Chinni Asst. Cit, Central Circle -1, Hno. 7-298, 7 Ward Aayakar Bhavan (North Block) Gandhi Bomma Centre Vs. Kozhikode 673001 Dachepalle, Guntur 522414 [Pan:Arjpc0342D] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 115BSection 132ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 153ASection 69A

153A of the Act, assessed the income returned for the current year u/s. 69A of the Act at Rs. 77.10 lacs, i.e., the cash seized, as unexplained, levying tax u/s. 115BBE of the Act. The assessee disputes the same inasmuch as income brought to tax u/s. 69A is liable to be taxed u/s. 115BBE at a higher rate

DCIT, TRICHUR vs. M/S/E.T.DEVASSY &SONS, TRICHUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 533/COCH/2013[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin26 Jun 2019AY 2003-04

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153A

section 153A vide order dated 29.12.2009 in respect of the Asst. Years 2002-03 to 2007-08 and u/s. 143(3) in respect of Asst. Year 2008-09 in respect of the following 84 cases in inspect of 13 Assesees. 1. M/s New Kerala Investments ( Asst Years 2002-03 to 2008-09) 2. M/s E T Devassy & Sons, Edassery

DCIT, TRICHUR vs. M/S/E.T.DEVASSY &SONS,

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 535/COCH/2013[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin26 Jun 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153A

section 153A vide order dated 29.12.2009 in respect of the Asst. Years 2002-03 to 2007-08 and u/s. 143(3) in respect of Asst. Year 2008-09 in respect of the following 84 cases in inspect of 13 Assesees. 1. M/s New Kerala Investments ( Asst Years 2002-03 to 2008-09) 2. M/s E T Devassy & Sons, Edassery

DCIT, TRICHUR vs. ST.FRANCIS CLAY WORKS, TRICHUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 526/COCH/2013[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin26 Jun 2019AY 2003-04

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153A

section 153A vide order dated 29.12.2009 in respect of the Asst. Years 2002-03 to 2007-08 and u/s. 143(3) in respect of Asst. Year 2008-09 in respect of the following 84 cases in inspect of 13 Assesees. 1. M/s New Kerala Investments ( Asst Years 2002-03 to 2008-09) 2. M/s E T Devassy & Sons, Edassery

DCIT, TRICHUR vs. ST.FRANCIS CLAY WORKS, TRICHUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 528/COCH/2013[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin26 Jun 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153A

section 153A vide order dated 29.12.2009 in respect of the Asst. Years 2002-03 to 2007-08 and u/s. 143(3) in respect of Asst. Year 2008-09 in respect of the following 84 cases in inspect of 13 Assesees. 1. M/s New Kerala Investments ( Asst Years 2002-03 to 2008-09) 2. M/s E T Devassy & Sons, Edassery

DCIT, TRICHUR vs. M/S/E.T.DEVASSY &SONS, TRICHUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 532/COCH/2013[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin26 Jun 2019AY 2002-03

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153A

section 153A vide order dated 29.12.2009 in respect of the Asst. Years 2002-03 to 2007-08 and u/s. 143(3) in respect of Asst. Year 2008-09 in respect of the following 84 cases in inspect of 13 Assesees. 1. M/s New Kerala Investments ( Asst Years 2002-03 to 2008-09) 2. M/s E T Devassy & Sons, Edassery

DCIT, TRICHUR vs. M/S NEW KERALA INVESTMENTS, TRICHUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 539/COCH/2013[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin26 Jun 2019AY 2002-03

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153A

section 153A vide order dated 29.12.2009 in respect of the Asst. Years 2002-03 to 2007-08 and u/s. 143(3) in respect of Asst. Year 2008-09 in respect of the following 84 cases in inspect of 13 Assesees. 1. M/s New Kerala Investments ( Asst Years 2002-03 to 2008-09) 2. M/s E T Devassy & Sons, Edassery

DCIT, TRICHUR vs. M/S.EDASSERY CERAMICS, TRICHUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 596/COCH/2013[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin26 Jun 2019AY 2004-05

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153A

section 153A vide order dated 29.12.2009 in respect of the Asst. Years 2002-03 to 2007-08 and u/s. 143(3) in respect of Asst. Year 2008-09 in respect of the following 84 cases in inspect of 13 Assesees. 1. M/s New Kerala Investments ( Asst Years 2002-03 to 2008-09) 2. M/s E T Devassy & Sons, Edassery

DCIT, TRICHUR vs. M/S ST.FRANCIS CLAY DECOR TILES, THRISSUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 587/COCH/2013[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin26 Jun 2019AY 2004-05

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153A

section 153A vide order dated 29.12.2009 in respect of the Asst. Years 2002-03 to 2007-08 and u/s. 143(3) in respect of Asst. Year 2008-09 in respect of the following 84 cases in inspect of 13 Assesees. 1. M/s New Kerala Investments ( Asst Years 2002-03 to 2008-09) 2. M/s E T Devassy & Sons, Edassery

DCIT, TRICHUR vs. M/S.EDASSERY CERAMICS, TRICHUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 597/COCH/2013[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin26 Jun 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153A

section 153A vide order dated 29.12.2009 in respect of the Asst. Years 2002-03 to 2007-08 and u/s. 143(3) in respect of Asst. Year 2008-09 in respect of the following 84 cases in inspect of 13 Assesees. 1. M/s New Kerala Investments ( Asst Years 2002-03 to 2008-09) 2. M/s E T Devassy & Sons, Edassery