BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “section 68”+ Section 144Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi91Mumbai70Chennai62Kolkata24Allahabad21Pune19Bangalore17Indore16Jaipur16Lucknow14Patna11Chandigarh10Nagpur10Surat9Hyderabad9Raipur9Visakhapatnam8Ahmedabad7Agra5Cuttack4Amritsar3Cochin2Karnataka2Rajkot1Orissa1SC1

Key Topics

Section 37(1)8Section 374Section 452Section 144A2Deduction2Disallowance2

ARUN THOMAS,CHENGANNUR, ALAPPUZHA, KERALA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE,THIRUVALLA

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 768/COCH/2023[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin21 Oct 2024AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K.

For Appellant: Shri Suresh Kumar, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 144ASection 37Section 37(1)Section 45

68,28,669/- after making reference to the judgement of the Hon'ble Kerala High Court dated 30.10.2017 in the own case of the assessee. On appeal the learned CIT(A) confirmed the same. 4. Being aggrieved by the order of the learned CIT(A), the assessee is in appeal before us. 5. The learned A.R. fairly admitted that

ARUN THOMAS,CHENGANNUR, ALAPPUZHA, KERALA vs. INCOME TAX AUTHORITY, NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI, NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 769/COCH/2023[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin21 Oct 2024AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K.

For Appellant: Shri Suresh Kumar, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 144ASection 37Section 37(1)Section 45

68,28,669/- after making reference to the judgement of the Hon'ble Kerala High Court dated 30.10.2017 in the own case of the assessee. On appeal the learned CIT(A) confirmed the same. 4. Being aggrieved by the order of the learned CIT(A), the assessee is in appeal before us. 5. The learned A.R. fairly admitted that