BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

97 results for “section 68”+ Section 130clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,016Mumbai864Karnataka475Bangalore232Chennai225Jaipur198Ahmedabad186Kolkata151Hyderabad114Chandigarh110Cochin97Agra75Indore75Raipur61Surat58Calcutta56Pune52Lucknow48Telangana42Visakhapatnam35Rajkot33Allahabad29Nagpur27Ranchi27Cuttack25SC19Guwahati19Jodhpur14Amritsar14Patna13Dehradun10Rajasthan7Jabalpur6Varanasi5Orissa4Panaji2Andhra Pradesh1Uttarakhand1

Key Topics

Section 14A143Section 250114Section 153A52Section 143(3)28Disallowance22Section 14719Section 142(1)16Section 15413Deduction13Section 36

M/S SANTHIMADOM HERBAL CITY TRUST,ERNAKULAM vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 2, KOCHI

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are partly allowed

ITA 921/COCH/2022[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 Nov 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Am & Shri Manomohan Das, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Mathew Joseph, CAFor Respondent: Smt.J.M.Jamuna Devi, Sr.DR
Section 132Section 144Section 153ASection 153C

130 ITR 244 (SC). The accounts, it may be appreciated, only form part of the assessee’s explanation. It is this that led us to state of the addition for both the years being on account of unexplained investment; its routing through accounts, where so, notwithstanding, which cannot be allowed to be a ruse (see para 4.6). As explained

Showing 1–20 of 97 · Page 1 of 5

12
Limitation/Time-bar6
Addition to Income5

M/S SANTHIMADOM HERBAL CITY TRUST,ERNAKULAM vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE -2, KOCHI

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are partly allowed

ITA 920/COCH/2022[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 Nov 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Am & Shri Manomohan Das, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Mathew Joseph, CAFor Respondent: Smt.J.M.Jamuna Devi, Sr.DR
Section 132Section 144Section 153ASection 153C

130 ITR 244 (SC). The accounts, it may be appreciated, only form part of the assessee’s explanation. It is this that led us to state of the addition for both the years being on account of unexplained investment; its routing through accounts, where so, notwithstanding, which cannot be allowed to be a ruse (see para 4.6). As explained

THE ITO,, COCHIN vs. M.SKERALA AYURVEDA LTD, ALUVA

In the result, ground No.2 raised by the Revenue is allowed

ITA 307/COCH/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin18 Sept 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Smt.A.S.BindhuFor Respondent: Sri.Mathew Joseph
Section 14A

130 by invoking Rule 8D(2)(ii), we noticed that the total investment as on 31.03.2007 is Rs.11,33,68,682. (Refer Schedule F concerning investment forming part of the Balance ITA Nos.307-308/Coch/2017. 3 M/s.Kerala Ayurveda Limited. Sheet). Out of the total investment of Rs.11,33,68,682, a sum of Rs.4,87,58,962 was investment made

THE ITO,, COCHIN vs. M.SKERALA AYURVEDA LTD, ALUVA

In the result, ground No.2 raised by the Revenue is allowed

ITA 308/COCH/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin18 Sept 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Smt.A.S.BindhuFor Respondent: Sri.Mathew Joseph
Section 14A

130 by invoking Rule 8D(2)(ii), we noticed that the total investment as on 31.03.2007 is Rs.11,33,68,682. (Refer Schedule F concerning investment forming part of the Balance ITA Nos.307-308/Coch/2017. 3 M/s.Kerala Ayurveda Limited. Sheet). Out of the total investment of Rs.11,33,68,682, a sum of Rs.4,87,58,962 was investment made

DCIT, TRICHUR vs. M/S/E.T.DEVASSY &SONS, TRICHUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 532/COCH/2013[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin26 Jun 2019AY 2002-03

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153A

130 38,13,954 37,48,824 14,01,628 23,366 13,78,262 5 I.T.A. Nos.539-543 /Coch/2013, 532-535/Coch/2013 525 to 529/Coch/2013 594-597/Coch/2013 & 587-589/Coch/2013 2004-05 1,03,010 47,53,658 46,50,648 17,05,275 36,955 16,68

DCIT, TRICHUR vs. M/S NEW KERALA INVESTMENTS, TRICHUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 539/COCH/2013[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin26 Jun 2019AY 2002-03

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153A

130 38,13,954 37,48,824 14,01,628 23,366 13,78,262 5 I.T.A. Nos.539-543 /Coch/2013, 532-535/Coch/2013 525 to 529/Coch/2013 594-597/Coch/2013 & 587-589/Coch/2013 2004-05 1,03,010 47,53,658 46,50,648 17,05,275 36,955 16,68

DCIT, TRICHUR vs. M/S ST.FRANCIS CLAY DECOR TILES, THRISSUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 588/COCH/2013[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin26 Jun 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153A

130 38,13,954 37,48,824 14,01,628 23,366 13,78,262 5 I.T.A. Nos.539-543 /Coch/2013, 532-535/Coch/2013 525 to 529/Coch/2013 594-597/Coch/2013 & 587-589/Coch/2013 2004-05 1,03,010 47,53,658 46,50,648 17,05,275 36,955 16,68

DCIT, TRICHUR vs. M/S.EDASSERY CERAMICS, TRICHUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 596/COCH/2013[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin26 Jun 2019AY 2004-05

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153A

130 38,13,954 37,48,824 14,01,628 23,366 13,78,262 5 I.T.A. Nos.539-543 /Coch/2013, 532-535/Coch/2013 525 to 529/Coch/2013 594-597/Coch/2013 & 587-589/Coch/2013 2004-05 1,03,010 47,53,658 46,50,648 17,05,275 36,955 16,68

DCIT, TRICHUR vs. ST.FRANCIS CLAY WORKS, TRICHUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 526/COCH/2013[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin26 Jun 2019AY 2003-04

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153A

130 38,13,954 37,48,824 14,01,628 23,366 13,78,262 5 I.T.A. Nos.539-543 /Coch/2013, 532-535/Coch/2013 525 to 529/Coch/2013 594-597/Coch/2013 & 587-589/Coch/2013 2004-05 1,03,010 47,53,658 46,50,648 17,05,275 36,955 16,68

DCIT, TRICHUR vs. M/S.EDASSERY CERAMICS, TRICHUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 597/COCH/2013[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin26 Jun 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153A

130 38,13,954 37,48,824 14,01,628 23,366 13,78,262 5 I.T.A. Nos.539-543 /Coch/2013, 532-535/Coch/2013 525 to 529/Coch/2013 594-597/Coch/2013 & 587-589/Coch/2013 2004-05 1,03,010 47,53,658 46,50,648 17,05,275 36,955 16,68

DCIT, TRICHUR vs. M/S ST.FRANCIS CLAY DECOR TILES, THRISSUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 589/COCH/2013[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin26 Jun 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153A

130 38,13,954 37,48,824 14,01,628 23,366 13,78,262 5 I.T.A. Nos.539-543 /Coch/2013, 532-535/Coch/2013 525 to 529/Coch/2013 594-597/Coch/2013 & 587-589/Coch/2013 2004-05 1,03,010 47,53,658 46,50,648 17,05,275 36,955 16,68

DCIT, TRICHUR vs. ST.FRANCIS CLAY WORKS, TRICHUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 529/COCH/2013[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin26 Jun 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153A

130 38,13,954 37,48,824 14,01,628 23,366 13,78,262 5 I.T.A. Nos.539-543 /Coch/2013, 532-535/Coch/2013 525 to 529/Coch/2013 594-597/Coch/2013 & 587-589/Coch/2013 2004-05 1,03,010 47,53,658 46,50,648 17,05,275 36,955 16,68

DCIT, TRICHUR vs. M/S/E.T.DEVASSY &SONS, TRICHUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 533/COCH/2013[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin26 Jun 2019AY 2003-04

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153A

130 38,13,954 37,48,824 14,01,628 23,366 13,78,262 5 I.T.A. Nos.539-543 /Coch/2013, 532-535/Coch/2013 525 to 529/Coch/2013 594-597/Coch/2013 & 587-589/Coch/2013 2004-05 1,03,010 47,53,658 46,50,648 17,05,275 36,955 16,68

DCIT, TRICHUR vs. M/S/E.T.DEVASSY &SONS,

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 535/COCH/2013[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin26 Jun 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153A

130 38,13,954 37,48,824 14,01,628 23,366 13,78,262 5 I.T.A. Nos.539-543 /Coch/2013, 532-535/Coch/2013 525 to 529/Coch/2013 594-597/Coch/2013 & 587-589/Coch/2013 2004-05 1,03,010 47,53,658 46,50,648 17,05,275 36,955 16,68

DCIT, TRICHUR vs. M/S ST.FRANCIS CLAY DECOR TILES, THRISSUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 587/COCH/2013[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin26 Jun 2019AY 2004-05

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153A

130 38,13,954 37,48,824 14,01,628 23,366 13,78,262 5 I.T.A. Nos.539-543 /Coch/2013, 532-535/Coch/2013 525 to 529/Coch/2013 594-597/Coch/2013 & 587-589/Coch/2013 2004-05 1,03,010 47,53,658 46,50,648 17,05,275 36,955 16,68

DCIT, TRICHUR vs. ST.FRANCIS CLAY WORKS, TRICHUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 525/COCH/2013[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin26 Jun 2019AY 2002-03

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153A

130 38,13,954 37,48,824 14,01,628 23,366 13,78,262 5 I.T.A. Nos.539-543 /Coch/2013, 532-535/Coch/2013 525 to 529/Coch/2013 594-597/Coch/2013 & 587-589/Coch/2013 2004-05 1,03,010 47,53,658 46,50,648 17,05,275 36,955 16,68

DCIT, TRICHUR vs. M/S/E.T.DEVASSY &SONS, TRICHUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 534/COCH/2013[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin26 Jun 2019AY 2004-05

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153A

130 38,13,954 37,48,824 14,01,628 23,366 13,78,262 5 I.T.A. Nos.539-543 /Coch/2013, 532-535/Coch/2013 525 to 529/Coch/2013 594-597/Coch/2013 & 587-589/Coch/2013 2004-05 1,03,010 47,53,658 46,50,648 17,05,275 36,955 16,68

DCIT, TRICHUR vs. ST.FRANCIS CLAY WORKS, TRICHUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 527/COCH/2013[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin26 Jun 2019AY 2004-05

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153A

130 38,13,954 37,48,824 14,01,628 23,366 13,78,262 5 I.T.A. Nos.539-543 /Coch/2013, 532-535/Coch/2013 525 to 529/Coch/2013 594-597/Coch/2013 & 587-589/Coch/2013 2004-05 1,03,010 47,53,658 46,50,648 17,05,275 36,955 16,68

DCIT, TRICHUR vs. ST.FRANCIS CLAY WORKS, TRICHUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 528/COCH/2013[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin26 Jun 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153A

130 38,13,954 37,48,824 14,01,628 23,366 13,78,262 5 I.T.A. Nos.539-543 /Coch/2013, 532-535/Coch/2013 525 to 529/Coch/2013 594-597/Coch/2013 & 587-589/Coch/2013 2004-05 1,03,010 47,53,658 46,50,648 17,05,275 36,955 16,68

DCIT, TRICHUR vs. M/S.EDASSERY CERAMICS, TRICHUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 595/COCH/2013[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin26 Jun 2019AY 2003-04

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153A

130 38,13,954 37,48,824 14,01,628 23,366 13,78,262 5 I.T.A. Nos.539-543 /Coch/2013, 532-535/Coch/2013 525 to 529/Coch/2013 594-597/Coch/2013 & 587-589/Coch/2013 2004-05 1,03,010 47,53,658 46,50,648 17,05,275 36,955 16,68