BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “section 68”+ Section 10Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi399Mumbai328Bangalore285Kolkata118Ahmedabad96Hyderabad81Pune61Chennai43Jaipur39Chandigarh31Lucknow22Indore19Rajkot11Cuttack11Surat11Nagpur6Varanasi6Agra4Cochin4Karnataka3Panaji3Patna3Visakhapatnam3Allahabad2Guwahati2Raipur2Calcutta2Amritsar2Jabalpur2Telangana1Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 2(22)(e)9Section 10B5Addition to Income4Section 23Deemed Dividend3Section 402Section 195(6)2

THE ITO,, ALAPPUZHA vs. M/S.EXTRAWEAVE P. LTD, ALAPPUZHA

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is partly allowed

ITA 448/COCH/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin24 Jun 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri George George K. & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahum/S. Extraweave Pvt. Ltd. Arattukulangara Complex 264B/Cmc 1 Vs. A.N. Puram, Alapuzha 688011 Sakteeswara Junction Cherthala 688524 Pan – Aabce5438L Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Shri R. Krishan, CAFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 10BSection 10B(3)Section 143(2)Section 195Section 195(6)Section 40

68,30,684 9 M/s. Extraweave Pvt. Ltd. In this regard the assessee submitted that the profit from the exempted unit is to be calculated on standalone basis and details were submitted. The AO after considering the submissions of the assessee not agreed to not to set off losses from profit of the eligible unit under Section 10B

SRI.K.M. ASHIK,CALICUT vs. THE DCIT, CALICUT

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 75/COCH/2016[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Jan 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari , Am & George George K., Jm

Section 2Section 2(22)(e)

10B, Skyline Palace Heights, Income-tax, Central Circle-2, Jawahar Nagar, Kozhikode Kozhikode. [PAN: ACHPA 5112DE] (Assessee-Appellant) (Revenue-Respondent) Assessee by Shri G. Surendranath Rao, CA Revenue by Shri A. Dhanaraj, Sr. DR Date of hearing 30/01/2018 Date of pronouncement 30/01/2018 O R D E R Per CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: These appeals by the assessee are directed against

SRI.K.M. ASHIK,CALICUT vs. THE DCIT, CALICUT

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 76/COCH/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Jan 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari , Am & George George K., Jm

Section 2Section 2(22)(e)

10B, Skyline Palace Heights, Income-tax, Central Circle-2, Jawahar Nagar, Kozhikode Kozhikode. [PAN: ACHPA 5112DE] (Assessee-Appellant) (Revenue-Respondent) Assessee by Shri G. Surendranath Rao, CA Revenue by Shri A. Dhanaraj, Sr. DR Date of hearing 30/01/2018 Date of pronouncement 30/01/2018 O R D E R Per CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: These appeals by the assessee are directed against

SRI.K.M. ASHIK,CALICUT vs. THE DCIT, CALICUT

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 77/COCH/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Jan 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari , Am & George George K., Jm

Section 2Section 2(22)(e)

10B, Skyline Palace Heights, Income-tax, Central Circle-2, Jawahar Nagar, Kozhikode Kozhikode. [PAN: ACHPA 5112DE] (Assessee-Appellant) (Revenue-Respondent) Assessee by Shri G. Surendranath Rao, CA Revenue by Shri A. Dhanaraj, Sr. DR Date of hearing 30/01/2018 Date of pronouncement 30/01/2018 O R D E R Per CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: These appeals by the assessee are directed against